Tagged: banks Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 10:40 pm on October 15, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: banks, , , frontier,   

    New Frontiers in FinTech 

    aaeaaqaaaaaaaadtaaaajdk5ymvhotzklthhytmtndqzys1hyjm2lwnhmthkn2jhyti2zq

    In the mid 19th century, California awoke to a massive influx of prospectors eagerly seeking their fortunes in gold. A few brave souls actually managed to unearth some real and sizable nuggets – nuggets that made the arduous trip worthwhile. Nuggets that would eventually change their lives forever.

    Then came oil, and states like Texas, Oklahoma and again, California became the new frontiers for claiming your stake in the new “black gold” economy of the early 20th century. Smart, hardworking and lucky (often a big factor) prospectors toiled for years in what must have looked like barren wastelands to them. Again, only a relative few of these “wildcatters” went on to become the successful oil barons that eventually shaped todays oil industry.

    Today, generations are waking up to the realization that we are living in an era of even greater potential for humankind. Artificial Intelligence, Massive Data Sets, Powerful Computing Resources and a host of other advances are providing the framework necessary to allow the Information Age to finally deliver on its promise for a significantly better world.

    In the process they are providing a world of opportunities for those “wildcatters” of the 21st century; we call them names like Entrepreneurs, Founders, Innovators and Technology Startups.

    But, as with the gold and oil explorers of yesteryear, todays explorers are no less vulnerable to risk and the potential misfortune that goes with it. Instead of “fools gold”, empty wells and the perils of the wild west, we have fierce competition, intellectual property rights, market acceptance and scalability, to name just a few of the obstacles to success. Yes, todays bit hits are called unicorns for a number of really good reasons.

    That said, we’d never have the growth and prosperity we have today if we never set foot on the promised land, the moon and more recently, Mars (hey, at least our robots are there today).

    So…. a prospecting we must go! If for no reason other than it is in our DNA and we simply can’t help ourselves. To that end, I’d like to tell you about our little “exploratory trip” next week in New York City. It’s an event my co-chair and I from the MIT Enterprise Forum of New York City have been working on since June and it is called “New Frontiers in “.

    A brief excerpt from the description of the event reads:

    “Digital trends in the 21st century are rapidly reshaping how, where, and even why we invest. Disruptive innovation and the development of new tools and financial platforms are teaching the next generation all about investing, while allowing them to put their money where their hearts and minds already are.

    In this new investing paradigm, questions arise such as:

    • What are the best ways to attract the next generation of investors and encourage the existing ones?
    • How effectively are traditional and disruptive financial services leveraging today’s mobile, web and cloud technologies?
    • How can this reduce costs and improve the bottom line for investors, and financial institutions?”

    The event takes place on Tuesday next, October 18th from 5:30pm – 8:30pm at Anchin Block & Anchin LLP, 1375 Broadway 23rd Floor, NYC. We have well over a hundred technologists, investors, journalists, entrepreneurs and MIT alumni confirmed as attendees to date. You can find further details on the event on the MIT Enterprise Forum web site here.

    I wrote last week on how I learned to leverage the “Human Curated” concept the MIT Enterprise Forum provides to sift through the noise and daunting task of filtering out technology advances that are truly worthy of attention. I’ve only been a Board Member at the forum for a short while, but already it is proving to be the great “technology filter” I wrote about in my last post.

    If you can’t make this event, check out future events on Cybersecurity, , Virtual Reality and more on the events page here.

    What are your thoughts on this? Do you have tips and tools for helping manage the sheer volume of information finding its way to us in electronic form these days? I’d love to hear about it in the comments below.

    Daniel O’Sullivan is the CEO and Founder of Gyst, a company focused on developing software to allow technology to adapt to human behavior in real time.

     
  • user 12:18 am on October 15, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , banks, , , , , ,   

    Breaking Banks: Where Finance, Technology, & Politics Meet [AUDIO] 

    On this week&;s episode of , host Brett King is joined by four panelists from the world to discuss the intersection of government oversight, , and . The five weigh in on these issues, especially in regard to regulation, and what can be done to solve the problems ofRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 12:18 pm on October 14, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , banks, , differently, , measure,   

    Why fintech companies should measure performance differently to banks 

    In 2006 the Faculty of Business and Law at Deakin University in Australia launched a study into the correlation between directors’ remuneration and performance in the Australian banking sector. Spearheaded by the School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, they sought to add to a relatively deficient body of literature onRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 11:36 am on October 13, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: banks, beginner, , , , , for dummies,   

    A Beginners Guide to Blockchain Essentials (for Dummies) 

    aaeaaqaaaaaaaacyaaaajdgyyzq5otk4lwu0zdgtndgxos04ogi0ltbmmdkxmwi1mgnlmq

    The top 5 things about the blockchain that you should really know.

    The talk about seems ubiquitous. But what exactly is a Blockchain? More specifically, what are the Blockchain essentials that you should really know?

    Let’s dive in to find out more about and separate the hype from the reality

    What is a Blockchain?

    A Blockchain is a tamper-proof distributed public ledger that manages transactions.

    Think of it like a magical Google spreadsheet in the cloud, or more specifically on a network.

    Put simply, a Blockchain is basically an incorruptible distributed ledger of data, which can be used to store informational assets ranging from managing cryptographic contracts to transferring value.

    The most recognized application on a blockchain is transactions. The transferring of value from one person to another with no central intermediary, and without allowing a person or party to spend their bitcoin twice “the double spend rule”.

    What does this mean?

    It means that “value” can have a change of title and ownership from one person/party to another, without the need of a trusted third party to validate/govern the trade.

    How is that you might ask?

    Well, the governance is in the protocol, you will find more information on this below so keep reading.

    Beside being a ledger for “data of value”, or cryptocurrencies, Blockchain technology is finding broader usage in peer to peer lending, (smart) contracts managements, healthcare data, stock transfers, and even elections.

    Like any emerging and disruptive technology, no one can predict the future of Blockchain technology. But one thing’s for sure — it isn’t (just) for purchasing black-market goods and services!

    As a matter of fact, Blockchain technology is finding its way into big firms such as IBM, Microsoft, and major .

    Interest in the technology is driven by (fear of disruption) the fact that it excludes trusted third parties (banks and clearinghouses) during transfer of values, which in turn results in fast, private and less expensive financial transactions.

    Blockchain can facilitate the peer-to-peer transfer of anything that’s of value. This may range from assets, properties, and contracts. The most crucial and far-reaching Blockchain applications is applied in Bitcoin, with transfer of value, and Ethereum with its enhancement of smart contracts.

    Let’s jump in and learn the historical background of these Blockchain essentials.

    2. Bitcoin

    The Bitcoin currency, as many have come to know it, has been with us since 2008 when Satoshi Nakamoto — A person, or group of people, published a whitepaper about peer-to-peer electronic currency.

    The major innovation that bitcoin unveiled was direct and secure transfer of money or “value” directly to any party on the network. The Bitcoin currency network is decentralized — there’s no central authority — the underlying Blockchain technology is used to store information which is verified by a network of “miners” who validate all transactions on the network.

    How should I think of this?

    Bitcoin is simply a virtual currency system which resembles the real world cash system.

    Since it’s un-eponymous launch in 2008, through the boom and bust of the hype cycle, Bitcoin has continued to grow at an exponential rate and the fringe curiosity that consumed a group of highly capable (Tech Nerds) has ushered in some new upgrades that has brought the blockchain closer to the mainstream.

    3. Ethereum — Blockchain 2.0

    Ethereum is a blockchain system based on the concepts of bitcoin. It is considered a second generation blockchain technology that was designed to let any person, with a basic level of computer skills, to develop and deploy their own decentralized applications on the Blockchain.

    Just like the Bitcoin, Ethereum is decentralized — no one regulates or owns it — it has it’s own or “fuel” called “Ether” which acts in the same way bitcoin does. However, Ethereum has a few innovations worth noting. Primarily, a second application on its blockchain infrastructure called a “smart contract”, it’s own virtual machine which powers the memory and applications on the network called the “ethereum virtual Machine”, and its own programmable language called “Solidity”.

    Ethereum is kinda like Bitcoin on steroids but made to be more accessible.

    It was developed by Vitalik Buterin, a 19-year-old Russian-Canadian in 2013 as a Blockchain 2.0 — next generation Blockchain technology — with capabilities to be able to program and perform arbitrary and complex computations.

    Rather than just providing users with a set of predefined operations — like Bitcoin transactions — Ethereum lets users develop their own operations with the complexity they wish.

    4. Smart Contracts

    What is a “smart” contract?

    Well they actually aren’t that “smart”

    Think of them like self-executing dumb software robots that live and do business on a decentralized network.

    Smart contracts are autonomous computer systems, written in code, that manage executions between individuals on the Blockchain.

    The code resides at specified addresses on the Ethereum Blockchain. These contracts are powered by our friend the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and by Ether. It’s the little engine that could, that keeps all the smart contracts running on time and coordinates them with the rest of the network.

    In order to create an added layer of customization and security Ethereum created some high-level languages that are used to create smart contracts for the EVM. Solidity, Serpent, and LLL.

    These are the major innovation that Ethereum has brought to blockchains and it allows for many amazing types of autonomous programs.

    Next, let’s explore the consensus mechanisms in Blockchain.

    5. Consensus Mechanisms

    “When you interact with multiple parties, you need some sort of consensus mechanism to ensure everyone has got the right records”–Dan O’Prey, Co-founder of Hyperledger.

    Both Bitcoin and Ethereum use a decentralized system to confirm the transactions without relying on a trusted third party.

    Therefore, consensus, or coming to a uniform agreement, helps a network of autonomous programs and computers come to an agreed state of the blockchain without conflict.

    As a matter of fact, the consensus is the backbone of the Blockchain and any other decentralized and distributed technology

    The proof of work, proof of stake and closed consensus are the most common mechanisms used in Blockchain technologies.

    A: Proof of work

    The most common consensus mechanism that’s used for Blockchain technology is what’s called “proof of work”. It is the system used in Bitcoin.

    When a transaction is initiated, the information is stored in a candidate block which is filled with the transaction’s information. A cryptographic beacon is sent out to the mining network that the candidate block has been created, and the miners get to work on solving a cryptographic puzzle that has a prize for whomever solves it, in the form of newly minted coins/currency.

    Miners have what some would think of as supercomputers that are much more powerful than the average Person’s Macbook pro. These machines have a “hashrate” or computing power that gives them an advantage when competing to solve consensus problems for reward.

    I know what all you climate control advocates are saying:

    Doesn’t that demand a lot of electricity and processing power?

    The short answer is yes, the cost of mining is based primarily, on hardware, electricity costs, and to some degree temperature.

    The problem with the Proof of work consensus is that it requires the miner to use their supercomputer to try out millions computations per second, in competition with other supercomputers around the world, to determine if the Blockchain can be updated or not.

    B: Proof of Stake

    The main objective of this mechanism is to allow stakeholders, the people with the most invested, or owned in the Blockchain ecosystem to have the strongest incentives to lead in the provision of consensus solutions for a Blockchain transaction.

    In simple terms

    Proof of stake consensus allows miners that have more “money”, cryptocurrency, or “skin in the game” to have a greater opportunity to mine blocks and make decisions for the network.

    The process starts by the miner consuming his/her cryptocurrency — commonly referred to as the kernel — which provides privileges for updating the Blockchain which is similar to Proof of work.

    However, the hashing computation in Proof of stakes is done using a limited search space where stakeholders with the greatest stakes have the ability to mine a commensurate allocation of the network, and are effectively stewards of the Blockchain system.

    Think of it like: the more a miner has, the more they can get, and the more they can decide.

    The one benefit of this controversial crypto-economic system is that by allowing stakeholders with incentives take charge of consensus the mechanism reduces the computing power required for consensus.

    This should make the climate control kids happy, but

    The main problem of this mechanism is that disadvantages other miners in the network since only the “richest” stakeholders are permitted to have control of consensus in the Blockchain.

    C: Closed Consensus

    In a Closed consensus mechanism certain nodes are required to put up a security deposit in order to participate in updating the Blockchain.

    This consensus mechanism doesn’t require mining, and is growing in popularity in some banking and insurance segments.

    The management of the consensus is done using security deposits which incentivize the validators. The “arbitrators” — conflict management nodes are the enforcers on the blockchain and the adjudicate when something is not write or if a miner is not acting fairly.

    The main objective of using an arbitrator’s protocol is to enforce consensus among the autonomous nodes in the Blockchain.

    If a validator authenticates a transaction which the arbitrators have considered illegitimate, then the validator losses their security deposit and they also forfeit their privileges of providing consensus in the Blockchain network in the future.

    Conclusion

    Now that you understand the basic essentials of Blockchain technology you should be able to distinguish very easily:

    What is a blockchain?

    How does bitcoin work?

    What are the major innovations that The Ethereum blockchain brought to the technology?

    What is a smart contract?

    What are the different types of consensus mechanisms that power a blockchain?

    Hopefully, this inspires further exploration and your own personal discovery, in what everyone is talking about, and how perhaps you might be able to join in the conversation and or project/experiment. if you want more information that is friendly and easily accessible please see our other post here: How does the Blockchain Work?

    The main take away that you should get from this article is that understanding the blockchain is not that hard, and when you do, you have the ability to affect your team and industry in ways that you might not thought possible in the past.

    I’m always interested in meeting blockchain startups, and technologists who are creating innovative products, so please feel free to contact me or by email at [email protected]

    Collin Thompson is the Co-founder, and Managing Director of Intrepid Ventures, a blockchain startup and innovation studio that invests, builds, and accelerates Blockchain and companies solving the world’s most difficult problems. Collin focuses on early stage investments, innovation and business design for corporations, governments and entrepreneurs working with blockchain technology.

    Originally published at intrepidreview.com on October 3, 2016.

     
  • user 7:36 am on October 13, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: banks, , , , , private blockchain,   

    Private Blockchain or Database? 

    aaeaaqaaaaaaaalpaaaajdhkotywzgu5ltu3ndmtngvloc05ngy2lwmxzdhmmge3ntzkmg

    How to Determine the Difference

    Introduction to a Private Blockchain

    A is a system, commonly known as a “Distributed ledger” that has an access control layer built into the protocol [1]. This means the network participants have control over who can join the network, and who can participate in the consensus process of the .

    This is in contrast to a public blockchain, which is open for all to participate in — as a user, as an entity that determines the validity of transactions, and the consensus process. Private blockchains, therefore have a very different level of security than public blockchains like [2].

    Private blockchains are a class of distributed ledgers that use transactions and blocks, first described in Bitcoin. Distributed ledgers are shared databases with access protection rights, with defined rules on what types of changes can be performed by what entities.

    The value of distributed ledgers at the enterprise level arises from the ability to do away with the reconciliation of data among participating entities [3]. This is especially the case with financial institutions that trade with one another.

    A lot of effort on the back-office today is spent in the reconciliation of records among different institutions [4]. Instead, distributed ledgers allow financial institutions to maintain a structurally consistent shared of transactions. This allows each participating institution to read data from the distributed ledger and be guaranteed that it is valid and reconciled against the data held by the other participating institutes.

    Difference between a Public and Private Blockchain

    Distributed ledgers are inspired from Bitcoin and other public blockchains. However, they differ in their fundamental characteristics of access and security promises.

    The security of a public blockchain like Bitcoin comes from its proof of work, which makes it mathematically impossible to fake or reverse transactions without miners colluding, using the current state of  [2].

    On the other hand, the security promises of distributed ledgers and private blockchains are only as good as the honesty of the entities validating the transactions. There are no mathematical guarantees behind the irreversibility of transactions in a private blockchain.

    Blockchain vs. Shared Database

    There is considerable debate in the community in the value of a private blockchain over a shared database. Some, like Prof. Arvind Narayanan of Stanford, contend that private blockchains are just another name for a shared database [2]. Others, like Gideon Greenspan of Multichain see several differences between private blockchain and SQL like databases, from disintermediation to robustness [5].

    Traditional databases are completely contained within one entity, irrespective of their structure (SQL or no-SQL type databases). This includes read and write access, which is only possible via applications controlled by the entity to which the database belongs [9]. Shared databases, on the other hand, involve read and write access involving multiple entities.

    Private blockchains mimic the security process utilized by public blockchains like Bitcoin, but do not involve mathematical guarantees at the validation level or with respect to irreversibility.

    However, they still make use of cryptography and data structures like Merkle trees to ensure non-valid transactions aren’t added to the blockchain [6].

    At the end of the day, private blockchains provide higher levels of error checking and transaction validity than regular shared databases.

    Even though they don’t use proof of work, blocks of transactions are validated using some other forms of consensus mechanism. This can still be chosen to be Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT).

    The most popular such algorithms include Raft [7] and Juno [8]. These consensus protocols work based on a leader-follower model, wherein for each block a leader is selected who creates the block and adds to the blockchain. There are various ways in which errors and anomalies are then corrected by the system.

    The Security Paradigm

    Shared databases in the past have suffered from the inability to prevent malicious activity. This would be the case, for example, when one of the participating entities is hacked, and that entity writes ‘corrupted’ data into the shared database, thus making it invalid for everyone involved.

    This specific problem also exists in centralized databases.

    Private blockchains solve this problem using cryptography and technologies similar to what Bitcoin and public blockchains use.

    In addition, the consensus protocols used by private blockchains today are “BFT Hardened”, such as Juno [8]. This improves the security features of the blockchain by protecting against insular hacking cases, thus preventing individual participants from acting in a malicious manner.

    Why Banks and Financial Institutions Choose a Private Blockchain

    and financial institutions have been increasingly investing in blockchain technology.

    However, most of this effort has gone towards the private blockchain space.

    There are many reasons for this. Private blockchains scale significantly better than public blockchains [6] and the network parameters, such as network congestion and transaction fees are known in advance.

    The underlying protocol development is also more predictable in the case of a private blockchain, and gives more control to the banks that control it.

    Also, banks and financial institutions are regulated entities that cannot operate over open protocols without performing due diligence of the parties involved in the transaction [10]. It is unclear whether regulations require miners to be identified for certain classes of transactions to provide settlement finality.

    There is also a reputational risk involved in using Bitcoin, which has been much maligned in the media with the associations to drug trade and exchange hacking.

    However, even today, many private blockchains ‘anchor’ to a chain like Bitcoin periodically to ensure the integrity of its data.

    Challenges in Launching Private Blockchain Consortiums

    By their very nature, private blockchains require different entities to come together and agree to a common set of standards by which it will operate. This is challenging due to legacy inertia and due to the differing requirements of different participants in the system.

    There are also unanswered questions around who should have the power to add or remove members, and which jurisdictions should be allowed to intervene (for example to reverse transactions due to legal or regulatory reasons).

    The first problem is partly being solved by Hyperledger, a Linux foundation initiative that aims to provide common blockchains standards [11].

    The future of these competing ideologies will be incumbent on issues of governance, scalability and reputation. These mandates will be required by incumbent institutions but conceived by innovative blockchain startups that see opportunity in mainstreaming the concepts of a blockchain, distributed ledger, and consortium chains.

    Originally published at intrepidreview.com on October 4, 2016.

    I’m always interested in meeting blockchain startups, and Chief innovation officers who are creating transformational products, so please feel free to contact by email at [email protected]

    Collin Thompson is the Co-founder, and Managing Director of Intrepid Ventures, a blockchain startup and innovation studio that invests, builds, and accelerates Blockchain and companies solving the world’s most difficult problems. Collin focuses on early stage investments, innovation and business design for corporations, governments and entrepreneurs working with blockchain technology.

     
  • user 12:18 am on October 13, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , banks, , , , , ,   

    More Banks Working on APIs in 2016, But Bureaucracy Remains a Problem 

    (application programming interfaces) are fast becoming integral to the banking world, but corporate culture has not yet caught up with the , according to data from a survey conducted by the Open Bank Project together with Bank Innovation. In 2015, 62% of survey respondents indicated corporate culture and Read More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 6:40 pm on October 12, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: banks, , , , Emirates, ICICI,   

    Emirates, ICICI Complete Cross-Border Blockchain Transaction 

    Major in Dubai and India have embarked on a series of trials with the help of Infosys.

    Source


    CoinDesk

     
  • user 3:35 pm on October 10, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Bankkonto, banks, , digitale, , , Identität, , , Wenn   

    Be your own Bank, oder: Wenn die Digitale Identität das Bankkonto ersetzt 

    Kann es sein, dass die Kunden ihr demnächst in gewisser Weise selbst verwalten? Mit der Verbreitung digitaler Identitäten könnte dieses Szenario Realität werden. Bereits vor einem Jahr war die Frage auf diesem Blog ein Thema:

    Digitale Identitäten lösen das Bankkonto und damit die klassische Bankverbindung ab

    Die könnte hierbei eine Schlüsselrolle übernehmen. Beispielhaft dafür ist das Projekt be &8211; your own bank. Näheres dazu ist in dem Beitrag “Identity on the blockchain” — chapter 2 zu erfahren. Als quasi letzte Verifikations-Instanz fungiert hierbei die e-Residency Card von Estland.

    e-res-id-card

    Weiterhin heisst es in dem Beitrag zur Rolle der Banken in der 2.0 Architektur:

    The idea we wanted to test out was what to us will be the “bank 2.0” architecture — with being not custodians but just facilitators. The Blockchain enables, for the first time in history, to have a third party offering financial services while keeping the users fully in control of their funds.
    Ganz abgesehen davon, ob das Projekt die Erwartungen erfüllt, bleibt festzuhalten, dass die Banken durchaus auf die Rolle von facilitators reduziert werden könnten.

    Robin Knox von Intelligent Point of Sale dürfte mit seiner Einschätzung nicht alleine sein:

    With advances in online identity verification also disrupting the market, the role of the traditional bank is in danger of diminishing. Who ultimately manages your money need not be the person it always was. (in: How technology will transform Scotland’s banking sector)

    intelligentpos

    Dieser Artikel erschien zuerst im Bankstil Blog

    The post Be your own Bank, oder: Wenn die Digitale Identität das Bankkonto ersetzt appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 7:35 pm on October 8, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: banks, , ,   

    Why Banks Want Own Cryptocurrencies 

    Amidst news of major , both government and private, considering developing their own Blockchains for internal use, a question has to be asked: is there even a point? Given the seemingly self-defeating nature of using decentralized currencies in highly centralized operations, Cointelegraph asked top industry experts from Agentic UK, Lisk and Steemit about their opinion on the matter.

    Lucas Cervigni, Managing Director of Agentic UK, explains:

    “Recently, central banks have taken the asset to the next level by starting to research Cryptocurrencies of their own. As modern banking works under the fractional reserve system, this research makes sense. Through this system, banks are able to issue loans as long as they keep 10% in reserve. In turn, this creates money with each loan. That is not possible with and therefore the banks have begun considering centralized and government controlled cryptocurrencies. However this is a serious matter for the banks to consider, as should the central system issue all of the money, there is no doubt the dynamics of the fractional reserve system could change. Ultimately, the smaller banks could be left out of business.”

    State banks eyeing Blockchain

    People’s Bank of China (PBoC) announced on their website about their own digital currency conference, urging their team to speed up efforts to release its digital currency. Bank of Englandand Bank of Canada have also considered developing digital currencies.

    These types of currencies are called Central Bank-issued Digital Currency (CBDC). What are the implications of CBDC? To create a cashless society, steal the spotlight from Bitcoin and other privately-issued currencies, or to achieve a more accurate monetary policy?

    Banks want control

    Ned Scott, Founder of Steemit, thinks the bank-issued cryptocurrencies will differ from the protocols we got accustomed to:

    “It would be interesting to see what design choices the banks make for their Cryptocurrencies’ protocols and how they integrate the currency with their business. With every cryptocurrency there are variables that developers massage in terms of emission and the way they release the protocol into the wild. My feeling is that the profile of these Bank-issued coins would be very different from many of the decentralized protocols we see today. Banks are likely entertaining the idea more seriously if they feel they can control the currency, as well as gain from its use and possibly their manipulation over it.”

    A necessary evil

    Max Kordek, Founder of Lisk, eхplains why banks may see in Cryptocurrencies a necessary evil:

    “This topic requires the consideration of multiple perspectives. If I was a cryptocurrency user with little involvement in this space or knowledge of the current regulations, creating additional currencies could be difficult to comprehend. However, in reality certain laws and obligations could make a customized, maybe even private, Cryptocurrency a necessary evil.

    On the other hand, maybe current Cryptocurrencies do not meet the technological requirements a bank deems necessary for a digital currency. For example, perhaps they require a specific peg, specific Block-time, or in fact multiple currencies on one single .

    It is impossible to be certain of whether a bank-owned, government-owned or public Cryptocurrency will dominate in the future, but I do hope the latter is the case.”

    Buterin: Private Blockchains have Advantages

    When asked as to what the reason for the banks’ sudden interest in Cryptocurrency, the majority of our audience seem to agree that it is some combination of wanting to stay relevant and trying to control the future development of the Blockchain.

    A reasonable stance, considering how Bitcoin, and other Cryptocurrencies have already proven their worth by enabling the users to send transactions faster, cheaper, and with less restrictions, compared to bank transfers.

    However, Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, argues that this trend is not entirely political. According to him, private Blockchains can, in certain contexts, offer several technological and financial advantages, compared to the public ones.

    Those advantages stem from the greater control that a bank is able to exert over a private Blockchain, and include less to no risk of a 51% attack, greater level of privacy for the Blockchain’s owner (duh) and even cheaper transactions.

    All in all, currently there is no clear consensus regarding the value of privately-owned Blockchains, and their impact on the overall ecosystem, if any, it remains yet to be seen.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/lucascervigni” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Lucas Cervigni (Lucce)”] is Managing Director – AGENTIC GROUP UK

     
  • user 12:07 pm on October 5, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , banks, , ,   

    Google´s Larry Page buys a “major global bank” 

    aaeaaqaaaaaaaahwaaaajdewotmxnwezlwe2zjatngq0my1hyme1ltblzgjjyzk4mty0yw

    Can you imagine the reaction of a bank employee if one morning he reads this headline? 

    In the spring of 2010 I polled the students of the Master of Finance about how many of them would rather work for Google instead of a bank. Survey results: 5%. Last Friday I have made the same question for the current group. Survey results: 96%.

    Despite the efforts to adapt traditional business to the rapidly changing world, the truth of the matter is that dominant players today are mostly new ones: Apple and Spotify control the music distribution versus Sony and Virgin; Amazon Kindle and Apple iBooks control book distribution; Uber controls taxi industry; Skype and WeChat control phone calls market; Amazon and Alibaba control retail vs Walmart or Best Buy; WhatsApp controls messaging space vs AT&T or Telefonica.

    1. Can there really be a new dominant player in financial services?

    Not so well-known as the above, Yu´e Bao, the money market fund of Alipay (Alibaba) is the largest fund (USD 100 billion approx) in its category in China vs Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), China Construction Bank or Bank of China. In fact, Yu´e Bao can be considered as the most successful mobile product in the world. There is no minimum amount, and customers can withdraw their cash anytime. Yu’e Bao now has more investors than China’s equity markets.

    This is only the tip of the iceberg regarding changes in the financial services industry.

    2. Why is so difficult for traditional business to make the transformation?

    The hardest thing to change in a corporation is not the tech system but its . The technical side is relative easy to solve: hire a full Silicon Valley team and make it from scratch. But how easy it is to change the culture of +100k employees?

    Executives underestimate how hard it can be to drive people out of their comfort zones.

    The real issue is the status quo of the current employees. What does a successful digital banking mean? It means that in two years you will not need 50-70% of the employees, nor todays countless committees. And what is the conclusion if you have an unsatisfactory digital banking transformation? Probably the bank will be closed in five-ten years and you will have to fire 90% of the employees. So, for the 50-70% of the current employees, the best option is the status quo, as probably they will maintain their comfort zone for their next working years.

    3. How does the culture need to change?

    • Risk Building/ Failure tolerance.

    • Pilot projects rather than large initiatives.

    • Hire for culture fit ahead of tech fit.

    • Drive scalable learning.

    Citigroup has invested in Betterment, Santander in Ripple, BBVA in Simple, etc. In an acquisition the buyer transmits the culture to the acquired company. Even more when the buyer has +100k employees and the acquired has less than 300. If you want to take advantage of the culture, you need a process to quickly infuse the cultureof the acquired company into the main operation. If not, at the end of the day what will probably happen is that 300 employees adopt the bank culture, or end up leaving the company.

    4. How to infuse the fintech culture into a major bank?

    Basically there are three tools for the digital transformation: the People, the Strategy and the Execution.

    4.1. People

    • Adopt a talent replenishment model.
    • Rethink traditional models of working (employee/employer models, more partners).
    • Balance soft and tech skills in all company levels.
    • Educate the ones that might be transformed. In my experience more than you think.
    • Above of all you need transformative leaders.

    It´s rare that originality comes from insiders, especially when they are as entrenched and comfortable as the financial services industry.

    Just a reflection about how to attract talent at scale: Would you go to Silicon Valley? What is the replacement cost there competing with Google, Apple, etc.? What would be that cost in places like Mexico or Colombia? I can ensure that Mexican and Colombian engineers have the same or even better knowledge than their neighbors. Some tech funds are moving from India to Bogota! Yes you read correctly, Bogota!

    4.2. Strategy

    Any of the employees should know to answer two simple questions:

    • Where does the company want to go with the digital transformation? Where do I want to go? (Objectives).
    • How will I know I am getting there? (Key results to ensure progress is made).

    4.3. Execution

    First of all, you need to make everybody feel uncomfortable with the status quo. That does not mean a general employment reduction, nor to maintain every employee.

    Success in your digital transformation requires addressing three areas:

    • Diagnosis (Why?)
    • What to do – initiatives in the short and long term-?
    • How to do it?

    Then bring passion for execution for all the crew; this is a heroic trip, you will invent the future of banking. You and your team will not want to work in Google but become the “Google Bank”.

    can play a defensive or an attack digital transformation strategy. The ones that play a defensive game will be probably bid by Google´s Larry Page…at distressed levels…

    @Quesada_Vicente

    *Headline names have been chosen randomly, with no other intention than drawing the attention.

    Note: This is a third article about Digital Banking Transformation. For further details:

    Digital Banking Transformation: BBVA vs. Banco Santander

    Disruptive Mentality in Banking


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/vicentequesada” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Vicente Quesada”] is Entrepreneur. Investor. Professor. Transformation Catalyst

     

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami