Tagged: technology Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 6:00 am on May 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , technology   

    Competitive Collaboration in the Fintech Age 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAcjAAAAJDFmYjZhYWRkLWY3ZGQtNGIzZC1iMzhhLTA2ZTQ0MzAxNTNkOA

    “How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked.

    “Two ways,” Mike said. “Gradually and then suddenly.”

    The Sun Also Rises, Ernest Hemingway, 1926.

    Inflection Point

    After three-and-a-half years of helping build and scale AMP Credit Technologies – first as head of product management; then as head of strategy & corporate development – today marks my penultimate day with the company. Next month I’ll take on a new challenge: as Asia-Pacific Leader for Ernst & Young (EY).

    From the outset, our thesis at AMP was that enabling incumbent (or at least those with the capability and willingness to work with startups) was preferable to competing with them – that combining our respective strengths would allow for greater scale and performance than competition and disintermediation. To be sure, we first had to build and demonstrate the efficacy of our alternative lending platform by putting our own money in the market (four separate markets, to be precise) as the ultimate “proof of concept”. Once that was done, and the results made clear, we knew that we’d be in a position to enable the more forward-looking banks to profitably provide unsecured credit to traditionally under-served small businesses. A similar thesis had informed our approach at Realex Payments – the European ecommerce payment gateway (since acquired by Global Payments, Inc.) which combined direct-to-market customer acquisition with white-labelled full-service delivery for partner institutions.

    Competitive Collaboration

    At its simplest, the thesis is that existing financial service providers have key competitive advantages relative to most challengers – not least those pertaining to cost of capital, data, distribution, and often (though not always) regulatory certainty. Conversely, the better fintechs are typically those that capitalise on their advantages relative to speed (both of decision-making and of action), organisational agility, and a demand-led focus on transparency and customer experience.

    With experience on both sides of the table, it is my sincere belief that the greatest opportunity lies not in all-out competition but in a form of “competitive cooperation” between incumbents and fintechs. Indeed, despite the often confrontational rhetoric, many fintechs are already heavily dependent on the existing banking and payments infrastructure. In addition, I’m confident that we’ll see increased collaboration between fintechs (both early- and growth-stage) as they seek horizontal and vertical reach via international partnerships and product bundling, respectively. Finally, I expect ever-more collaboration between incumbents as they seek to acquire or maintain product and geographic coverage without having to build it themselves (with all the capital and regulatory considerations that would entail) – or simply as a means to pool technical knowledge.

    Building solutions for banks and non-bank financial institutions has taught me that most incumbents are not prepared – technically, organisationally, culturally – for working with startups. Conversely, as an active member of the startups community (both as mentor and investor), I’m also fully aware how unprepared many startups are for working with incumbents. Both sides require support in addressing the challenges and opportunities of service un-bundling and re-bundling, of customer dis-aggregation and re-aggregation.

    The Fintech Age

    The application of to financial services has historically been the preserve of established incumbents or their largest technology vendors. More recently, the ever-increasing availability of and access to inexpensive distributed computing power (and data analytics) has allowed new entrants to develop services and scale at unprecedented speed – thereby heralding a new ‘Fintech Age’. When considered in light of the regulatory changes of recent years and evolving customer expectations, it’s not hard to see why traditional financial services are being decoupled and in some cases displaced.

    While there are certainly common characteristics to the rise of fintech as a global phenomenon, there are also environmental factors unique to Asia-Pacific. The global financial crisis – which simultaneously contributed to greater regulation and the retrenchment of global players – had rather different impacts in Asia than in the US or Europe. Correspondingly, the response of both governments and markets has been different. Added to this, we have the sheer size of the markets in Asia (whether of the traditionally unbanked or growing middle classes), their diversity, the absence of common platforms, the ascendancy of the mobile internet, and the associated opportunities (or necessity) for technological “leapfrogging”; these are the features that make Asia-Pacific the most exciting region in the world when it comes to new-form financial services. Mainland China, for example, is undoubtedly the world-leader when it comes to advances in alternative credit scoring, frictionless payments, and social commerce. Clearly there is much that each region can learn from the others.

    Pastures New

    And so it is that I move into a new role – one focused on driving collaboration and competition across verticals (banking, insurance, telecommunications, etc.) and throughout the region. As Asia-Pacific Fintech Leader it will be my responsibility to help EY clients (both current and future) navigate these new-form challenges and opportunities, while creating an environment of cooperation and collaboration across the spectrum. I’m determined to move past the current trend of marketing-led “collaboration 1.0” initiatives to more nuanced partnership offerings and real open innovation – with the incentives of all parties aligned from the outset. I expect to focus less on brand-building and more on advising clients on strategic partnerships and targeted acquisitions. The overriding objective will be to separate reality from hype, signal from noise.

    I look forward to working with like-minded individuals – in industry and venture capital, in government and regulators, in startups and growth-stage innovators – to foster an environment of mutual advancement. I even hope to work with other service providers in this new era of “competitive cooperation”, wherein a rising tide will surely lift all boats.

    Just as we’ve seen a new generation of fintech entrepreneurs (typically with a background in financial services) so too will we see a new generation of trusted advisors – those with the requisite knowledge, experience, passion, and excitement to address the challenges and opportunities of the Fintech Age.

    Financial services is about to change in two ways: gradually and then suddenly.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesphiliplloyd” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”James Lloyd”]  is Asia-Pacific FinTech Leader @ EY and this article was originally posted on linkedin

     
  • user 12:18 am on May 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , technology,   

    Faster Chip Payments Standard Is in the Works, MasterCard Says 

    The payment networks are coming together to work on a for speedier EMV transactions. As part of that effort, is making its M/ Fast “available to all parties” involved, including other payment networks, acquirers, and processors, Chiro Aikat, senior vice president of product delivery, told Bank Innovation.Read More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 7:37 pm on May 26, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , technology   

    Nasdaq Opens Blockchain Services to Global Exchange Partners 

    ‘s new financial infrastructure hub could pave the way for other exchanges to start using in a wide range of .
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 6:00 am on May 26, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , technology   

    Marketplace Lending Platform – Build vs Buy 

    Peer-to-Peer or Marketplace lending platforms have transformed the lending space, making it more convenient and accessible for both lenders and borrowers, by using as a backbone. The industry is witnessing extraordinary growth with PwC’s analysis indicating the P2P lending market could reach $150 billion or higher by 2025. The reason these marketplace lenders have been able to disrupt the status quo is because they have identified the consumer pain point and using technology, offered agility, flexibility and better experience which the banking behemoths were not able to.

    Given the growth rate and the still untapped potential in many global markets, no wonder many players now want to enter the space with their own P2P lending platforms. Most of these players are either existing lenders, financial institutions, investment management companies or people with experience in Bank and Financial Services Industry , who are probably bored of their jobs and now want to explore the realm of alternate lending. Most of them understand the lending business, some of them have access to borrowers or lenders – but few of them have expertise or access to technology. 

    So here comes a Shakespearean dilemma –

    to build or to buy the technology platform?

     

    Why is this question important and what is at stake? We explain in detail below and lay out the options

     

      • Time to Market – Perhaps the most important determinant of your success is your time to market. Will you be one of the first few players in your geography or merely an also-ran? Launching quickly is a huge advantage so your technology has to be ready quickly. Building it in-house would take around of 10 – 18 months whereas a good, while an established software vendor can have you up and running in 1 month.
      • Cost Efficiency – When evaluating the cost of building vs. buying a software, keep in mind that the cost of building is not limited to the cost of development. It also includes cost of maintenance and upgrades. Buying a software solution means that the vendor takes care of maintenance and upgrades. Overall, the cost of building is typically around four  times higher than the cost of buying.
      • Expertise – You are most likely financial expert and not a technology expert. The project management of building a software from scratch is not an easy journey and can be full of unexpected delays. A software vendor on the other hand will provide you with a mature product that has been tested and used by others. Moreover, at the start of building the software you may not be able to fully anticipate the features required whereas buying a product will come with features that have been well thought through due to feedback loop from existing customers.
      • Scalability & Flexibility – Since marketplace lending is a young industry, you need technology that is scalable and flexible to grow with you. You may want to introduce a new loan product or enter a new geographic market. If you need to innovate or change something in your process, the technology should be agile enough to support this and not be a step behind. A platform built by an experienced software vendor would be much more likely to provide that than an in-house system. This is because vendors invest significant time and resources to ensure their solutions are flexible to cater to a wide customer base. A platform solution offered by a vendor would also be already supporting different loan products, making it easy for you to enhance your own loan offering.
      •  

    P2Pforce

    P2PForce is a mature software, and has quickly gained traction in the market due to the flexibility ans scalability it offers to companies looking to enter the marketplace lending space.

    Unlike other such software providers, P2Pforce is built from scratch and hence more customizable. It is modular and based on APIs which means it can easily be integrated with other systems, either in parts or in whole. It is now used by clients in UK, Singapore, Europe, Philippines, Malaysia and India.

    It offers superior functionality in a cost efficient manner so that you can succeed in your quest to launch your own P2P lending platform. The software is cloud-based and can be accessed from anywhere on your browser. We also ensure that your data is secure and that you have all the technical support you need so that you never have to worry about technology, leaving you to focus on growing your business.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/marketplace-lending-platform-build-vs-buy-vishal-sahu” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Vishal Sahu”], is Co Founder & CEO at Labs and this article was originally published on linkedin

     
  • user 11:18 pm on May 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , technology,   

    Goldman Sachs: Blockchain Tech Could Save Capital Markets $6 Billion a Year 

    A new report from Investment Research projects billions across industries.
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 10:40 pm on May 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , technology   

    Bank to basics | The Economist 

    TWO years ago Swedbank, Sweden’s biggest retail bank, moved from its offices in the centre of Stockholm to a drab business park outside the city. Employees fretted about leaving their prime location, a few doors from the Riksbank, the central bank, and a stone’s throw from Parliament. The move, which has saved $25m-odd a year, was symbolic not only of the bank’s thrift, but also of its desire to retreat from the exciting but risky end of banking. Instead, much like the Scandinavian furniture in its office, it is returning to something simpler and more straightforward. That strategy has made Swedbank not only one of the safest in Europe, as judged by the thickness of its cushion of capital, but also one of the most profitable.

    European banks are struggling. Economic growth is low; regulators demand ever more capital, and negative interest rates, which most banks do not dare to pass on to depositors, squeeze margins. All this, bankers tell aggrieved shareholders, has inevitably pushed returns far below their pre-crisis levels. Yet Swedbank has defied the inevitable. It is nearly twice as profitable as the average European bank, despite holding twice as much capital on a risk-weighted basis (see chart). Last month it announced profits for the first quarter of SKr4.31 billion ($510m), well above market expectations and virtually the same as last year (SKr4.32 billion), before Sweden and the euro zone adopted negative rates. This was doubly unexpected given the sudden departure of the bank’s CEO in February, amid criticism of his policing of suspected conflicts of interest among the staff.

    Underlying the bank’s success is the idea that in the post-crisis world, running a retail bank is not that different from running a utility. The business strategy is simple: sell lots of dull, low-risk products while keeping operating costs as low as possible. Of its 8m customers, 7m are households. Mortgages make up 60% of its loan book. Although there is plenty that banks cannot control, Swedbank focuses relentlessly on what it can: cost and risk.

    “Hard and sweaty work” is the only way forward, says Goran Bronner, the bank’s CFO. Swedbank has cut its staff by a third since 2009; slashed the number of branches in Sweden (it also operates in the Baltic states) from over 1,000 in 1997 to 275 today, and made all but eight of those completely cashless. Discipline on spending pervades the bank, from procurement (switching phone companies recently reduced its telecom bills by 58%) to staffing (it is moving part of the workforce to the Baltics, where wages are up to 70% lower). It is over halfway through a two-year plan to reduce group expenditure by SKr1.4 billion. The $1.6m salary of the new CEO, Birgitte Bonnesen, is modest for the industry.

    As a result of this frugality, Swedbank has a cost-to-income ratio of 43%, meaning that 57% of the money it takes in can be distributed to shareholders or reinvested. This is over 16 percentage points more than the average for the EU as a whole. The Baltic branches are even more efficient, thanks in part to even greater use of digital banking than in Sweden.

    The bank’s efforts to move customers from branches and phones to websites and apps are crucial to its success. In the future people may well only visit a branch once every five years, suggests Ms Bonnesen, who believes “extreme efficiency”, abetted by , is the nub of retail banking. Across the road from Swedbank’s headquarters, in a converted warehouse, 200 developers and business managers flit from breakout areas to meeting pods, planning this lean but customer-pleasing future. One of their most popular creations is the “shake for balance” function on Swedbank’s app, which allows users to shake their phones to find out how much money they have in their account. It is used 30m times a month.

     

     

     
  • user 3:35 pm on May 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , EPFL, , Lagging, , , , technology   

    Switzerland Is Lagging Behind on Digitalization, Says New EPFL Study 

    While is a global leader in many sectors, the country is on , according to a new .

    In a new report released today, the Ecole polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne () &; on behalf of Swisscom and SIX &8211;, explores Switzerland&;s current digital landscape and details how it can benefit from future technological developments.

    Switzerland Digitalization report Swisscom SIX EPFLThe document, entitled &;Switzerland&8217;s digital future &8211; Facts, challenges and recommendation,&8217; suggests that although Switzerland is recognized as one of the world&8217;s most competitive economies, the country is lesser known for its information sector or for its influence in the digital economy area.

    &;The EPFL study clearly shows that although Switzerland is well placed globally, we are not in an overly strong position either,&; Urs Schaeppi, CEO of Swisscom, commented on the research findings. &8220;We need to take action today so that we do not miss the opportunity to harness the technologies of the future.&8221;

    The report focuses on five current trends in digitalization: digital infrastructure, startup ecosystem, data governance, the digitalization of the public sector, and societal trends. It aims at identifying Switzerland&8217;s strengths and weaknesses in the global landscape.

    Findings suggest that Switzerland has a strong and highly competitive ICT infrastructure, but at the same time, is constrained by strict regulatory requirements and costs regarding mobile broadband.

    The report also points out that there are still untapped opportunities in relation to data management as Switzerland has an excellent reputation globally for responsible data management and effective data protection. Therefore, it is ideally positioned to become a global &8220;safe haven for data&8221; and a prime location for &8220;big data&8221; centers.

    When it comes to the entrepreneurial spirit, however, the study found that Swiss people are lagging behind the likes of the US, for instance, which has a strong startup culture. The Swiss startup ecosystem has not emerged yet, the report . It notes that changes in funding and taxing startups would help make the country more attractive to creative, tech-oriented companies.

    The report also suggests that current legal framework is holding back digital progress. It notes that the country&8217;s relatively high level of regulation can pose a barrier to digital process. Additionally, e-government is relatively underdeveloped is Switzerland and represents an untapped opportunity for the Administration and the economy.

    Some of the barriers to achieving success and becoming a major player in digitalization, are not specific to Switzerland, though. For instance, the report notes that digital literacy and readiness should be promoted through dedicated programs.

    The report also lists a number of recommendations in order for Switzerland to fully benefit from technological developments.

    Among these recommendations, the document suggests an increase in private and public infrastructure investments in mobile broadband. It also advises for the promotion of the attractiveness of Switzerland&8217;s infrastructure for finance-oriented digital infrastructure.

    Switzerland should further improve and promote its position as a secure trusted center of corporate and individual data.

    Furthermore, new funding mechanisms must be introduced to fill the gap between seed money and large investments.

    &8220;Switzerland&8217;s digital future will depend on citizens, policy makers, and entrepreneurs at the local and global level,&8221; the report concludes.

     

    Featured image: Man holding social object by chanpipat, via Shutterstock.com.

    The post Switzerland Is Lagging Behind on Digitalization, Says New EPFL Study appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 8:08 am on May 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , technology   

    Nets explores blockchain technology in cooperation with Coinify – PR 

    Two of Europe’s biggest players in digital and payments, Nets and Coinify respec=vely, are joining forces where Coinify will develop integrated blockchain solutions for Nets.

    Nets has entered into a partnership with company Coinify by establishing a ‘Blockchain Development Lab’ in order to iden8fy business opportunities in the field of blockchain . The partnership involves cooperating with internationally renowned experts in this field of technology with the intention to develop a number of proof of concepts as the basis for developing specific products and services.

    Coinify ApS is the largest facilitator of blockchain payments in Europe and supports more than 20 payment service providers reaching over 100,000 online businesses. Coinify payments support up to 17 blockchain currencies and offer payouts to their customers in local currencies. At the same time, Coinify also provides consumer and corporate trading of digital currencies, such as . As such, Coinify is the leading provider of blockchain payment services in Europe and Asia, and is among the top four worldwide in this field.

    “We see potential in blockchain technology, so obviously we need to gain a thorough understanding of it and the possibilities it offers. Coinify is a leader in the development of products based on this technology and we believe they are the right partner to help us inves8gate the possibilities of developing customer-oriented products and services based on it,”says Jan C. Plenge, Senior Vice President with responsibility for Digital innovation at Nets.

    Blockchain is a decentralised technology which can be used, among other things, as documentation of direct bilateral digital transfers, or to document ownership of contracts, deeds, etc. By joining forces, Nets and Coinify seek to clarify how this technology could be applied commercially and within existing regulatory frameworks, particularly within the same high-level security requirements that Nets already applies to other value transactions.

    “It is important for Nets to closely monitor new digital technologies to be aware of the possibilities, even if that means blockchain technology could poten8ally challenge parts of our exis8ng business. For many years, we have been the ones delivering the latest payment solutions to , and we intend to keep it that way, going forward,” Jan C. Plenge continues.

    Regarding the partnership, CEO and Co-founder of Coinify Mark Højgaard comments: “Nets is the leader when it comes to digital payments in the Nordic region and we are delighted with this new partnership, and believe that, together with Nets, we will be able to develop a number of first-class products and services that will ultimately benefit both merchants and consumers.”

    About Coinify

    Coinify ApS operates as a blockchain payment service provider with focus on extending blockchain currency payment processing and trading services to merchants and consumers respectively. Coinify serves global Payment Service Providers, online businesses, physical shops, and individuals. The company incorporated in 2014 and is backed by a multimillion dollar capital injection from SEED Capital (funded by the Danish government) and Accelerace. Headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark, Coinify is a leading blockchain payment service provider (bPSP) with strong presence on the European and Asian markets.

    Visit http://www.coinify.com for more information.

    About Nets

    Nets’ ambi8on is to connect banks, companies and consumers through innova8ve digital payment solu8ons. We are behind the Dankort, Betalingsservice and NemID, for example. We cover the Nordic and Baltic regions, delivering a whole raft of services in the field of card payments, account transfers and payment solutions for merchants. Nets employs 2,500 staff and turnover in 2015 was DKK 6.8 billion.

    Read more at http://www.nets.eu.

     

     
  • user 3:43 am on May 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , Read, technology, Webpages   

    10 Must Read Bitcoin and Blockchain Blogs and Webpages 

    As bitcoin/blockchain technology is gaining much traction from the financial world and beyond, a number of dedicated online publications and have emerged to share expert commentary and industry news.

    Today, we&;ve made a list of the top 10 and online publications and blogs to follow to keep up with this fast-paced industry:

    Check also out our lists: &;Top 10 Fintech News Sites and Blogs&; and  “15 Insightful Fintech Blogs You Might Not Know“  and &8220;Top 10 Fintech Books&8221;

    CoinDesk

    Coindesk logo bitcoin blockchain publication

    Founded in 2013 by serial entrepreneur Shakil Khan, CoinDesk is a news site focusing on bitcoin and digital currencies and undoubtedly one of the world&8217;s leading blockchain-centric online publications.

    CoinDesk covers news and analysis on the trends, price movements, technologies, companies and people in the bitcoin and digital currency world.

    In January 2016, CoinDesk was acquired by Digital Currency Group.

    Bitcoin Magazine

    Bitcoin Magazinebitcoin magazine logo bitcoin blockchain news publication

    is the oldest source of news, information and expert commentary on Bitcoin, the blockchain and the digital currency industry.

    Founded in 2012 by Vitalik Buterin and Mihai Alisie, Bitcoin Magazine provides analysis, research, education, and thought leadership at the intersection of finance and .

    Bitcoin Magazine was acquired by BTC Media in January 2015.

    The LTB Network

    bitcoin magazine logo bitcoin blockchain news publication

    The LTB Network is a publishing network created for content providers to present the ideas and people involved in the world.

    The publishing platform is built on token-controlled access technology developed by the team at Tokenly.com which allows contributors to be rewarded with LTBCoin, the official token of the network.

    Founded by Adam B. Levine, The LTB Network started with the Let&8217;s Talk Bitcoin podcast.

    Brave New Coin

    Brave New Coin bitcoin blockchain blog

    Based in Australia, Brave New Coin is a company that specializes in digital assets and market data.

    The company operates a news portal that covers the digital currency and blockchain industry and has published a number of featured articles by renowned contributors such Chris Skinner.

    CryptoCoinsNews

    CryptocoinsnewsCryptocoinsnews logo bitcoin blogs

    (CCN) is an independent news source focusing on bitcoin, digital currencies and blockchain technology. It is a popular source of cryptocurrency news, with writings often cited in other mainstream and economic publications.

    Founded in 2013 by Jonas Borchgrevink, CCN is part of PF Wetting, a company registered in Oslo, Norway, which also owns and operates Hacked, an online publication specializing in cryptography and IT security news.

    NewsBTC

    NewsBTC bitcoin blog

    Founded in October 2013, NewsBTC is an online publication covering cryptocurrency news, technical analysis and forecasts for bitcoin, litecoin, dash, doge and other digital currencies.

    It is one of the fastest news services in the industry and has been mentioned in publications such as TechCrunch, CNN, Forbes, Business Insiders, and others.

    AVC

    Fred Wilson VC blogger blockchain bitcoin

    AVC.com is the personal website of renowned American businessman, venture capitalist and blogger Fred Wilson.

    Wilson, the co-founder of and a partner at Union Square Ventures and Flatiron Partners, has been blogging since 2003.

    His blog covers a wide range of topics including venture capital, politics, mobile technologies, crowdfunding, wearables, robots and drones, and of course bitcoin and blockchain technology.

    Ripple Insights

    Ripple blog Insights blockchain

    Ripple is without a doubt one of the hottest startups right now. Having raised over US$ 38 millions from the likes of Andreessen Horowitz, CME Group, IDG Capital Partners and Lightspeed Venture Partners, the company has received a number of awards and distinctions for its groundbreaking distributed ledger technology that promises to allow and financial institutions clear and settle transactions in real-time via a distributed network.

    The Ripple payments network and protocol has been adopted by a number of financial services firms and is being tested by a number of banks around the world including in Australia, Asia and Europe.

    Its blog delivers company updates but also insights on the blockchain space and the impact of technology on the financial services industry.

    MoneyBeat (The Wall Street Journal)

    wsj_moneybeat_bitcoin blockchain fintech blogs

    The Wall Street Journal&8217;s MoneyBeat is a blog that provides analysis and news stories about the financial world.

    Bitcoin and blockchain-related news and stories are predominantly covered by financial reporter Paul Vigna.

    Vigna, along with former WSJ journalist Michael J. Casey, are the authors of &8220;The Age of Cryptocurrency,&8221; a publication released in early-2015 that explores the world of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.

    FT Alphaville (The Financial Times)

    FT Alphaville bitcoin news blog

    FT Alphaville is a free daily news and commentary service of the Financial Times. FT Alphaville has four core components: news and commentary, morning briefing notes, markets live and the Long Room, an exclusive comment and analysis arena.

    Its &8220;Bitcoinmania&8221; section, led by financial journalist Izabella Kaminska, covers the latest news as well as the history of Bitcoin.

     

    Top bitcoin blockchain blogs & Webs 2016

    The post 10 Must Read Bitcoin and Blockchain Blogs and Webpages appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 3:35 pm on May 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , technology   

    Morgan Stanley Shares Roadmap for Blockchain Adoption 

    While the long-term opportunity offered by is clear, widespread by financial institutions will take between 5 and 10 years from now, according to .

    Morgan Stanley Global Insight blockchain techIn a new report entitled &;Global Insight: Blockchain in Banking: Disruptive Threat or Tool?&;, Morgan Stanley a timeline for blockchain adoption.

    The financial services firm believes 2016-2018 will be the years during which and corporations will be testing use cases of blockchain. These proof-of-concept tests will be aimed at assessing if blockchain can scale and effectively reduce costs.

    During the years 2017-2020, we will begin to see shared infrastructure emerge, with proven assets being adopted well beyond the initial proof-of-concept stage.

    Between 2021-2025, more assets will move onto blockchain as efficiencies prove out.

    Morgan Stanley's roadmap for adoption of blockchain by financial institutions

     

    Use cases being explored

    According to a report by Magister Advisors, financial institutions are expected to spend over US$ 1 billion on blockchain projects in 2017.

    Among the proposed applications, blockchain is expected to provide greater efficiencies for post-trade settlement and change in title, but also trade finance, international payments and regulatory.

    Post-trade settlement: A distributed ledger could enhance the audit function as specific securities are more easily tracked. The technology could enable all participants to see where the documents are in the sequenced approval process. Additionally, there are opportunities to shorten the settlement window which would allow for lower costs to trade.

    Trade finance: Using a blockchain would allow all parties to see when the goods have been shipped and release funding appropriately.

    International payments: Moving to a blockchain would shorten settlement periods, speed up transactions and reduce the risk of fraud.

    Reference data: Blockchain technology could offer significant efficiencies to transactors by holding reference data for individual securities.

    Regulatory: A blockchain hosting the data for regulator could be more efficient for banks assessing the data intra-firm as well as for regulators wanting to compare their regulated entities.

     

    10 challenges to overcome

    While blockchain technology has the potential to offer many benefits for the financial industry, there are still key hurdles to surmount before blockchain implementation becomes a reality.

    Use case cost benefit: Given the high cost of building a blockchain system, an proposed use must have a position return on invested capital.

    Cost mutualization: If a shared blockchain were to work like an interoperable industry utility, banks would need to share the cost of building the infrastructure, which could be a challenge.

    Aligning incentives: In the case of a shared blockchain, different entities may have conflicting priorities.

    Evolving to the right standards.

    Maintaining scalability: A blockchain must scale effectively from proof-of-concept to succeed, a key reason why most new blockchain proposals are looking at a range of rules, including ones that restrict users or centralize all, or part, of the blockchain.

    Governance: A blockchain would need a governing body to decide who can access the blockchain and who are in charge of maintenance.

    Regulation: The challenge of regulating digital identities and cross-border standards would need to be addressed.

    Legal risks (KYC/AML): Banks and policymakers need close control for KYC and AML issues. Finding a single digital identity passport authorizer will be key

    Security: Banks will have to perform extensive research to ensure that any blockchain they implement is at least as resilient as their current infrastructure against attack.

    Simplicity: Blockchain solutions need to be uncomplicated and easy to understand. They also need to interface with other parts of the parts of the technology chain seamlessly, enabling faster set-up time, training time and fixing time.

     

    Featured image: Morgan Stanley in Canary Wharf by Gordon Bell, via Shutterstock.com.

    The post Morgan Stanley Shares Roadmap for Blockchain Adoption appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami