Updates from user Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 7:37 pm on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Open Innovation,   

    Open Innovation, hyperledger & blockchain 

    aaeaaqaaaaaaaaeiaaaajgu0ogmxnjmwlwiwzmutngnlys05njqzltblmtdjodhlyta0ng

    In this blog post, I will outline these three terms and explain the amazing transformational opportunity that arises from their coalescence.


     is a term originally coined by Dr Henry Chesbrough in the early 2000’s best summarised by Figure 1 below.

    Figure 1 – Open Innovation

    Open Innovation gives organisations the ability to create value by combining their ideas and innovation with those from their business network members.


    To understand , it’s useful to step back to realize that Business – and Governments – never operate in isolation. They are participants in a business network. Ownership of assets pass across the network in return for payments, governed by contracts. Network participants currently keep their own ledger – recording all assets they own and updated on when asset ownership changes. Whilst well tried & tested, this process is very inefficient, often piling cost on cost.

    Figure 2 – Components of Blockchain for Business

    Blockchain provides the business network with the ability to agree that a transaction is valid; an audit trail of asset ownership over time; a shared ledger ( “record book”) that is tamper proof, and guaranteed finality of transactions. Government oversight, compliance & audit can be part of the same network.


    Hyperledger is a Linux Foundation project to render a blockchain fabric (or plumbing) for business. It’s stated goals are a “collaborative effort created to advance blockchain by identifying and addressing important features for a cross-industry open standard for distributed ledgers that can transform the way business transactions are conducted globally”.

    For me, the important attributes of are:

    1. Open Governance – direction and oversight comes from a wide cross industry base, ensuring the widest applicability of the blockchain fabric for business usage.
    2. Open Standards – hyperledger blockchain solutions will interoperate with other blockchain solutions through open, published interfaces and services.
    3. Open Source – hyperledger source code can be inspected and validated by the broadest community of interest maximising quality and fitness for purpose.

    So what happens when we bring Open Innovation, blockchain and hyperledgertogether?

    First we need to realise that the business network as the first “acid test” for a blockchain use case – no business network means “think again about blockchain usage”.

    Our customers have different approaches to building out the networks to drive full value from blockchain, and we often get to advise and guide them in the pragmatic, practical steps of network formation. This comes down to how much our customer wants to embrace Open Innovation – that is how much they want to create value by combining their ideas with those from other business network members. This can be visualised by setting the slider in Figure 3.

    Figure 3 – Open / Closed Innovation Slider

    Full Open Innovation is not right for all use cases, not organisationally easy, and won’t be possible when strong competitive forces exist in the network.  But I would argue that the most transformational value can be realised when Open Innovation, blockchain and hyperledger can be brought together.


    More blockchain Information?

    1. Blockchain for Government
    2. Proving Provenance with Blockchain
    3. Blockchain and Cyber Security
    4. Blockchain, how SMART is your contract?
    5. Blockchain privacy services

    Originally published in Insights on Business, October 2016

    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-innovation-hyperledger-blockchain-john-palfreyman?trk=hp-feed-article-title-like” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”John Palfreyman”] is Director – Blockchain at IBM Cloud Division

     
  • user 3:36 pm on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Abkehr, Finanzdirektion, , StartupSteuerpraxis, umstrittener,   

    Abkehr der Zürcher Finanzdirektion von umstrittener Startup-Steuerpraxis 

    Swiss Startup Association, Swiss Finance Startups, Venturelab, Business Angels Schweiz und glp nehmen zufrieden zur Kenntnis, dass die von ihrer umstrittenen Steuerpraxis bezüglich Startups wieder abkehrt und zur ursprünglichen, fairen Bewertung von Jungunternehmen zurückfindet.

    Gemeinsam hatten sie sich die Intereessensgruppe im laufenden Jahr an vorderster Front für eine adäquate Bewertung und daraus folgenden gerechte Besteuerung von Gründer und Business Angels eingesetzt.

    Swiss Startup Association

     

    Im Mai 2016 hatte die Finanzdirektion des Kantons Zürich an ihrer Medienkonferenz mitgeteilt, an ihrer neuen Steuerpraxis von Startups festhalten zu wollen. Diese Praxis sah eine Vermögenssteuer von Startup Unternehmern aufgrund von Finanzierungsrunden vor, was die Existenz vieler Gründer ernsthaft gefährdete. Gleichzeitig versprach Regierungsrat Ernst Stocker, dass Startups in Zürich nicht schlechter gestellt sein sollen als in anderen Kantonen.

    venturelab.ch

    VentureLab

     

    Mit geeinten Kräften hatten Swiss Startup Association (SSA), Swiss Finance Startups (SFS), Venturelab, Business Angels Schweiz (BAS) und glp daraufhin einen breit abgestützten Aufruf, unterzeichnet von über 80 CEOs, Gründern und Investoren, an Regierungsrat Stocker übergeben und gleichzeitig eine Motion im Kantonsrat für die Aufhebung der unfairen Steuerpraxis eingereicht.

    Die Einführung von Vermögenssteuern aufgrund von Finanzierungsrunden ist für Startups nicht tragbar, da sie einen fiktiven Vermögenswert besteuert, der gar nicht realisiert wurde. Sie stellt somit eine Diskriminierung von Jungunternehmen gegenüber KMUs dar, die ihrerseits aufgrund ihres Ertrags- resp. Substanzwert besteuert werden („Praktikermethode“).

    Swiss Finance Startups

    Swiss Finance Startups

    Aufgrund von parlamentarischen Anfragen und Interpellationen an diverse Kantonsregierungen stellte sich im Laufe des Sommers heraus, dass der Kanton Zürich mit dieser Besteuerungsgrundlage weitgehend alleine da steht und andere Kantone keinen Anlass sehen, sich dieser Praxis anzuschliessen.

    Dass sich die Finanzdirektion nun bereit erklärt, von ihrer Steuerpraxis abzusehen und zur Praktikermethode zurückzukehren, ist ein regelrechter Befreiungsschlag für Startups und das ganze Ökosystem. Die Entscheidung schafft Rechtssicherheit für die Zukunft und macht den Standort Zürich für Gründer, Investoren und Mitarbeitende von Startups wieder attraktiv.

    Besonders begrüsst SFS, dass der Entscheid mehrere Wochen vor der Jahreswende getroffen fällt, was vielen Startups die Abwanderung in andere Kantone oder ins Ausland ersparen dürfte.

    Die Interessensgruppe sieht diesem Entscheid die Grundlage für eine konstruktive Zusammenarbeit mit der Finanzdirektion und das Commitment des Regierungsrats zum Zürcher Innovationsstandort und zum Startup Ökosystem.

    The post Abkehr der Zürcher Finanzdirektion von umstrittener Startup-Steuerpraxis appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 12:18 pm on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: aggregators, , , , , , , , rhythm,   

    Stock exchanges are aggregators of market data feeds, not playing to the Fintech rhythm 

    A check on before Halloween makes sense. We covered stock exchanges in a two part series in May, with a focus more on innovation and naturally, we found parties and concerts all over the planet. These activities continue to spread but today I want to highlightRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 12:18 am on November 1, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Context360, , , Hixme, MPower,   

    Top 3 Fintech Raises: Context360, Hixme, MPower Financing 

    There’s no shortage of interest in right now &; the recent 10,000-plus attendees at last week’s Money20/20 conference proved that &8212; and even though the industry is still not seeing the mega funding rounds it did last year, investors are still finding new fintechs to sink their teeth into. It appears asRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 12:19 pm on October 31, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , ,   

    Data Keeps Customers Safer, But Access to It Has Become a Battle 

    In the Age of Information, companies that have made their business are getting more competitive as they seek to tame the mountains of available data into useful, actionable insights and answers. The have the data. startups want it, and argue it is better for , but of course,Read More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 12:18 am on October 31, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , NanoPay, , , ,   

    Payments Platform NanoPay Raises $10M, Led by Goldman Sachs 

    Toronto-based   announced yesterday that it has raised $ 10 million in a Series A round in order to expand its business and offerings, most notably its open API platform, MintChip. MintChip was developed by the Royal Canadian Mint in 2012 and shuttered in 2014. In January 2016, the project wasRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 12:18 pm on October 30, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Coins, Colored   

    IPO or ICO or IEO (briefing on Colored Coins) 

    Image source The new kid on the block is IEO (Initial Equity Offering). I coined that phrase because neither IPO or ICO fits. – IPO (Initial Public Offering) implies listing shares on a regulated Stock Market such as NYSE, Nasdaq, LSE, SIX etc.  – ICO (Initial Currency Offering) implies issuingRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 12:18 am on October 30, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , Studies   

    Not Even Millennials Care About Mobile Payments, Studies Show 

    Turns out millennials don&;t that much . According to a report presented by the tech consultancy Accenture at Money20/20, the number of those of us in North America who use our mobile phones to pay at the point of sale hasn’t changed in the slightest since last year,Read More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 12:19 pm on October 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , BlackLine, , , ,   

    BlackLine Gains Nearly 50% in Largest Tech IPO of 2016 

    Inc. priced its IPO at the high end of the range on Friday, and surged 50% in a delayed opening, squarely placing the accounting and software company in unicorn territory. Could this signal the beginning of something good for ? Los Angeles-based BlackLine priced 8.6 million shares at $ 17Read More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 3:35 am on October 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Investigates, Mutual, , Sigma, ,   

    A Comeback For Mutual Insurance? Swiss Re Report Investigates Six Sigma and Digital Technology 

    The sector has undergone a modest recovery in recent years, says Re&;s latest   &;Mutual insurance in the 21st century: back to the future?&; Mutual insurers&8217; share of the overall insurance market increased from 24% of direct premiums written in 2007 to just over 26% in 2014, reversing some of the declines of previous decades. However, the segment faces challenges, including adapting to new risk-based capital requirements and more stringent corporate governance arrangements, which could put some mutuals at a competitive disadvantage.

    sigmaFurther, mutual insurers must embrace technological disruption. Exploiting such as smart analytics and social media should allow mutuals to better serve the interests of their member-owners, while their ownership structure should enable mutuals to keep insurance affordable for some individuals and risks.

    The primary purpose of mutual insurers is to provide risk protection coverage for its owner-members, rather than to make profits or provide returns to external shareholders as in the case for stock-based insurers. Over the past few years, cumulative premiums written by mutual insurers have outpaced those of the wider insurance market, with much of the outperformance concentrated during the height of the financial crisis in 2008-09.

     

    &8220;That mutuals&8217; relative premium performance did not reverse once economic growth resumed after the financial crisis, suggests a degree of permanence to the segment&8217;s recovery,&8221; says Kurt Karl, Chief Economist at Swiss Re. &8220;Some mutual groups have expanded internationally in recent years, and new mutuals have been established in a number of markets, another indication of the segment&8217;s renewed popularity.&8221;

    However, while mutuals&8217; share of the global insurance market has increased modestly since 2007, it remains well below previous highs. For example, in the life sector, the share of global premiums of life mutuals was 23% in 2014, well below levels of around 66% in the late 1980s and early 1990s before a wave of demutualisations in a number of countries.

    sigma4_2016_fig2

     

    New challenges
    Mutual insurers face a number of challenges. The most obvious comes from new risk-based capital requirements and tougher corporate governance arrangements introduced by governments and regulators, designed to boost the resilience of individual insurers and curb excessive risk taking. These requirements could put some mutuals, especially smaller ones with a narrow regional or business line focus, at a competitive disadvantage. Larger and better-diversified insurers are in a stronger position to manage the additional operational and funding costs associated with compliance.

    Regulators appear alert to the possible unintended consequences of their new rules, and emphasise proportionality in implementing the new prudential (i.e. capital) and governance regimes. There has also been a renewed focus on the range of capital solutions available to mutuals, including legislation in some countries to allow equity-like capital instruments to be issued, such as certificats mutualistes in France. Together with customised reinsurance solutions and alternative risk transfer mechanisms such as insurance-linked securities, this will give mutuals increased financial flexibility to grow their business and compete with other types of insurers.

     

    Embracing digital technology
    Digital technology is changing the way that insurance is designed, priced and sold, and is fundamentally re-configuring the competitive landscape in which all insurers operate. Mutual insurers must adapt and upgrade their underwriting and distribution practices if they are to remain relevant in the digital age. There are signs that many are actively embracing such change, but some mutual insurers are lagging behind.

    sigma4_2016_fig1

    For example, smaller mutual insurers have not yet adopted full online functionality in their business practices, perhaps reflecting their greater attachment to traditional agent/broker distribution. The laggards run the risk of losing out to market participants better placed to harness the new technologies. This is especially true given the growing development of peer-to-peer (P2P) insurance platforms, which enable individuals to share risks among themselves in much the same way that affinity-based mutual insurers do.

    The post A Comeback For Mutual Insurance? Swiss Re Report Investigates Six Sigma and Digital Technology appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami