Updates from user Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 7:36 pm on August 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , settlement coin   

    The Case Against BankCoin 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAljAAAAJDJhY2Y2YWQyLTI3MzEtNGRjZi04ZmFiLTExZDc2NjEyNzkzNg

    UBS, Deutsche Bank, Santander and BNY Mellon announced their “utility ,” a new digital asset they hope will become the industry standard for settlements. They expect will initially use the coin for post-trade settlement and clearing by early 2018, after they secure blessing from regulators and central banks.

    While this development signals significant market traction for an institutional use of digital assets, I have to say it’s deeply misguided. A bank-issued digital asset can only really efficiently settle between the banks who issued it. Then, two scenarios can play out.

    Scenario one: all banks around the world put aside competitive and geopolitical differences, adopt the same digital asset, agree on its rules, and harmoniously govern its usage. Fat chance.

    Scenario two (the more likely scenario): banks not in the issuing group issue their own digital assets with their own sets of rules and governance.

    We’re kinda seeing this already, as the FT points out, with Citi’s Citicoin and Goldman Sachs’ SETLcoin. The result would be an even more fragmented currency landscape than what we have today. If banks of different digital asset groups want to settle trades with one another, they’ll have to make markets between their unique digital assets or trade between their digital assets and a common fiat currency. What a mess!

    The second big problem with the “utility settlement coin” is it seems it’ll be backed by a basket of currencies. Once backed by cash, it’s no longer an asset; it’s a liability. Trading liabilities then ultimately requires moving cash across borders, re-creating today’s system but adding more friction!

    We strongly believe banks need an independent digital asset to enable truly efficient settlement and we believe XRP is best positioned for that role. It goes back to the fundamentals of what makes digital assets unique and special – they’re universal currencies, meaning anyone can use them as units of value anywhere in the world. That universality gives digital assets global reach and the ability to settle much faster than traditional assets.

    Compared head to head with other independent digital assets (like or ether), XRP settles the most efficiently cross-border, in just seconds. In fact, we’ve run tests with global banks to prove XRP can lower liquidity costs for cross-border trades. More to come on that front.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/bradgarlinghouse” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”President and COO at “]

     
  • user 3:35 pm on August 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , easyJet, Fingerprint, , Flights, ,   

    easyJet Launches Apple Pay Integration: Book & Pay For Flights in CHF With a Digital Fingerprint 

    easyjet apple pay-

    Finally a very smart of Mobile Payment:

    has announced that its customers shall from now on be able to use Apple Pay to pay for their tickets in Switzerland via an iOS App.

    and pay for and extras using just your

    • One of the first European airlines to introduce Pay

    • It’s quick and convenient

    • Secure with Touch ID

     

    Using Apple Pay passengers booking flights through the airline’s app on selected iOS devices (see deatils below) will be able to process their booking in just a matter of seconds thanks to Apple Pay’s secure quick one-touch payment function.

    Phone requirements: easyJet mobile app iOS version 3.7 and above, iOS 9 and above required

    Card types supported: VISA, MasterCard, American Express

    iOS devices supported: iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone SE, iPad Pro, iPad Air 2, iPad mini 4 and iPad mini 3

    Currencies supported: GBP – British Pounds, EUR – Euro, USD – US Dollars, CHF – Swiss Franc

    easyjet apple pay

    This allows passengers to select the card of their choice and authorise a secure payment via fingerprint recognition on their device.

    “We’re delighted that from today we’re one of the first European airlines to introduce Apple Pay. Gone are the days of scrambling around searching for a bank card to book a flight. Checking out on our app is as easy as selecting Apple Pay and placing your finger on Touch ID. Booking flights or adding extras has never been so easy!” &James Millett, easyJet’s Head of

     

    Since the launch of easyJet’s iPhone app in 2011 the app has evolved from easy booking and check-in functionality to include features like passport scanning, live flight tracking, mobile boarding passes and Touch ID. It is also complimented by the easyJet Apple Watch app and real-time airport push notifications for go-to-gate and bag reclaim information.

    The easyJet app is available for download now from the App Store.

     

    Featured Image: Genève Aéroport&;s Twitter

    The post easyJet Launches Apple Pay Integration: Book &038; Pay For Flights in CHF With a Digital Fingerprint appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 12:18 pm on August 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Decades, Dumb, , Serving, ,   

    Why Serving Small Business Is a Smart Move (After Decades of Being a Dumb Move) 

    Image source In 1954, Fortune 500 companies accounted for around 1/3 of GDP in America. By 2000, that share had doubled to 2/3. Hidden in those numbers are the countless family farms that could not withstand the onslaught of Agribusiness and the mom &; pop shops that closed when WalmartRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 11:36 am on August 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , mobile banking   

    Consumers are becoming more willing to pay to use their banks’ mobile apps 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAiTAAAAJDc4MjhjOTVjLWU5MjUtNDBiNy05ZjVmLWNkMjM1MGQ0YTZmZg

    According to BusinessInsider.de Bank app users in the U.S. may become more willing to pay a small monthly subscription fee to use their app. This conclusion is based in a recent study by S&P Global Market Intelligence.

    Though the majority of survey respondents, which included 3,897 US bank app users, said they’re unwilling to pay, 21% of respondents said they’d pay $3 a month, and 40% said they’d be willing to pay $1 a month. The survey results suggest a concerted shift in consumer behavior in regards to subscriptions for .

    The same survey suggests interest in using subscription fees for mobile apps is gaining traction for a number of reasons:

    • Consistent revenue stream: A minute number of app users actually make one-off in-app purchases, according to Sensor Tower. Moreover, app usage is reliant on users remaining engaged. Because of this, developers and app stores alike will benefit from recurring payments from established consumers in lieu of unpredictable one-off purchases.
    • Reduces reliance on in-app ads: This will benefit users that find in-app advertisements annoying. It could also help reduce the strain ads have on mobile data usage, as well as help mitigate battery draining. In-app ads have reached 50% penetration in the top 100 grossing apps, according to Soomla.
    • Developers receive a larger share of in-app revenue: Earlier this year, both Google and Apple announced new payment schemes for app publishers using a subscription model rather than in-app purchases or pay-and-play. Under the new revenue cut, publishers will receive 85% of the revenue from their app, up from 70%.

    An advice to businesses is made to  be careful when considering shifting from a free service to a paid service, lest they risk alienating users. Customers unwilling to pay for an app could easily move to a competitor offering the service for free. One workaround to this problem could be the implementation of a tiered or freemium service, in which users get the basic app for free, and can pay a small subscription to receive a premium service.

    Nevertheless, S&P’s survey shows how implementing a subscription model to an app has the potential to add a sizeable revenue stream to a previously free service. Other apps, such as gaming platforms or virtual assistants, could find similar interest should they investigate a subscription model. 

    The shift toward mobile bank apps is particularly pronounced among millennials, as more of them are moving toward digital banking. And as a result, they’re walking into their ‘ traditional brick-and-mortar branches less often than ever before.

    This generation accounts for the greatest share of the U.S. population at 26% and the employed population at 34%, so it’s easy to see why their behaviors and preferences will have a profound effect on the future of the banking industry, particularly with regard to the way banks interact with their customers.

    Third parties are expanding their role in providing services that consumers use to manage their money. And the more that role grows, the more it will disrupt the relationship between banks and their customers.

    To paint a clearer picture of the future of the banking industry, John Heggestuen, managing research analyst at BI Intelligence, Business Insider’s premium research service, surveyed 1,500 banked millennials (ages 18-34) on their banking behaviors and preferences — from their preferred banking devices, to what banking actions they perform on those devices, to how often they perform them. That rigorous research led to a report entitled The Digital Disruption of Retail Banking that according to Businessinsider.de dives deep into the industry by: An analysis on how millennials use bank branches and why – even though there are a large share of millennials who still use branches, making significant investments in these channels isn’t a good move for banks. Explaining how mobile payments and mobile point-of-sale adoption by small retailers will make the ATM obsolete. Describing how digital channels, particularly the smartphone, will become the foundation of the bank-customer relationship.

    BusinessInsider.de points in the article some take aways from the report: 

    • The bank branch will become obsolete. It will be some time before the final death rattle, but improving online channels, declining branch visits, and the rising cost per transaction at branches are collectively leading to branch closures.
    • Banks that don’t act fast are going to lose relationships with customers. Consumers are increasingly opting for digital banking services provided by third-party tech firms. This is disrupting the relationships between banks and their customers, and banks are losing out on branding and cross-selling opportunities. For many banks, this will require further commoditization of their products and services.
    • The ATM will go the way of the phone booth. Relatively low operational costs compared to bank branches, paired with customers’ preference for in-network ATMs, makes the ATM an attractive substitute for bank tellers. But as cash and check transactions decline, the ATM will become nonessential, ultimately facing the same fate as the physical branch.
    • The smartphone will become the foundational banking channel. As the primary computing device, the smartphone has the potential to know much more about banks’ customers than human advisors do. The smartphone goes everywhere its user goes, has the ability to collect user data, and is already used for making purchases. Therefore, the banks that will endure will be those that offer banking services optimized for the smartphone.

    Images: businessinsider.de / bi intelligence Digital Banking Survey Q3 2015
    Source: businessinsider.de


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/armindom” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Bruno Macedo”] is Corporate Senior Executive Technologist | Researcher, Lecturer and Speaker and this article was originally published on linkedin.

     
  • user 7:35 am on August 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , ,   

    Future of Banks — Platforms or Pipes 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAiFAAAAJDQ3ZTRiODRjLTZiNjctNDJmZS1iZTE4LTc5YTQxZmYxMDRkYQ

    Much has been written about the of . In the end, it all seems to come down to one question: will become platforms or ?

    In reality, there’s no question at all. Platforms are the winning business model of the 21st century and the banking industry is well aware. In fact, banks have been platforms for decades is merely creating the latest set of bank extensions. Earlier incarnations include ATMs and online bill pay for consumers.

    That said, what’s happening today is forcing banks to rethink how fast they extend their platform to avoid becoming just the pipes. The advent of the cloud and the software revolution in Fintech with billions of capital being invested every quarter has brought more innovation to banking in the past two years than it has seen in the past twenty. Still, the current David taking down Goliath narrative surrounding the future of banking and finance ultimately fails to account for the reality of the situation.

    While it often goes unnoticed, a great many fintech startups today rely heavily on banks to enable their innovative services. The success of financial innovations like Apple Pay for instance is happening with a great deal of participation and cooperation between companies and financial institutions.

    This relationship between banks and fintech underscores the reality of the financial services industry’s future. Yes, finance is evolving alongside the accelerating curve of technology, and yes, fintech is driving much of this change, but banks are – and will remain – squarely at the center of the financial universe for quite some time to come.

    For one, banks have been the backbone of the modern economy since its inception. They are far too ingrained in the financial system to be removed within any foreseeable time frame.

    Banks also have deep pockets, infrastructure and experience. Large market caps and long track records are clear signals to customers that banks can weather the inevitable downturn. Startups, on the other hand, are more susceptible to turbulence and market volatility — things banking customers, especially business customers, would rather avoid.

    Big data is yet another boon to banks’ staying power. Banks have been collecting data on customer transactions and behavior for decades. This creates major advantages for banks. When used in the right way, this data can be leveraged to do things like identify customers that are ripe for new payment services or to mitigate and underwrite risk in innovative ways.

    But despite all this, there is one hazard currently menacing banks: disintermediation. Starting with the ATM, technology has been distancing consumers from banks for quite some time. Today, their relationship with the consumer is slimmer than ever.

    Meanwhile, fintech is picking up the slack. While traditional banking experiences can feel clunky, fintech products and services are designed to work with people’s lives and deliver value in new and unexpected ways. These upstarts pride themselves on delivering superior customer experiences — banking that is intuitive, mobile, cloud-based, responsive, available 24/7, you name it.

    Fintech companies are also agile and built for rapid iteration — skill sets banks don’t yet have internally. This allows fintech companies to focus heavily on usability and keeping their user interfaces modern. At Bill.com, for instance, we iterate our onboarding experience every two weeks. By comparison, most banks have outsourced many key functions to third-party service providers like Fiserv and Jack Henry, severely limiting their ability to make product changes outside of rigid, long-term release cycles.

    The comparative lack of innovation by banks is no surprise. For decades, banks have spent most of their resources driving to meet quarterly earnings targets, delivering consistent results and ensuring compliance — the key objectives most highly-regulated, publicly-traded financial institutions must focus on to meet its obligations to shareholders — leaving fewer resources and funds for experimentation, learning and new product development. This makes it difficult for banks to keep up with shifts in customer preferences and behavior the way that fintech can. Banks know this and it is exactly why they are starting to shift their strategies to reflect being a platform and not just the pipes.  

    When banks become platforms for their customers and fintech partners, they increase the value of what they have built over the past several decades and disintermediation on the consumer front becomes irrelevant. Instead, as banks fuse their platforms with fintech, innovation will accelerate creating tremendous value for everyone in the food chain.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/renelacerte” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”René Lacerte”] is CEO/Founder Bill.com and this article was originally published on linkedin.

     

     
  • user 3:35 am on August 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Finovo, , hilft, , Pensionskassen, , vergeben   

    Finovo hilft Pensionskassen Hypotheken zu vergeben 

    finovo ist ein neuer Service Provider für Schweizer . Das Jungunternehmen in Opfikon (Glattpark) wickelt die Direktvergabe von an Versicherte ab. Diese Alternative zu Obligationen-Anlagen ist für Pensionskassen in der aktuellen Tiefzinsphase besonders lukrativ. Allerdings haben viele Respekt vor dem Aufwand, oder das Know-how fehlt.  übernimmt für Pensionskassen den gesamten Prozess der Hypothekenvergabe.

    «Anlagenotstand: Pensionskassen setzen zunehmend auf Vergabe von Hypotheken»: So überschrieb
    die Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften 2015 ihre Mitteilung über eine Studie der
    ZHAW School of Management and Law. Das aktuelle Tiefzinsumfeld, die zunehmenden regulatorischen
    Anforderungen und die gesetzlich vorgeschriebene Mindestverzinsung würden einen hohen
    Renditedruck für die Vorsorgeeinrichtungen bedeuten, so die Studienautoren.

    Pensionskassen müssen also neue Investitionsmöglichkeiten finden, um ihren Verpflichtungen nachzukommen. Hypotheken sind eine hervorragende Alternative etwa zu Obligationen: Sie versprechen eine bessere Rendite. Sie sind grundpfandgedeckt und damit relativ risikoarm. Und sie bleiben bei einem Zinsanstieg wertstabil, weil sie zum Nennwert bilanziert werden. Einige Pensionskassen nutzen diese Möglichkeit bereits heute.

    finovo-

    finovo, ein neues Dienstleistungsunternehmen in Opfikon, positioniert sich deshalb mit einer ganzheitlichen Hypothekenlösung für Pensionskassen.

    Christian Stöckli

    Christian Stöckli, Mitgründer von finovo

     

    «Wir sind die einzigen Anbieter im Markt, die den gesamten Prozess von der Vermarktung über die Abwicklung bis zur Risikobewirtschaftung von Hypotheken managen», sagt Christian Stöckli, Mitgründer von finovo.

     

     

    Sämtliche operativen Schritte werden von der Pensionskasse ausgelagert, und die einzelnen Hypothekarnehmer werden von finovo direkt und persönlich betreut.

    Die Resonanz bei den Pensionskassen ist gross. Das freut den finovo-Verwaltungsratspräsidenten
    und ehemaligen CEO von Swisscanto Dr. Gérard Fischer: «Viele potenzielle Kunden haben gemerkt,
    dass es bei der direkten Hypothekenvergabe nur Gewinner gibt: Die Pensionskasse erwirtschaftet
    eine höhere Rendite, und die Hypothekarnehmer profitieren von günstigen Zinssätzen sowie – als
    Versicherte – von einer besseren Verzinsung ihrer Altersguthaben

    Die Finovo AG wurde von den Finanzierungsspezialisten Christian Stöckli und Roger Plüss gegründet, beides langjährige Direktionsmitglieder im Bankwesen. Zum finovo-Team gehören neben ihnen und Verwaltungsratspräsident Dr. Gérard Fischer (mit langjähriger Erfahrung im Vorsorge- und Anlagegeschäft) auch Matthias Zimmermann (Verwaltungsrat, Mitgründer von jobs.ch) und Martin Diethelm (Chief Officer). Weitere Informationen zu den involvierten Personen und Fotos auf Anfrage.

    The post Finovo hilft Pensionskassen Hypotheken zu vergeben appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 12:40 am on August 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Moscow, ,   

    Moscow Government to Explore Blockchain Voting 

    officials in today revealed plans to investigate applications of .
    CoinDesk

     
  • user 12:18 am on August 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    Marcus Will Succeed Despite — Or Because of — Goldman Sachs 

    As reported last week,   just announced the creation of a new retail lending arm to launch in October, named after one of its founders. No one is really all that concerned about whether or not Marcus will be able to do its job— it&;s Goldman Sachs after all, and has access to soRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 9:40 pm on August 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'Liberalize', , , , , Creators, ,   

    Settlement Coin Creators Seek to ‘Liberalize’ Central Banks With Blockchain 

    A new digital currency built for is designed to make it easier for more people to use two powerful tools: real-time settling and cash.
    CoinDesk

     
  • user 9:35 pm on August 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Is Brexit Good Or Bad News For UK Fintech? 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAd0AAAAJDVjZjcwZGRhLWZhZGUtNGZhZS04MmFiLTQ2N2Q4MDQ5ZjhhYg

    I found a relaxing holiday away from Europe a great opportunity to think about the impact of the UK leaving the EU on the industry I’ve dedicated most of my career to. As a European based in London, the events leading to have left me amused and irritated in equal measure. As long-term practitioner in , I am mostly worried about understanding their impact on my industry.

    I s Bre xit good or bad news for UK FinTech?

    Historically the emergence of London as a global financial services (and more recently FinTech) hub as been due to four fundamental factors:

    • Access: Easy access to a market the size of a continent with a shared set of rules and regulations
    • Regulation: Engagement with forward-thinking regulators that could cover both the UK and the EU
    • Talent: The availability of skilled, flexible and motivated people
    • Capital: The availability of money — be it angel, venture, PE or corporate — to back new ideas

    The two main tenets of the Brexit “movement”: 1) the decoupling of UK regulation from Brussels rules and 2) a stop to the free movement of people within the EU will both affect the state of Fintech in the UK.

    Access

    London is arguably the premier global financial centre. In a hugely globalised world, financial centres operate as primary access points to very large markets regulated by similar legal frameworks. New York is the access point to the US economy with 319m people with a $16.2T GDP, Hong Kong provides access to Chinese market of 1.4B people with a $8.5T GDP while London before the split was the access point to the EU with 508m people with a $17.2T GDP.

    Access to the rest of the EU is based on the acceptance of shared rules, policies and regulations, a process called “Passporting”. Should the UK wish to pursue a separate regulatory regime, EU Passporting in its current form will cease. Making London the access point to a market of 64m people with a $2.8T GDP — still sizeable but not nearly as large as what it is today.

     

    In the meantime, the EU will undoubtedly continue on its cross-Europe harmonising drive, supperted by initiatives like the Single Digital Market programme, making it even more desirable for start-ups, FinTech and otherwise, to be located in an EU country. Both Paris and Berlin have already started positioning themselves as an ideal alternative to London.

    Brexit will make access to the EU market more complex.

    Talent

    Post Brexit, businesses planning to serve EU countries will probably no longer see London as the natural choice for their first foray into Europe. English, a strong legal system and a good quality of life for expats may no longer be enough to make London the natural choice if access to rest of the continent is curtailed. Large corporates will begin to consider Dublin, Paris, Barcelona and Berlin more readily than before, depriving the UK from the talent pool that global players develop in the markets they settle in.

    The European “Right to Move” has enabled foreign firms based in the UK to easily hire talented individuals from a pool of over 500m people. As these people got hired, they improved the quality of the already outstanding UK workforce, creating more interesting jobs that in turn attract more talented people. This process has become a virtuous circle making London one of the most dynamic workplaces in the world. Large global finance, consulting and tech firms have contributed and benefitted from this talent pool. A quick look at the backgrounds of founders and key people in UK FinTech start-ups reveals that a large number of them began their careers at large firms Goldman, City, McKinsey, PayPal and Google.

    The current regulatory complexity and costs of hiring non-EU talent would be extended to EU citizens. No matter how streamlined this process will become it will have an impact on the talent pool. This will be an issue as qualified domestic talent will not be enough to satisfy demand — at least in the short term. Parliament forecasts that between 2013 and 2017 the UK will need to find 745,000 workers with digital skills.

    All in all Brexit will make finding talent harder.

    Regulation

    One of the reasons the digital revolution has hit financial services so late is the weight of regulation. The UK regulators are unusually progressive and keen supporters of innovation. The recent introduction of Project Innovate with its Innovation Hub and the Regulatory Sandbox by the Financial Conduct Authority is a great example of this mind-set. Firms based in the UK benefit from being regulated by a forward-thinking regulator with oversight that stretches across the EU.

    Without regulatory “Passporting”, a UK FinTech firm with EU ambitions, would have to open subsidiaries or relocate to an EU country. These additional costs and complexity will inevitably lead to slower growth, need for more capital and eventually difficulty in attracting investment at the valuations of the pre-Brexit days.

    Brexit will make it harder for UK based firms to serve Europe.

    Investors

    In 2015 the UK was the clear EU leader in FinTech investment. In the period between 2010 and 2015 the UK Fintech firms received $5.4B investment with the rest of Europe accounting for only $4.4B. London is a leading location for entrepreneurs seeking venture funding. Brexit could impact this in several ways:

    Firstly, dealing with multiple regulators will lead to reduced valuations. Business will have the to choose to either be regulated both in the UK and in the EU — with more costs or focus on the UK only with reduced revenues — either way their costs will increase.

    Secondly, if business will have to deal with a tighter talent pool they will either grow slower or have to pay more for staff. Again valuations will be impacted.

    Lastly, if Brexit results in less financial services firms being based in the UK, access to capital will inevitably be impacted, especially for early stage and Angel investors. All said, as some start-ups will relocate to Europe those that remain in the UK may find less competition.

    Brexit will make it harder for start-ups to find investors and to achieve the valuations they could expect in the past.

    What Brexit will eventually look like is not yet clear. Politicians are aiming to negotiate a deal for the UK that will retain all or most of the benefits associated with EU membership, while giving up many of the responsibilities.The extent of their success in achieving this will determine the effect of Brexit on the UK FinTech industry.

    All things considered it would seem unlikely that the role of London as Europe’s financial and tech hub will not be diminished. Especially as several other cities are already positioning themselves to take on the role.

    At this stage all we can do is cross our fingers and hope for the best.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/aehatami” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Alessandro Hatami”] is Founder at The Pacemakers and this article was originally published on linkedin.

     

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami