Tagged: technology Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 6:00 am on May 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: axa, , , technology   

    Blockchain & Insurance: early thoughts 

    . 10 letters of headache, 10 letters of wonder. Over the last few years and months, this technological piece of art has been gaining traction among developers, journalists and citizens. And quite naturally, the blockchain hype has also knocked on the doors of : our corporate venture capital fund AXA Strategic Ventures invested in Blockstream, our trend sensing outposts AXA Labs reported a lot of activity in the field and I led an internal effort by the AXA Foresight squad to raise awareness on the and its potential.

    What do insurers basically do for their consumers? They collect money from policyholders, manage it and run a process of claims to re-allocate the pooled money to the relevant policyholders. Now Blockchain allows to program trust in a distributed way, which threatens the central role of insurers in the current process. If we consider the barriers to entry in the insurance sector, the disruptive potential of Blockchain is even more striking: capital constraints could be overcome by crowdfunded Decentralized Autonomous Organizations; claims management could be automated through smart contracts; the power of the brand would disappear as trust can be programmed; actuarial skills could be replaced by open logs of claims and data science.

    If we look at the topic through the lens of the value chain, the disrupting power of Blockchain is all the more tangible:

    1. Product design: blockchain-based products will hold more promises to customers (e.g. instant payments) than traditional ones

    2. Pricing: as blockchain allows transparency of information, a combination of Blockchain and Data Science could allow dynamic price adjustments

    3. Distribution: Blockchain could become a new distribution channel, as blockchain players sell services that combine well with insurance (e.g. stadium ticketing through Colu could be complemented with an additional stadium insurance option linked to the ticket)

    4. Underwriting: automated contracts combined with blockchain-based identification tools such as tradle.io or uPort could enable advanced insurers to close a sale in no time

    5. Claims management: with simplified products and smart contracts, the first blockchain insurers will potentially post expense ratios much lower than incumbents, all the more if back office is automated too (e.g. blockchain-based automated request for claim adjustment)

    Obviously, insurers do not only offer plain coverage but also services that Blockchain will have a harder time disrupt. I nonetheless take very seriously initiatives like Dynamis (a blockchain-based unemployment insurer) for several reasons: those initiatives are led by skilled people that should be considered our benchmark in terms of blockchain mastering ; such disruptors are able to get round incumbents strongholds and willing to recreate the insurance industry from scratch, which makes any condescending attitude towards them highly dangerous; they invent new classes of products (in the case of Dynamis, through leveraging LinkedIn), which can be beneficial to the whole insurance industry.

    “With a good deal of work and humility, insurance incumbents can also thrive on Blockchain”

    With a good deal of work and humility, I believe insurance incumbents can also take advantage of the vast opportunities of Blockchain: we could help blockchain users better secure their private keys, act as oracles (i.e. trusted data providers) for disruptors, or improve user experience through more trusted and rapid claim handling. Assistance companies could provide field services for pure players like slock.it (Ethereum-based renting solution), thus providing incumbents with their fair share in the success of disruptors.

    “Blockchain is a great promise. Let’s deliver it”

    Blockchain is a promise for our consumers. A promise of undisputed trust, a promise of radical efficiency, a promise of smart insurance products. Keeping those promises cannot be anything else than a tremendous opportunity for insurers. Let’s get to work!


     
  • user 9:40 pm on May 28, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , technology   

    Blockchain? For me, the coin has dropped 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAf6AAAAJDYxM2U4ZmFiLTAwZWEtNGY0Yi05YTYwLWQ2NjM3ODgyYTQzYQ

    We know by now that tech-land moves at lightning speed. Radio commercials for Digital Transformation consultancy? Check. I’ve heard them.

    But over the past few months, there’s been some technological advancements – in the relative margins of the internet – which could potentially cause quite a fundamental stir. I’m talking about .

    First a big caveat: I’m not a techie. I can pretend I know the difference between NodeJS and PHP, but I don’t really gét it. I look at for what it means. And recently, I’ve come to realise that this whole Blockchain story is a lot more than Bitcoins, ‘virtual’ currencies and unintelligible tech-geek-babble.

    Blockchain, WTF?

    The techies will kill me, but let me have an attempt at trying to explain what Blockchain is, to me, the non-techie. Blockchain is a kind of database-technology, the engine behind for example. It is effectively a decentralised verification system, where a global network of computers verifies and creates transactions, following a complex cryptographic code. Once verified, the transaction cannot be changed. Ever.

    Sounds like Chinese? Just remember one thing: ‘decentralised’. It means that transactions no longer need a centralised authority.

    There are a few Blockchain versions. And a crucial one is Ethereum. The thing that makes Ethereum different from Bitcoin is that it is effectively a platform, onto which applications can be built. Those applications can utilise such a decentralised computer network ánd the cryptography that comes with it. Ethereum also has a currency, Ether, which serves as the fuel for the system, this engine.

    The thing that made me pay attention is that the platform, this network of computers, can create transactions that go beyond digital currencies. The Bitcoin-blockchain does one thing: transfer Bitcoin. But with Ethereum anything’s possible; we’re talking ‘transactions’, any transaction. A crucial aspect of Ethereum is Smart Contracts, programs to well… program and automate transactions. At least, that’s what I think it is.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAd4AAAAJDU1N2FkNmE5LTc2YWQtNGU2ZS05MzVmLWRjMjZhZmI5ZDI0OA

    Example? In Brooklyn, smart citizens have built an energy network with Ethereum’s Smart Contracts. Energy, created by solar panels on one side of the street, is being sold to neighbours on the other side of the street. Again: without the involvement of a central authority.

    “That all sounds grand, dear Gerrie. So let them be, those tech geeks”, I hear you think. Well, no. Over the past few weeks I’ve started to get the feeling that as an entrepreneur, government or all round smart person, it is becoming important to stop watching from the sidelines and get more actively involved in this blockchain story. And I see a few reasons.

    Speedy, speedier, speediest

    The tempo at which new things happen in the blockchain world is very, very, very high. Ethereum as software isn’t even a year old. Friends of mine, who’ve been reading on and working in the subject matter for a while now, were perplexed a few weekends ago. That was the moment when the DAO-hub launched. A kind of platform, built on Ethereum to fund and support other blockchain projects. Kind of like a decentralised version of a Venture Capital fund. At least, that’s what I think it is. Today. Maybe I’ll understand it better tomorrow.

    But fact is: after 2 weeks it had become the biggest crowdfunding project ever, raising more than 11m million Ether. Current value of 1 Ether: about 12 euros. These are no longer the margins of the internet, methinks.

    Profit!

    Ethereum’s website says: “like the internet was supposed to work”. Their mission is to develop an internet that is more free, more trustworthy. It is definitely connected to a certain vision of the world. But at the same time, it’s also about profit, making money and business opportunities. That’s what makes it so unique. I think.

    For every old school CEO who still doesn’t really believe in the internet or e-commerce, there are smart entrepreneurs who will soon (read: now) start looking at how the transactions involved in for instance ‘shopping in a supermarket’ can be reconfigured when you look at them through a Blockchain lens.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAeSAAAAJDhlNzlhY2VmLWEyOTEtNDU5Ny05YTA2LThiZTY1NDdhYmQ4Mg

    Plus, these transactions aren’t limited to the internet. Connect the Blockchain concept to the internet of things and you’ve just added another billion use cases. At Slock.it – a bunch of leading thinkers and makers in the community – people are working on a smart lock, which only acts when all the conditions of a Smart Contract have been fulfilled.

    Take the use case AirBnb. I rent a spare room to you. So when the smart lock know it’s you and it knows you’ve paid, it opens up. At the same time it triggers the financial transaction and – why not – books and pays the cleaning service when you leave.

    Another fundamental aspect is that there’s an incentive system built into the core of Blockchain. It is technology after all and that requires hardware. Computer geeks who run the transaction software on their servers get a fee. That’s what keeps the decentralised network rolling. However, the fee is a fraction of the 10-ish% that AirBnB charges or the +20% that Uber deducts from its drivers’ earnings.

    A real sharing economy

    We need to pay attention because Blockchain is a technology that goes to the core, to the root. The word “revolution” gets mentioned occasionally. So does “Web 3.0”.

    And without getting all too excited, I’m starting to see why. The internet was about disintermediation and the democratisation of information etc. But what happened? It became the bedrock for centralised platforms, who facilitated transactions at scale: AirBnB for holiday accommodation, Facebook for communications, Uber for transport,… At a price obviously.

    These are amazing applications and I use use all of them. But the decentralised aspect of the blockchain technology makes it possible to redraw and reconfigure the relationships between user and supplier, in other words: the transaction as well as its value.  The cost of a transaction decreases. The validation and the trust grows. An “internet of transactions”, “internet of trust”, “internet of value”,… these are all phrases that are being used in the numerous chat boxes and communities.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAdKAAAAJGU2ZjNkMjgyLTVkMjEtNDQ0My1iNWJhLWI0YTAxOTFiMTFkMw

    Example! Consensys is one of those companies who are building applications on the Ethereum framework. Ujo is one of them, “rebuilding the music industry”. Not only does it make the transaction between artist and fan more direct; it can also reconfigure the relationship between artist and session musician, between artist and film-producer-who-wants-to-use-that-song, between artist and whoever or whatever,… It’s not something Spotify is doing.

    Arcade City does in a blockchain kind of way what Uber does: match demand for transport solutions to supply. The difference: the value is being distributed in another way.

    Certainly, these are all experiments and prototypes. But it is significant that AirBnB has already bought up a Blockchain start-up. Their business model of ‘being the intermediary’ could potentially come under pressure.

    The disruptors being disrupted? What’s next? Well, everything that’s a transaction can be looked at through a blockchain lens. Could a brand like Nike pay fees directly to people who watch their ads? And what with a concept like ‘issuing a driving license’, a typical example of centralised validation ánd transaction.

    Learn, Unlearn, Relearn

    Technology. Ethics. Profit. That’s what it says on the website of DAO Hub. And it’s this mix that makes the matter so complex.

    So, show of hands: who has ever tried to buy BitCoin or Ether and moved them to a different wallet? I have a sneaky feeling it won’t be too many of you. And that’s a shame: because ‘that world’ involves different concepts of wallets, transactions, security,… So we have to practice, we have to get used to this new ‘language’, we have to make mistakes, get ripped off, be confused.

    Because to be honest: buying Bitcoins is peanuts, compared to understanding Ethereum. And then we haven’t even started on DAO, the concept of a Decentralised Autonomous Organisation.

    So, us, non-technies, need to practice, because this story is getting momentum.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAdvAAAAJDVlNGQ2NGQ5LTIyZmQtNDQwMC1iNjJjLTEwMTlkMjc4YzE1NA

    Smart developers are currently learning Solidity to build blockchain-applications and create Smart Contracts.

    Smart investors have known for a while who Vitalik Buterin is (inventor of Ethereum, 22 years old, no shit). They’ve been looking at daohub.org for the past few weeks and have been able to decide for themselves whether it’s a good idea to invest in DAO-tokens.

    And what do entrepreneurs do? From small start-ups to the Microsofts and IBMs of this world: they’re all trying to get to grips with the blockchain-thinking. The question is: do they recalibrate their value proposition and their added value in a fundamental way? Or are they copying Blockchain technology to implement behind closed doors, like seem to be doing?

    And what about governments? Because when it comes to transactions, validation ánd identity, there’s a lot of thinking to be done. In Honduras they’re re-building the concept of land ownership on the blockchain. The innovation unit of Unicef is looking at blockchain to tackle the problem of identity with refugees.

    But also closer to home, the penny has dropped. In my hometown of Antwerp, the council’s innovation unit A-Labs is building a blockchain application to facilitate communities. They call it Locals.world and are working on a currency of their own, the LocalCoin.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAjIAAAAJDQyMGY2MjM2LWMzNTQtNGE5My1hNDQ3LTMyOTE1MzZiMmY3ZA

    In the blockchain chat communities, where I spend a bit of time these days, I read things like:

    “I’m kind of dreaming of buying Tesla powerwall towers and put smart contracts on them!”

    Or

    “We could invest in anything and collectively we’d be more informed than an individual to make good investment decisions.”

    These guys are on a different level. And if we, laymen, want to get our hands on the wheel, we need to get flight time. We need to read, produce, buy, do. It’s up to us to understand blockchain and to translate it, take it away from the tech-talk. That way the discussion and the learning process will speed up and the possible implementations will become clear much faster.

    Anyway, I’m starting to get it. Starting. And I’m going to dig deeper. If you’re interested, here‘s my growing list of blockchain-related bookmarks.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerriesmits” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Gerrie Smits”] is Digital Strategy Consultant (www.gerriesmits.com) and this post first appeared in Dutch on datanews.be)

     
  • user 3:35 pm on May 28, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , technology   

    Blockchain – to Replace Government in Real Estate 

    When it comes to , the immutable ledger that underpins , much of the limelight thus far has been on its potential to disrupt the finance industry. However, the transformation that may experience from applying blockchain could arguably be just as profound. Unlike financial services, where technological innovation has largely been embraced in the pursuit of profit, much of real estate’s business conduct remains firmly stuck in the past. Many operating methods within the industry have remained unchanged for 50 years, if not longer.

     

    What is a land-registry in a blockchain?

    Land registry systems contain records of a country’s land transactions, and operate on centralized ledger systems at present, with the centralized entity normally being a agency. At their best, the systems guarantee title of all land assets; however, in reality they provide incomplete security of tenure, are marred by corruption and frequently result in ownership disputes. In contrast, a blockchain land registry system would be decentralized.

    This would mark a distinct improvement on the incumbent system, in that every authorized network member would have an authenticated copy of the registry, rather than just one centralized party. Given that everyone can see the records, therefore, the process would be more transparent, which again minimizes the potential for foul play. Removal of the centralized entity is also likely to be cheaper and more efficient – the operating cost of the land registry in England and Wales in 2013/14, for example, was nearly £240 million.

    Ragnar Lifthrasir, who is President of the International Bitcoin Real Estate Association (IBREA), is among the pioneers in developing a real estate model which can operate on the blockchain. He identifies three specific uses of the technology in the industry – purchasing, escrowing and the recording of title ownership and associated transfers. Escrowing is perhaps the least developed idea currently, although ostensibly it would be similar to a common bank transfer, only in this case the transferable amount is first converted to bitcoins which are then put into escrow. Nevertheless, as long as both parties agree to use the blockchain over a government solution, Lifthrasir argues, then nothing can stop them.

     

    What are the benefits?

    A blockchain would allow someone to upload land title documentation to the network, which other users can record and verify if needed. This would provide proof that this person is the first owner of the documents, and decentralised network verification would prevent forgery. When it’s time to transfer title, the document simply requires ‘rehashing’ (encrypting) by the owner to prove he/she is in possession of the document.

    During the actual transfer process, a ‘coloured coin’ system &; which US stock exchange Nasdaq currently uses to settle securities – would be employed. A concept first outlined by Swiss computer scientist and Bitcoin core developer Mike Hearn, coloured coins are non-fungible tokens which provide the owner with private keys, thus allowing only the owner to transfer ownership while preventing fraudsters from corrupting the process.

    The elimination of costs associated with title insurance and fraud, according to Lifthrasir, is the biggest advantage of using blockchain. This has been a persistent problem with the current system of centralised government records. Criminals are able to fake title ownership, often simply by using editing software to stipulate transfer of property ownership in their favour, and at negligible expense. Indeed, title insurance itself is a $ 20 billion industry, and Lifthrasir estimates that at present it is costing around $ 1 billion to combat title fraud.

    Some argue for a replacement of the entire common law system, which currently requires a laborious examination process of public land records before a plot of land is transferred from one party to the other. Joe Dewey and Shawn Amuial, attorneys at US law firm Holland & Knight who specialise in real estate and finance, for instance, are in favour of replacing the government recording of deeds, mortgages and other instruments in land records with the blockchain, as government records are prone to human error and corruption.

     

    Reducing Bribery and Corruption

    Indeed, corruption within land registry has plagued much of the developing world, with insufficiently secure governmental systems being regularly prone to manipulation. Honduras is among the worst. USAid Land Tenure estimates that 80% of privately held Honduran land is untitled or improperly titled, while only 14% of citizens legally occupy properties, with less than a third of those citizens being officially registered. Land title disputes in Honduras have led to violent conflict and widespread fraud, with cases of the registry system databases being hacked into and bureaucrats being able to secure the most luxurious properties.

    As a solution, US technology start-up Factom announced in May 2015 that it had agreed to build a secure land title record system for the Honduran government using blockchain technology, in conjunction with title software company Epigraph. Transferring land records onto the blockchain, therefore, could be a reality in the not too distant future.

    In doing so, Factom CEO Peter Kirby believes that Honduras’ land registry system would leapfrog many systems in the developed world. Although recent reports suggest that the partnership has stalled, Factom is adamant that progress is still being made, so it may take longer for the project to come to fruition than initially thought.

    Ghanaian NGO Bitland also claims to be developing a blockchain-based system for entering land title records, in a bid to correct for the numerous failed attempts by the government to develop a fair and efficient land administration system. At present, courts in Ghana are reportedly being inundated with land dispute cases.

    Bitland hopes to reduce this burden, and will use the Factom/Epigraph technology, as well as satellites and GPS to verify the accuracy of plots of land. Buyers will also be able to discover the last owner of property rights and land ownership disputes, while the disputes themselves can be made visible to the network, thus ensuring greater security. However, as with Honduras, much work is yet to be done.

    Registry system problems, moreover, are not solely confined to the developing world. The US State of Massachusetts has a specific court which has jurisdiction over the registration of title to real property, while in Canada, 95% of land in Newfoundland and Labrador is considered Crown Land, which results in land disputes regularly ending up in court. Kirby believes that the most important issue is for courts to have a true history of what has happened during such land dispute cases. Immutable records based on “evidence and precedent” will be instrumental in adjudicating land disputes, and can also then become part of the permanent record of the land, which the blockchain technology can ensure.

    In terms of taking land title records away from government and onto the blockchain, it may prove to be more difficult in some countries than others. In the US, for instance, title companies exist and have large databases of land ownership records, in addition to the government’s own records.

    The sheer number of landowners (and thus the number of records), coupled with the overall size of the US, makes the task of shifting from government records to blockchain a lot tougher. However, Dewey and Amiual point to the fact that title companies are likely to act as allies in the technology’s development, rather than enemies, especially if title insurance can still play a role in addressing those risks which are not eliminated by the blockchain.

    Lifthrasir believes blockchain will offer significant improvements over the current government-administered system. It would allow the industry to avoid the inefficiencies that arise from the presiding record keeping practices used by government. While Kirby is willing to work alongside the government in the Honduran case, Lifthrasir does not think it is a worthwhile investment of people’s time to teach governments about blockchain. The opportunity to transact directly under blockchain means that the role of government becomes redundant.

     

    Conclusion

    Instead, IBREA’s intention is to gather together the real estate industry professionals who favour moving elements of the business onto the blockchain, especially operations pertaining to purchasing, escrowing, and recording of transfer of properties. As Lifthrasir puts it, “So, as long as people in the real estate industry start deciding to use the Bitcoin blockchain to record the transfer of properties, why bother with the delay, cost, and inefficiency of the government?” He is convinced that 2016 will be the year that title management moves onto the blockchain, and in turn, that the technology is developed enough to be used in the real estate industry.

    The post Blockchain &8211; to Replace Government in Real Estate appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 11:37 am on May 28, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , technology   

    From Blockchain PoCs to commercial launch 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAkYAAAAJGIzZjJlZGMyLWFlZmItNGIzMS05ZTcwLTAzODkyMGQyMTFiZg

    People working in big companies experimenting with we receive PoC proposals every week, and in most cases the selling argument is always how cheap the is, with phrases like “you don´t need any special integration, we can set up a private network or a public node in this or that cloud” (always very well known clouds with Blockchain as a Service offering). I always wonder the value of those PoCs not integrated with core systems or at least  with a sandbox environment.

    Most PoCs I have seen so far not take into account the security and regulatory requirements when launching a financial service into production

    I mean, when we decided to build our own blockchain banking infrastructure the goal was to build a blockchain platform that meets banking security architectural standards and is easy to integrate with existing core banking so that going into production could be done straight away. The first thing we did was to hold meetings with our architects to understand our current architecture (fo both the core banking and digital extensions) with the special focus on the security, APIs and microservices pieces. After those meetings, we realised that we had to change some of our initial assumptions for the blockchain technical design, based on the PoCs we had run outside the banking infrastructure.

    The problem is that this technology was born to replace the banking industry and most start-ups and IT vendors have no real experience in the banking industry and the requirements around security in payments or customers personal data and credentials, or they just suggest you to abandon the current core banking and use blockchain as a standalone piece.  So, most PoCs I have seen so far not take into account the security and regulatory requirements when launching a financial service into production, or even worse a profitable business model (but profitability is another story I may write about in future). At the end, all the work done during the PoC is not valid and has to be thrown away and remanufactured from scratch.

    When designing a PoC we must take into account the requirements for integration with the IT systems

    So, my humble recommendation when designing a PoC we must take into account the requirements for integration with the IT systems since it can impact the customer experience, platform productivity, and even the investment costs/ business case when going live. Otherwise, the movement from PoC to commercial pilot/ launch could be a nightmare.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://es.linkedin.com/in/roberto-garc%C3%ADa-938a333″ connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Roberto García”]  is Innovation Manager at Santander Group (IT&Operations Global Division)

     
  • user 7:36 am on May 28, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , technology   

    Five Myths About the Blockchain Revolution 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAexAAAAJGI0MjQ0YTBkLWIwMmQtNGIxZi1iODFhLTM3NDMzZjBjNjliOQBy Don Tapscott and Alex Tapscott, co-authors, Revolution.

    Blockchain is the most important invention in computing in a generation because, for the first time in human history, we have at our disposal a truly native digital medium for peer-to-peer value exchange. Blockchain, a vast global platform based on a distributed ledger, establishes the rules — in the form of computations and heavy duty encryption — that enable two or more parties to transact or do business without needing a third party to establish trust.

    Rather than relying on a bank, government or other intermediary to create trust, the blockchain ensures it through mass collaboration and clever code. Trust is built into the system, which is why we call blockchain the Trust Protocol.

    Taken one step further, the blockchain also acts as a ledger of accounts, a database, a notary, a sentry, and clearing house, all by consensus. We believe it is the second generation of the Internet and holds the potential to rewire the economic power grid and shake up the old order of things for the better.

    Here are the five main myths about blockchains:

    (Read an excerpt of our book, Blockchain Revolution, here.)

    1. Blockchain good, bad

    Many people, especially those in the financial services industry, are excited about the potential of blockchain technology but believe that digital currencies like bitcoin are unfeasible, undesirable or even dangerous.

    Whereas the bitcoin blockchain is entirely permissionless — that is, anyone can access it via an Internet-enabled device and interact with it like they would the open Internet — permissioned blockchains require users to have certain credentials, like a license to operate on that particular blockchain, granted by the members or some governing body. Permissioned blockchains use distributed ledger technology without having a digital currency attached.

    At first blush, these private and permissioned blockchains appear to have a few clear advantages. For one, members can easily change the rules if they so desire, as they only need to get their small group to agree to a change, rather than convincing a huge network of people. Costs can be kept down, as transactions only need validation from the members themselves, not a network of millions of participants. This streamlining could reduce electricity usage too, which is good for the environment. Regulators might also prefer them over public blockchains, like the bitcoin blockchain, because they need not be anonymous or pseudonymous.

    But not so fast. The easier it is to change the rules, the easier it is to flaunt them. Intentionally limiting certain freedoms or access can inhibit neutrality. With no open value innovation, the technology is more likely to stagnate and become vulnerable. Further blockchains tied to a digital currency like bitcoin have a built-in system to incentivize people to do the work necessary to validate transactions.

    2. The main opportunity for blockchains is in the financial services industry.

    The financial services industry can transform itself around blockchain technology, if it can find the leadership to do it. The technology holds great promise to revolutionize the industry — from to credit card networks and everything in between. When everyone shares the same public, distributed ledger, settlements occur instantly for all to see. Banks could speed up the metabolism of the system, and cut out massive costs. The smartest incumbents will use blockchain technology strategically, including permissionless systems to penetrate new markets like the unbanked and bring new services to market.

    Yet financial services are the tip of the iceberg.

    Blockchains can disrupt the disrupters like Uber. They will be at the heart of the Internet of Things — animating the physical world by, for example, allowing smart devices to contract, transact and securely share data peer-to-peer through blockchains.

    They can reinvent democracy by making politicians accountable to citizens through smart contract. Imagine if a politician only received her salary or an appropriation for a project after fulfilling pre-set objectives laid bare in that smart contract. She would be beholden to the people, not powerful interests or donors.

    3. Blockchains are really a B2B thing. They won’t affect me personally.

    We’re convinced that this technology will change our economy, our institutions and day-to-day life in more dramatic ways than the first era of the Internet.

    These are but a few ways blockchain will help you.

    The list goes on.

    4. Blockchains have too many problems for them to be feasible.

    Some say the technology is not ready for prime time; that it’s still hard to use, and that the killer applications are still nascent. Other critics point to the massive amount of energy needed to reach consensus in the network: What happens when thousands or perhaps millions of interconnected blockchains are each processing billions of transactions a day? Are the incentives great enough for people to participate and behave safely over time, and not try to overpower the network? Is blockchain technology the worst job killer ever?

    Our research suggests such concerns should not go into a category called “Reasons why this is a bad idea” but rather into a category called “Implementation challenges.”

    5. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto

    Early this month, Australian entrepreneur Craig Wright claimed to be the pseudonymous creator of bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto.

    We know for a fact that he is not the sole creator. The reason? We — Don Tapscott and Alex Tapscott — are among those who created bitcoin.

    Let us explain. Whomever wrote the original bitcoin paper and protocol got things off the ground. Then he (or she) disappeared, leaving it to an ever-growing community to carry on. This community is now responsible for the vast majority of code and other content related to bitcoin. In that sense, we are all Satoshi.

    Which is why it doesn’t really matter who wrote the original paper. In other open source communities, such as Linux, there is an ultimate arbitrator. Bitcoin, and for that matter all permissionless blockchains, will never have such a benevolent dictator. As such the entire ecosystem needs to take the next steps in achieving bottom-up, self-organizing governance to steward these extraordinary resources forward.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/dontapscott” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Alex Tapscott “] is the founder and CEO of Northwest Passage Ventures. Don Tapscott is CEO of The Tapscott Group and an Inaugural Fellow at the Martin Prosperity Institute at the University of Toronto.

    This post is adapted from Don & Alex Tapscott’s new book, BLOCKCHAIN REVOLUTION: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin is Changing Money, Business, and the World and originally appeared in Thomson Reuters.

    Connect with the Authors on Twitter at @dtapscott and @alextapscott

     
  • user 11:35 pm on May 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , technology   

    The World’s Most Comprehensive Public Blockchain Startup Tracker 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAiJAAAAJGNmYWYxNWFlLWMwMDMtNGNmZS1iZDE0LTVhY2Q1ZWNjZDE1MA

    Today we are officially opening up our database of startups through the launch of a Startup Tracker. With over 760+ startups and growing from across the globe it makes it the World’s largest and most comprehensive public database of its kind.

    Because we at Blockchain Angels are the World’s largest network of professional investors dedicated to blockchain inc. over 400+ angels and VCs, it means startups listed can quickly and easily gain visibility to the most active investors in the space to increase deal-flow. Being able to directly make submissions themselves and keep their profiles up to date as they progress.

    The ecosystem aims to be the go-to resource for investors active in the blockchain space and we have committed teams tracking every public start-up as far back as 2012 including corporate venturing activity. Unlike Coindesk’s data, our data covers everything from basic POCs all the way to Series A.

    ”The feedback was just hearing about those that have completed their Series A round is often too late for investors. They want to see where the innovation is happening and it’s not always in the obvious places. This gives our network an edge which is why many of the top investors use us for insights”.

    Because of the work we do at Blockchain Angels, speaking with at least 2 startups a day, we know who their teams are, the sectors they are targeting, and even what tech stack they are using. Along the way we track if they fold or pivot as well as levels of funding and investment stage.

    By signing up by email you can also receive deeper insights and analysis to track trends and significant events live as they happen in a monthly newsletter from our research team who power the tracker headed by Lawrence Lundy.

    Data can be segmented live in charts at the Blockchain Angels site and can be embedded live in blogs through a handy widget.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAiOAAAAJGM3MjlkZGFmLTQ5NTAtNDczMC05Y2I0LTYwOTYzZDA0YzFjNA

    • If you are an entrepreneur, raise your profile with investors and increase your chances of securing funding as well as be assessed to pitch at a Blockchain Angels event by adding your startup here.
    • If you are an investor, and want to understand the opportunities in the blockchain market sign up here for regular insights including region and country level breakdowns, latest funding rounds, trends and a curated list of the most investable companies.

    An example of some of the insights investors can expect include:

    • The infrastructure layer in the blockchain stack still dominates in terms of total numbers with 42.7% of startups addressing Infrastructure, Financial Exchanges and Trading, and Wallets.
    • The application layer has begun to see huge growth with 4.3% using blockchain technology to provide provenance services across a range of different industries from diamonds, wine and the logistics supply chain.
    • We now see 3.5% of startups applying blockchain technology to Governance & Transparency use cases

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAhoAAAAJDM0NTUxOTFlLTIwYTEtNDM0Ny1hOWY4LWIyZjc0OTZlMDgzMA

    About Blockchain Angels

    Blockchain Angels is a market intelligence and events platform to educate and connect up angel networks and early stage VCs to enable deal-flow for the blockchain community.

    http://www.blockchainangels.eu

    About Outlier Ventures

    Outlier Ventures, the owner of Blockchain Angels, is a blockchain venture builder founded in 2014 which services Outlier Capital LLP to deliver ventures to budget through joint-venturing with a partner ecosystem.


    http://www.outlierventures.io


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamieburke” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Jamie Burke”] is founder of Blockchain Angels, CEO @ Outlier Ventures & Outlier Capital LLC 

     
  • user 7:35 pm on May 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , technology   

    Technology behind Bitcoin is coming to high finance faster than predicted 

    Bitcoins underlying is a potential disruptor to the way core businesses have been working. This is the reason why it has been catching everyone’s attention, especially those involved in the financial services industry. The blockchain technology is in fact driving most innovation by companies in the present time. Start-ups to well-established companies are involved or interested in putting the blockchain technology to use and benefiting from it in some way or the other.

    The idea of applying blockchain technology outside of the realm of has gained a lot of interest from forward-thinking companies in the past year or so. Blockchain applications are also called “distributed ledger technology” because they remove the need for a centralized database and, like Bitcoin, give every transaction in a particular system a cryptographic hash that can be checked by any member of the group.

    In a report published in December, “Beyond the Hype: Blockchain in Capital Markets”, McKinsey said there is great promise in distributed ledger technology but expects that development will require cooperation among market participants, regulators and technologists.

    IBM, Intel, Cisco, J.P. Morgan and several other big are among those making a big bet on blockchain. The companies have joined forces to create the Open Ledger Project with the Linux Foundation, with the goal of re-imagining supply chains, contracts and other ways information about ownership and value are exchanged in a digital economy. The Open Ledger Project is described as a development library that will allow businesses to build custom distributed ledger solutions, without needing to rely on open, public blockchain such as those offered by bitcoin and Ethereum. To show its commitment towards the development IBM has open sourced a significant chunk of the blockchain code it has been working on, putting its weight behind the Linux Foundation and its hyper ledger project.

    R3 (R3CEV LLC)  leading a consortium of 42 financial companies in research and development of blockchain usage in the financial system. The full list of banks signed up are: Banco Santander, Bank of America, Barclays, BBVA, BMO Financial Group, BNP Paribas, BNY Mellon, CIBC, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Citi, Commerzbank, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING Bank, Intesa Sanpaolo, Macquarie Bank, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Mizuho Financial Group, Morgan Stanley, National Australia Bank, Natixis, Nomura, Nordea, Northern Trust, OP Financial Group, Scotiabank, State Street, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Royal Bank of Canada, Royal Bank of Scotland, SEB, Societe Generale, Toronto-Dominion Bank, UBS, UniCredit, U.S. Bancorp, Wells Fargo and Westpac Banking Corporation.

    Last week a consortium of 11 giant banks including UBS and Credit Suisse announced that they had completed their first trial run of the idea of using software inspired by the digital currency Bitcoin to move assets around more efficiently was successful.

    While all this development was going on Bank of America is trying to steal a march on the latest developments in the technology behind digital currency bitcoin by loading up on blockchain-related patents. BOA has already filed for 15 blockchain-related patents and is currently in the process of drafting another 20 to be submitted to the U.S. Patents and Trademark Office (USPTO) later this month.

    Applying the blockchain concept to the world of Finance and IOT offers fascinating possibilities. Right from the time a product completes final assembly till the delivery , payment and service.Blockchain have a part for each process involved in business to make it more efficient, faster and reliable.

    Auxesis a startup from IIT Bombay is a blockchain application development company going to release Btc2Bid for its European partners. We welcome entrepreneurs, managers having ideas related with the Blockchain for a cup of coffee to realize your ideas into products.

    Thanks for reading you can also find me at facebook.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/kumargauravitc” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Kumar”]

     
  • user 3:35 pm on May 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , technology   

    Recommendations to Boost Entrepreneurship in Switzerland 

    While might be one of the best locations in the world to set up a business, the country&;s own ecosystem has not yet reached its full potential, according to the Start-up Monitor foundation.

    In a new report, the Start-up Monitor foundation provides an in-depth analysis of entrepreneurial activities in Switzerland. Founded in 2012 by ETH Zurich, University and St.Gallen and University of Basel, the Start-up Monitor foundation is an organization aimed at monitoring and helping develop the startup ecosystem in Switzerland.

    The Swiss Entrepreneurship Ecosystem report 2015 2016The document, entitled &;The Swiss Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Report 2015/2016,&8217; addresses the strengths and weaknesses of Switzerland&8217;s entrepreneurial scene and suggests that although the country is one of the most competitive and innovative in the world, there are still many challenges to overcome in order to become an internationally recognized &;Start-up Nation.&;

    Switzerland is globally recognized for its stable, transparent and effective institutions, but also its healthy finances, attractive taxes, excellent infrastructure, exceptional capacity for innovation, and world-class education system, and yet, the country does not rank among the most entrepreneurial countries in the world, the report says.

    It notes that due to the lack of growth-stage funding, many startups leave Switzerland at this stage to countries with more favorable conditions. &8220;Switzerland needs to ensure funding opportunities not only for seed-stage, but also for the start-up and growth-stages of a venture,&8221; the report says.

    It advises for more entrepreneurship education programs on primary and secondary level, and notes that there is a strong need to strengthen a supportive entrepreneurial culture, notably among young people, in order for them to consider entrepreneurship as a desirable, feasible and viable career opportunity.

    The document also claims that there is a strong need to focus on ageing workforces, increasing entrepreneurship intentions to prolong working lives and reduce older-age unemployment.

    Moreover, the fact that Switzerland is a relatively small market can cause significant scalability challenges for new ventures.

    Swiss Innovation Park Dübendorf

    The report lists a number of initiatives that have been undertaken to foster the Swiss entrepreneurial spirit, among which the new innovation center set to launch later this year in Dubendorf. The Swiss Innovation Park is a project of the federal government, cantons, science and economy, which will be dedicated to industrial research.

    Another initiative is Digital Zurich 2025, which focuses on turning the greater Zurich area into a leading European center for digital innovation. It aims at being a platform where academics and experts in information and communication would meet and collaborate. Digital Zurich 2025 is also planning an annual congress and a Swiss Investor Summit where startups would have the opportunity to meet with international investors and business leaders.

    Balgrist Campus on the other hand, has recently established a research and development center for medicine located between the lake of Zurich and Balgrist University Hospital.

    Finally, the Swiss Investment Fund (SIF) initiative of the Swiss Private Equity and Corporate Finance Association aims at closing the financing gap and foster innovation entrepreneurship in the Swiss innovation ecosystem. SIF acts as a &8220;fund of funds,&8221; which means that it invests in a number of smaller funds, which in turn, can provide equity capital to a number of young Swiss tech companies.

    That said, Switzerland has got many advantages for businesses as well. In addition to its high innovation capability, Switzerland has a very supportive government, as well as regulations in favor of entrepreneurship.

    Additionally, its geographical location provides young companies with an easy access to the European market and stronger trade links.

     

    Swiss Entrepreneurship Report 2015 2016

     

    Featured image: Zurich pinned on a map of Europe by Dmitry Kaminsky, via Shutterstock.com.

    The post Recommendations to Boost Entrepreneurship in Switzerland appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 2:35 pm on May 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , Receive, Reps, technology   

    US Congress Reps Receive Blockchain Briefing at Capitol Hill Event 

    More than 15 members of met with representatives of the industry this week in Washington, DC.
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 10:01 am on May 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , technology   

    Rising up to the challengers: an insider review of challenger banks. 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAWeAAAAJDc3MDY5OTMwLWZiMDEtNDU2Mi1hNDg2LTczMWYxODQ3OTMxMQChallenger have been a black cloud looming over the “big four” for the past few years. The traditional high street banks have been braced for these challengers to shake things up and create an entirely new environment, just as budget airlines did to the aviation industry in the nineties. And with the FCA keen to see consumers benefit from “effective competition” for regulated financial services, the time seems right. However, while those working in the industry are tracking every move of the challengers and what they offer, this awareness has yet to filter down to customers. With the big four still holding over 90 per cent of the UK market, and consumer awareness of challenger brands failing to gain momentum, is the impending shake-up going to happen, and if so, when?

    The big four are portrayed as clunky behemoths held back from innovating by complicated legacy infrastructure that is creaking at the seams. In just the first few months of 2016, customers of some of the major banks have experienced cashpoint outages, data breaches and system failures. What is interesting, and at odds with consumer behaviour in other industries, is that customers are not reacting by switching brands in their droves to new suppliers – despite the seven-day switch service introduced by the Government in 2013, which makes switching current accounts easier than ever. So why the complacency?

    The path of least resistance?

    New challengers are offering faster, cheaper transactions with greater flexibility than ever – yet customers are still hesitant to switch. Banking is seen by customers as a chore, and many customers lack confidence in financial planning matters. Consequently, spending time researching and understanding different banking products, switching to a new bank or account, and then getting used to a different way of doing things, is something that many customers avoid. This is why UK customers are collectively losing out on £3 billion through money sat in low-interest savings accounts. And it’s why the challengers may well continue to struggle to gain traction against the tried-and-tested big banks.

    Step forward the challengers

    The challengers to traditional retail banking take several forms. First off, supermarket retailers such as Tesco, M&S and Sainsbury’s were quick to head into the banking space with uncomplicated current and savings accounts. It made sense; these are heavily data-rich organisations, putting them in prime position to offer customer-centric services. They have the on-street presence through stores across the UK, and can interact directly with their customers without huge start-up costs.

    The next wave of challengers concentrated on putting the customer at the centre of their communications. Virgin crashed into the market in 1995 with Virgin Money, branding their high street outlets as stores, rather than branches, with a new focus on customers’ individual needs. Metro Bank arrived in 2010, introducing a softer side to the retail banking market with their mission to create “fans not customers”. Growth for these new players has not proven easy, however – Virgin Money only has 75 stores nationally, compared to Lloyds’ network of nearly 1,300 branches – and there has also been a string of banking start-ups that have failed during the same period, the most well-known of which is Prudential Banking’s internet bank, Egg, established in 1998. The costs of creating a high street presence to rival that of the big four make the direct high street challenge almost impossible, and without a high street presence to back them up, online banks have historically struggled to gain traction and retain customers for the long term.

    Don’t talk, tap

    A new breed of mobile-only and mobile-first banks is hoping to reverse those trends and succeed where others have struggled. And in an age where laptops are being replaced by mobile devices, where people trust new brands like never before (think Uber, Netflix and Airbnb), and where we are moving to mobile for more and more of our daily tasks and activities, these new banks may just have their timing right.

    Atom bank intends to build relationships with customers by never being more than one atom away from them, using mobile to enable seamless integration into everyday life. Atom, along with Starling, Fidor and Open bank, all recognise that the new age of customers demand to use services on the go. These customers live on their mobile phones and expect to be able to complete all of their transactions that way. These new players hope that customers will value the fast and convenient features and services, from biometric authentication to digital wallets, above a traditional high street presence.

    This low cost-base proposition allows the mobile banks to lead with low-interest loans and high-interest savings. And the new breed is also tapping into cultural trends, such as social networking and online communities, to appeal further to today’s customers and to help them self-serve. Fidor even links its number of social followers to its interest rates, and is using a community-centric model to help enable it to serve its 300,000 customers with just 32 employees.

    Unify to achieve scale

    Whether the challengers succeed or not, customers will benefit from this period of market disruption, as it is forcing traditional banks to reassess their services and ensure they remain competitive. My view on the future of retail banking is ultimately one of unity. I expect there will be further challenges to the incumbent banks, but there will be two long term survival strategies: stick to a niche market, serve that market well and own the space; or work together with the traditional banks to gain scale. The incumbents will need to innovate faster and faster, but tied down by legacy systems and processes, they cannot do it alone. The challengers offer technological innovation and slick customer experience in spades, but may struggle to gain traction against customer inertia and to navigate the regulatory banking landscape. Joining forces would be mutually beneficial to both the incumbent and the start-up – and ultimately the customer.


     [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/darylwilkinson” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Daryl Wilkinson”] is Strategic Advisor and Managing Director of DWC.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami