Tagged: technology Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 7:35 am on June 6, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: axzz4ALNEamMS, , , , , technology   

    The Road Ahead: 3 Big Insurance Trends for the Next 12 Months 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAdEAAAAJDE1YTcwNGMwLWQwNDQtNDk4OS04YWY3LTZhZDAxZTlkOGI0Zg

    and prognostication must be traits buried right in the genetic core of the human species. People’s desire to peer around the corner into what they can’t see and try to make sense of the shapes and shadows is almost a basic need.  It makes us feel smart, it provides comfort as a source of clarity, it lets us show off our expertise.

    So, while I may be motivated by some weird base instinct to call the industry’s shots- I also genuinely think the next year will turn out to be unlike any the industry has ever seen. At the least, we’re beginning to see some tectonic shifts in how insurance does business as it starts succumbing to the inexorable forces of , customer demand, and most importantly, as it finally gives in to good old fashion evolution.

    Here are the three big trends in insurance that I see taking shape over the next twelve months.

    1.  Venture capital firms will start to pick leaders

    There’s strong demand for insurance technology investments in the VC community right now. According to CB Insights, there was $2.65 billion in VC investments in insurtech companies in 2015, about three-and-a-half times the amount invested in similar companies the prior year. This makes sense too. Insurance is one of the remaining industries that hasn’t yet taken a huge, technology-based step forward and VCs are finally realizing the potential impact technology could have on how it’s bought, sold and administered.

    So, while there has been a massive demand for insurance investments from the VC community, beyond employee benefits, the actual pace of investment has been relatively low due to an almost complete lack of investment opportunities with attractive business models, proven teams, and productive uses for their capital.  Even including benefits, while $2.65 billion is a lot of money, it’s a small percentage of the $128.5 billion in VC money that was raised last year.

    Over the course of the next year, we’ll see a few strong financial models emerge from companies who took seed rounds over the last 18 months that will attract sizable Series A rounds to fund growth and establish leads in their market segments.  The noise and buzz around insurtech has already spawned a growing number of me-too copycats and business model clones but, as has happened with other formerly hot sectors for venture capital- the on-demand economy and marketplace lending- the benefits of scale and access to capital will accrue almost entirely to the innovative first movers. 

    2.  Carriers will start more meaningful partnerships with startups to drive innovation

    You can bet that all carriers are already having discussions about this in their boardrooms right now, it’s reflected in strategic VC investments even if not yet in meaningful operating partnerships, but over the next year we’ll see which carriers will actually pull the trigger on deals – be it acquisitions or partnerships – that lean on startups to help them jumpstart the pace of innovation inside the company.  We’ve started to see meaningful partnerships with technology companies from the large only recently, but there is reason to think that insurers will move faster.

    Most of this activity will happen around finding new means of distribution, new ways to help claims adjusting, big data analysis for underwriting, and early efforts at incorporating the Internet of Things. It will be a fairly incredible thing to see for a couple reasons: first, it will be impressive to see massive companies realize that they can no longer “move at the speed of insurance,” and, second forward-thinking carriers who welcome technology to the fold will create sizeable business advantages against their more luddite rivals, and do so more quickly than ever before possible.

    3.  Migration of talent from old guard companies to insurtech startups

    As insurtech companies raise larger amounts of capital, more and more executives from established insurance companies will start to join their ranks. Lemonade’s hires from AIG and ACE and Embroker’s own recent addition of Tom DeMichael from Willis will be the first wave of a larger trend as property and casualty focused startups will by their nature require more industry expertise than the first wave of employee benefits startups like Zenefits.

    As funding increases for insurtech leaders (see prediction No. 1), on-hand cash at these startups will allow them to lure top talent away from the industry giants, just as the massive carriers and brokers alike will be adjusting to the brave, new world of insurance by trying to cut bloated cost structures. Seasoned execs that are dynamic enough to thrive in the fast-moving startup environment will be in short supply, creating great opportunities for the available free agents and new entrants alike.

    Each of these are trends that will be at play not only over the next 12 months, but for several years at least to come.  However, I expect now is when we’ll start to see real movement on each.  One thing is clear: the insurance industry – as well as the burgeoning insurtech market – will be an incredibly interesting space to watch.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/millermatthewc” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Matt Miller”] is founder & CEO of Embroker and a version of this post first appeared in the Embroker Blog

     
  • user 2:10 am on June 6, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , technology   

    Fintech is playing the long game 

    chess Our team has been actively investing in for the past two years. In addition to reading pitches from hundreds of companies and meeting with dozens, half of our team has worked in the finance sector in previous careers. SparkLabs Global decided to create an easy to read overview for others to get up to speed on how innovation and will disrupt the financial sector. Read More


    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 10:54 pm on June 5, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , engage, , , , , , technology   

    How Fintech Startups should engage Finserv Incumbents 

     

    shutterstock_327573749If my thesis on the growing importance of Corporate Venture Capital, b2b business models and (banking or insurance)  as strategic partners for  &; in lending, capital markets, payments, asset management and insurance &8211; then it is of the utmost importance for said startups to know how to with their future investors/customers/partners. To be clear, for the purposes of this exercise I will assume there is a business/ rationale and intent to partner.

    The most optimal way to know how to engage with someone is to learn how they engage with you.

    A finserv Incumbent will engage you along three vectors: a) the venture investing vector, b) the innovation vector, and c) the business vector.

    Answering questions around what, how, who and where along these three vectors is paramount to your future success. Answers to many of the questions I am mapping out below will help you gauge not only the mechanics of engagement but the culture of the strategic partner you are dealing with and if that culture fits with your vision.

    Your goal is to figure out how difficult the road ahead is and what to do to maximize success. Remember that dealing with a finserv Incumbent is eminently more difficult that dealing with an independent venture investor.

    As a rule of thumb the more abstracted, specialized and sophisticated each of these vectors are, the easier it will be to achieve your goals, assuming business alignment and intent are present. Picture a finserv Incumbent where there is no venture or innovation team per se and where all decision will be made on balance sheet by business leaders with little understanding of early stage technology or business models and you will readily understand that your path will be rather arduous.

    Here are a few pointers I recommend fintech entrepreneurs pay heed to when interacting with a bank or an insurance company. Answering these questions will lead you to better understand what beast you are dealing with.

    1) How does an Incumbent invest in startups: Does the group you are dealing with have a dedicated team specialized in venture investing or a generalist team that takes care of any type of investment? Is the venture team investing on balance sheet or are they organized as a separate entity? How much capital is dedicated to venture investing? Who sits on the Investment Committee, only the venture team, only executives, a mix? What can they invest in and what cannot they invest in? What makes them consider making an investment? Can they invest without a commercial or strategic rationale?

    2) How mature is an Incumbent&;s venture investing practice: How many investments have they made? What is their due diligence and investment process? How long does it take? How deep is the due diligence process? How much capital is left to make investments in the next 3 years? What is their reputation? Are they specialized enough to know venture investing is as much of an art as it is a science, if not more?

    3) How does an Incumbent approach innovation: Do they have an innovation group? Is it centralized or decentralized &8211; especially important if you are dealing with a global incumbent? In case there is a central innovation group and decentralized teams, who is the decision maker when considering innovation projects? Is the innovation group divided into specialized teams?

    4) How mature is an Incumbent&8217;s innovation group: How long has the group been in existence? How many projects has the group worked on? How many projects can the group work on simultaneously? Does the group work on projects with early stage startups as well as established service providers? How savvy are they with your technology? What is their reputation in the marketplace? Are they leaders, &;me too&; players?

    5) What is the role of the business group involved: Do they have decision making powers when contemplating an investment, when contemplating a commercial agreement? When do they get involved &8211; early in the process, late? Can they contemplate a commercial agreement without making an investment?

    6) How mature are the Incumbent&8217;s business groups when dealing with startups: How many startups have they dealt with? How many commercial agreements have they completed? Where they front line or did they rely on Venture and Innovation? What is their reputation? What is the average time for them to go to market with new projects? How is their incentive, top line or cost wise, with your particular business? Are they urgently in need of your business solution?

    7) Interaction between Venture, Innovation and the Business groups: Who leads, who follows, who reports to whom? Is the interest in interacting with your startup initiated by Innovation, by Venture, by the Business group and what are the implications? How will Venture or Innovation help you navigating potential commercial agreements with Business groups? Who has &8220;skin in the game&8221; compared to the others? Who has more &8220;skin in the game&8221; than others?

    8) How is the decision making process influenced: Who are the decision makers, the gatekeepers and the champions? Where do they sit in the org chart and among the Venture, Innovation and Business groups.

    9) Motivations of each of Venture, Innovation and Business groups: Are the motivations aligned? What are the goals? Pay special attention to how aligned the Business group is with Venture and Innovation. Do commercial imperatives trump innovation imperatives? Do long term strategic imperatives trump short term commercial ones? How do these motivations and imperatives apply to you and your startup?

    10) Reporting Structure: Who do Venture and Innovation report to? Directly to the CEO, the CFO, the Board? If not who do they report to? Does Venture report to Innovation? Are both Venture and Innovation hidden within the bowels of an Incumbent or do they have the necessary and required exposure and support from C-level executives?

    11) Explore the role of legal, compliance and regulatory: How convoluted will be the legal and compliance process? Will you be dealing directly with legal and compliance or will you be shielded by Venture, Innovation of the Business group? When will legal and compliance be involved? Are they well versed in the legal arts of early stage investing? Will they bring a bazooka to a knife fight? How much of a burden will they impose on you? Will there be a regulatory approval hurdle to clear?

    12) Explore the role of procurement: Assuming there is a vendor management or procurement group, will you need to clear that hurdle too? What will it mean to you, how many resources will you have to engage immediately and over time? What type of data will you need to provide? Are they gatekeepers or decision makers too?

    13) Explore who will be in charge of a commercial project implementation and integration: Will the Business group be responsible? Will they have the skills and understanding required to fully digest your technology and business model? Will they rely on a separate IT or operations group? If so, how does the IT/Ops group interact with new vendors when implementing and integrating? How mature and sophisticated is the IT/Ops team? Have they engaged startups in the past or are they more of a &8220;we build our own stuff&8221; outfit?

    14) Explore how your future finserv Incumbent partner interacts with the broad ecosystem: Are they aligned with independent hackathons, independent accelerators? Who are their natural peer partners &8211; other or insurers they have invested with in the future or entered in JV or commercial agreements with? Who are their natural competitors &8211; those they will not want to deal with or invest with or JV with? Which traditional VC investors have they invested with in the past? Which non-bank companies do they partner with? Does partnering accelerate your chances of additional partnerships?

    15) Gauge how you will need to adapt: Inevitably, you will need to adapt based on answers and observations you glean along the way. I do not mean adapting in fundamental ways such as radically changing your business model or your technology, and if that is a requirement then you think twice about the costs and benefits before engaging fully. Rather I mean marginal adaptation to clear certain understandable hurdles around technology delivery for example. How much professional services will you need to incorporate? Will you need to localize to a certain geography? Will your partner&8217;s compliance thresholds lead you to tweak your technology? The sooner you get clarity on the need to adapt and how you will need to adapt, the sooner you will be able to quantify and qualify the associated costs.

    16) Explore post integration life as a startup partner: Are the rules of engagement well defined? Will there be periodic reviews? How will you be reviewed? Will the relationship be balanced? Who will participate? Will the champions, gatekeepers and decision makers that you identified during the pre commercial phase be the same?

    I realize I have mapped many questions. My purpose is not to scare a fintech entrepreneur. Do realize the end goal is a potential prize of investment, referenceable client, commercial agreement and cash flow generation. In other words, the rewards are overwhelmingly worth the pain of discovery and engagement strategy building.

    Additionally, even if there is a demonstrable strategic/commercial rationale, answer to the above may lead you to realize you are not ready for that particular finserv Incumbent as a partner, or that they are not ready for you. That type of epiphany may save you form serious heartburns down the road.

    More specifically, dealing with a finserv Incumbent is unique from the point of view of regulatory, compliance and legal complexities as well as the type of individuals you will encounter (business leaders may not know how to engage with a startup, IT/Ops may not be up to par knowledge wise). Knowledge will allow you to mitigate more effectively.

    Finally, remember that the mature service providers and vendors that sell to banks or insurers are very sophisticated and know how to sell, to whom to sell, how complex it is to sell. As a fintech entrepreneur you are competing with these mature service providers with limited resources. You need the smarts and the framework to close that gap and become a sophisticated &8220;enterprise&8221; focused fintech startup in your own right.

    FiniCulture

     
  • user 10:40 pm on June 4, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , technology   

    Making Sense of Blockchain Smart Contracts – CoinDesk 

    The idea has long been hyped to the public as a central component of next-generation platforms, and as a key capability for any practical enterprise application.

    The different definitions usually fall into one of two categories. Sometimes the term is used to identify a specific – code that is stored, verified and executed on a blockchain. Let’s call this type of definition “smart contract code”.

    Using the same term to refer to distinct concepts makes answering even simple questions impossible. For instance, one question I’m often asked is simply: what are the capabilities of a smart contract?

    , then the answer depends on the capabilities of the language used to express the contract and the technical features of the blockchain on which it operates.

    a binding legal agreement, the answer depends on far more than the technology. This answer depends on existing legal doctrine and how our legal, political and commercial institutions decide to treat the technology. If businesspeople don’t trust it, the legislature doesn’t recognize it and the courts can’t interpret it, then it won’t be a very practically useful “contract”.

     

     

     
  • user 5:20 pm on June 3, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , technology,   

    Why This Ethereum Co-Founder Isn’t Launching a DAO 

    co-founder Anthony Di Iorio helped create the that underlies DAOs, but he doesn’t want to launch one himself.
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 3:35 pm on June 3, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Luxury, Middlemen, technology   

    Blockchain to Help Eliminate the Middlemen in the Luxury Industry 

    ’s increasing popularity is now being embraced by a wide range of industries. Start-ups are being created by people across the world who have a desire to use blockchain’s revolutionary ledger to improve their specialist , and to further support causes they are passionate about.

    Today this is rarely being witnessed more clearly than in the art world, where blockchain is set to have a seismic impact. start-ups are discovering just how blockchain’s cryptographically secure network can be used to verify the ownership of art and its capability in reducing the number of forgeries and licensing disputes.

     

    Breaking up the closed deals market

    At present, are routinely used to close deals between buyers and sellers of art, with the middleman’s role being to ensure trust and market liquidity. As with many systems currently in use around the world, therefore, these middlemen are effectively the centralized entities.

    With an increasing amount of art being traded online, however, the demand for authenticity certificates has increased, which a middleman can’t always produce, or be relied upon by either party to always be operating honestly and independently. The decentralized basis upon which blockchain operates removes the need for this middleman; instead, a worldwide ledger that securely stores records of certificates and previous verifications will allow artists, art collectors and even insurers to be able to perform instant authenticity verifications.

     

    Art Market

    Indeed, verifying authenticity is a critical function of the art industry. When purchasing art, buyers want to be fully secure in the knowledge that the artwork is genuine, especially as the art world is currently riddled with forgeries. Buyers are not able to fully ascertain, for example, whether multiple pieces of a supposedly unique artwork have been created. According to German artist Stephan Vogler, blockchain could solve this authenticity problem.

    The decentralised ledger can use metadata – a ‘hash’ value – which can allow others to uniquely identify data, and in doing so, provide them with a guarantee that the artwork has been licensed and its integrity has not been compromised. Transactions cannot proceed without consensus among blockchain’s network participants. Under blockchain, therefore, the license can’t tampered with, which ensures that the artist’s works function as tradable assets with inherent value, which Vogler describes as “preserving the features of digital art while making it a scarce good at the same time”.

    A Los Angeles-based start-up called Verisart announced in July 2015 that it is using the blockchain to provide digital security to physical works of art which can be verified instantaneously. Both artists and collectors will be able to use the distributive technology to build a global ledger that will be able to document, verify and certify artworks. By equipping the blockchain with a unique hash value for each artwork, a distinguishable but secure, and purely transparent set of recordings can be created.

    The technology will also provide a layer of protection for sensitive information pertaining to buyer and seller. Indeed, the anonymity of a decentralised ledger is an appealing feature, according to Verisart founder Robert Norton, who believes that “powerful encryption to mask the identities of buyer and seller will be attractive to the art world&;.

    In contrast with physical works of art, digital art can take on a variety of forms, all with the aid of a computer. This, however, renders the artwork with problems surrounding authenticity protection and rightful ownership of the piece. The problem today for digital artists is the pressure of having to give much of their art away for free. The art ends up in the hands of platforms who have the ability to monetise it, while the artist receives nothing. The problem for buyers, meanwhile, is that the digital art can be reproduced at no cost, which makes it difficult for the buyer to ascertain if he/she is in possession of the original artwork.

    A tool now being developed to improve the digital art marketplace, Monegraph, provides information about the origins of an artwork whilst also clarifying the buyer’s rights upon purchasing an artwork. Monegraph intends to simplify the process for digital artists to construct licenses which can officially authorise the commercial use of their work. The licenses are split into 4 broad categories, which range from allowing non-commercial use of their work, to giving all rights to the buyer upon purchase.

    While Monegraph itself will store vital information including identification of the original artist and the current owner, the information will also be recorded on the blockchain. The company has stated that blockchain will provide a verifiable record of specific contracts being executed, as well as any associated licenses, which can’t be hacked. With each transfer work securely logged on the ledger, Monegraph can ensure who owns a digital piece of art at each moment can be easily ascertained.

     

    Diamonds Market

    The diamond industry also looks set to undergo significant changes under blockchain. FinTech company Everledger is using the technology to create a ledger which can store information about the origins of each diamond, thus reducing its potential to be used for nefarious purposes in the future. While certification which stipulates a diamond’s origin does currently exist in paper form, it can’t be constantly updated or accessed remotely, unlike Everledger’s blockchain-inspired ledger. Paper-based records can also be easily subjected to forgery.

    The ledger works by collecting 40 data points on each diamond that describe the physical appearance of each diamond, as well as its serial number and the ‘four Cs’ – cut, clarity, colour and carat weight. Everledger CEO Leanne Kemp uses the of certified diamond laboratories for this process, explaining that the laboratories effectively “digitize” the diamond, which Everledger takes to “put the digitized fingerprint into the blockchain”. Kemp has also explicitly stated that blockchain’s technology is being employed primarily for its immutability. Once an entry is written into Everledger’s ledger, it can’t be changed or manipulated – a vital property that is required to tackle fraud.

    By cross-referencing this data against the ledger to determine a diamond’s origins, therefore, it can stop the diamond from being sold for an exorbitant price. In this way, the ledger protects the interests of potential diamond buyers. Furthermore, data regarding ownership and provenance can be recorded on the ledger which makes the product difficult to resell. The digital fingerprint can be removed by criminals by recutting the diamond, but this is an expensive process to undertake, while the recut diamond itself is substantially lower in value than the original stone.

    Moreover, the existence of an immutable record of a diamond’s history will allow mining companies to ensure that the diamonds they are producing in rough-cut form will not eventually be used as ‘blood diamonds’ – diamonds used by militias to fund insurgencies. Securely tracking and tracing such diamonds along the blockchain will ensure they don’t end up in the wrong hands. Blood diamonds are currently estimated to make up 4% of the global diamond trade – this could be all but stamped out by blockchain.

     

    Advantage of Blockchain in Real-Estate

    Given how antiquated some of its business processes are at present, real estate could experience some of the most fundamental changes to its industry. Much of blockchain’s influence on the process at this stage is concerned with transfer of land titles and government ownership of land records – both of which are expected to drastically improve on blockchain’s distributive ledger. Much like the art and diamond industries, the advantage blockchain has over traditional methods of real estate business is the immutability of the ledger.

    At present, buyers and sellers exchange paper contracts pertaining to title companies, title insurance and many other items of business, which is being increasingly regarded as inefficient. In developing countries, moreover, such paper records are often stored by the government and are exposed to widespread fraudulent activity.

    Among the multitude of ostensible benefits to the real estate industry, finding figures of comparable sales for similar properties could be considerably improved upon under blockchain. Currently, this process is made difficult because owners often keep such price information private. Stuart Appley, CTO of San-Francisco-based commercial real estate company Shorenstein Co., is keen to see this information shifted onto the blockchain ledger. While preserving the anonymity of the key parties involved in the real estate deal, price information could be gathered easily and quickly, as could information about the property itself, such as address, previous owners and tenants.

    Ultimately, the efficiencies associated with blockchain could see the elimination of real estate entities such as title companies and other intermediaries. While the complexity of blockchain’s technology means that this may not happen for a some time, the wheels are undoubtedly in motion, and 2016 could witness some comprehensive changes.

    The post Blockchain to Help Eliminate the Middlemen in the Luxury Industry appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 11:44 am on June 3, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , italy, technology   

    Four Italian start-ups shortlisted for the Insurance IoT Europe Awards in London 

    Insurtech is becoming one of the most relevant sources of change in the sector, being characterized by a growing request for innovation of  both approach and .

    Italian insurance IoT is taking over the international scene thanks to the excellence of its offer, being one of the top countries globally – this applies to the car sector but also to health and home. According to the data elaborated by the Observatory of Connected Insurance, the Italian market has the highest levels of penetration – 16 % – in the car insurance sector. The Observatory of Connected Insurance is a think-tank created by Bain & Company which has managed to get together ANIA alongside 30 primary international insurance and reinsurance groups.

    This trend has been confirmed by the Italian start-ups in the sector that have a crucial pioneering role thanks to the innovation proposals that they bring as an answer to a sophisticated market request. The recent nomination of 4 Italian start-ups among the 5 finalists in their category for the Insurance IoT Europe Awards which will take place on the 7th of June in London, supports the fact that is ahead of the game.

    The shortlisted candidates for the Insurance IoT Newcomer Award are: DigitalTech, Domotz, Innotech Connected Solutions, Neosurance and Roost. The shortlisted candidates for the IoT Innovator of the Year Award include Baseline Telematics, Dacadoo, Homeserve Labs, ROC Connect and Things Network. Insurance IoT Europe (7-8 June 2016, London), is a two-day event that brings 150 insurers together to talk about how to thrive in a connected world as digital and big data collide. This is the only event focusing 100% on IoT for the insurance industry.

    The winners will be announced during the networking drinks reception on June 7th at the Insurance IoT Europe Summit. More information coming soon on the official website of the event: http://www.fc-bi.com/insuranceiot 

    Insurtech news

     
  • user 3:44 am on June 3, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , technology,   

    Wearable InsurTech Infographic 

    How is Influencing The Insurance Industry. A nice about Wearabble Insuretech from LifeInsurancePost.com.

    Wearable InsurTech infographics: How Wearable Technology Is Influencing the Insurance Industry

     

    The post Wearable InsurTech Infographic appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 3:32 pm on June 2, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , technology, Watchdog   

    EU Securities Watchdog: Distributed Ledgers Still Face Tech Challenges 

    ESMA has released a new paper on blockchains and as part of a fact-finding effort into the .
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 6:01 am on June 2, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , technology   

    Why the “newly banked” will become the biggest problem for digital banks 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAmEAAAAJGQ2NDdkNzdmLTY1MDAtNGMwNC1iNmQxLWI4ODMxZmQ0YzUzMg

    In the past three years, 100 million people have opened accounts for the first time in Africa. In China, there are 500 million people who are ‘newly banked’. In India, 187 million new accounts were opened in just one year on a governmental scheme. In the UK, around 100,000 people came into the stream, either for the first time or after a long break, in the last three years.

    This growing segment of the newly banked, who have emerged from the unbanked population and not-quite-yet-in-the-fully-banked category represents one of the biggest challenges for traditional and challenger in the world (yet, is not talked about as much as it should be!). They have a unique set of problems, and deserve a unique set of solutions – that are not available in the market today.

    The newly banked population does not find a bank account useful

    India’s unbanked population halved in the last four years, according to a report, which means 324 million new accounts were taken in that period. In just the past year, under a Prime Ministerial PMJDY scheme, 187 million new accounts were opened. However, 43% of these accounts lay dormant, with no balance and no deposits or withdrawals.

    In the UK, around half of the people with new, basic bank accounts still chose to manage their money and make transactions in cash. Around 15% of newly opened accounts were closed or abandoned.

    These figures paint such a dire image that it’s a mystery why banks are not taking more steps to bring the newly banked into the well-banked, or at least, the underbanked groups. Offering financial literacy is just one obvious element to fix the problem – the most important change needed is for the bank accounts to offer relevant transaction channels and sensible costs. In Africa, for example, mobile payments on basic phones have taken over the transaction ecosystem, and banks offering viable alternatives is a difficult proposition, yet possible.

    This is because the experience of moving into banking hasn’t been great

    The newly banked population probably used cash for transactions before the bank account, and transferred money using either mobile phone text messages (Africa) or specialised remittance firms (India and UK). In reality, it probably worked fine for them. There was a clear lack of perceived need.

    The expected customer experience (once the bank account is opened) is that it caters to a specific niche challenge the customer visualises would be solved with a bank account. It could be something like reduced bill costs or ease of bill payments, better loan facilities for agriculture, or sometimes availability of online shopping. A good example of catering to a specific demographic is that of six Zambian banks coming together several years ago to provide a secure money transfer mechanism that effectively replaced cash and cheques in the region. In China, a firm offers a SIM overlay that can be used on any phone to access bank accounts remotely.

    Solutions from banks, including those in partnership with technology firms, have to cater to these niche socio-demographic and geographic challenges. If appropriate pricing along with these direct solutions to solve niche problems are not present in a newly opened bank account, it’s unlikely this population will stay with the bank. They will either go back to their old ways with cash, or will look at apps or technology solutions to meet their specific needs.

    The newly banked population may not have access to a branch

    Over 66% of the newly banked population were considered “rural” by a study. If this population doesn’t have access to a branch, it is likely they will not get the personal customer service support or financial product aid they would otherwise be getting. Despite all the branch-bashing that banks face on a regular basis (especially from us fintech fans), branches are in fact one of the best ways to put the newly banked at ease. If full branches are not viable, banks could consider using retailer shops as mini branches, or using field agents to encourage financial access (both models being used exceedingly well in Ghana and Kenya).

    How do we keep them there?

    The only solution to keep them with a bank is unfortunately not quite pleasing: a bank will have to exert greater focus on customer service, financial literacy and access channels specifically targeting the newly banked. This does mean increased costs, increased effort and investment into segment personalisation, but in the long run, without this investment, this population is unlikely to remain with the bank. A simple preventative measure like this will also help them face the fintech competition head-on. A student lending app or an app that helps improve your credit score may appeal more to this young, financially untapped population than having a bank account that provides no clear benefits.

    Banks are increasingly partnering with fintech firms to handle this gap. Technology investments are great, but banks need to know and be in control of what those investments are being made for.

     

    Read the full blogpost at http://banknxt.com/56824/newly-banked/ 

    View my slides from the Dot Finance Africa event on fintech trends in the region:

    http://www.slideshare.net/DevieMohan1/africa-fintech-investment-trends

    Disclaimer: These are my personal views. 


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/deviemohan” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=””] is  FinTech Market Strategist | Industry Speaker, Blogger and this post was originally published on linkedin.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami