Updates from user Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 6:04 pm on May 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , ,   

    Why ABN Amro Wants to Separate Bitcoin from the Blockchain 

    ABN managing director Karin Kersten discusses her firm’s strategy and use cases.
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 5:24 pm on May 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , ,   

    London Workshop Explores Blockchain Identity in Finance 

    The &; KYC conference in hosted a on using to improve know-your-customer processes earlier this week.
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 4:18 pm on May 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Can Fintech firms learn anything from Football? 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAfBAAAAJGJiNmU1NjU2LWEyOTYtNGFiZC1iYjM3LTg0ZDYwNTUzYjFmMw

    Leicester City are the supreme champions, having decisively booted away all the legacy teams that crossed their path, systematically vanquishing the challenges of the now not so mighty Spurs, Arsenal, Manchester City and even Manchester United, and yes sadly West Ham too. At all times they remained focussed and confident, never deviating from their master plan. Just one season ago, if anyone had predicted that they would win the world’s most coveted football league title, everyone would have said they were nuts. But against all odds, 5000/1 odds, they did it – and they did it in style.

    Can the new players in the world of learn anything from this remarkable performance? How much of the success Leicester achieved was due to luck, and yes there is always an element of this in everything we do? And how much of it was to due to the supreme management skills of Mr Ranieri, the collective determination of his team, and some sparkling individual performances to see off the footballing Goliaths turning their silverware dreams into dust?

    Sadly, far too many start-up firms still go under prematurely, not because they didn’t have a great idea or because of the lack of need. All too often it is because of the unnecessary own goal of poor management and a lack of well-defined processes and discipline. It might sound a tad old-fashioned, but the fact remains that strong management together with a cohesive and agile business development and growth plan supported by a clear communications strategy are the vital ingredients needed if one is to have any chance of dismantling the established status quo. Contrary to some modern thinking these essential components do not stifle or limit innovation, in fact the complete opposite is true, as they empower success.

    Today in all walks of life whether it’s football or the commercial world, the greatest leaders are those who truly embrace collaboration, and encourage their teams and individuals to achieve the unachievable. And Leicester City, those wily young Foxes, have proved this in spades. C’mon you Fintech firms!


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://uk.linkedin.com/in/clare-walsh-5972143″ connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Clare Walsh”], is consultant and this article was originally published on linkedin

     
  • user 12:18 pm on May 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , David, , , , Thompson, , ,   

    Pirates with Ties interview with David Thompson of Western Union 

    In the&; with &160; series, we&160;are interviewing people who are leading digital transformation and innovation in major Financial Institutions. &160;is the&160;Executive Vice President, Global Operations &; Chief Information Officer at . In this interview we learn about WU Edge, their recently launched cross border payments platform for SME. Daily Advisers&160;provide strategic consulting&;Read more Pirates with Ties interview with David Thompson of Western&160;Union
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 11:35 am on May 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , unbanked   

    The Unbanked Population: Missing Links in the Fintech Ecosystem | FinTech 

    As the specter of a financial slowdown in China looms, economic effects are beginning to cascade through­­ the entire Southeast Asian archipelago, heightening the unease of investors and businesses. are braced for dwindling dividends and financial conventions are under threat from the growth of . According to ’s 2015 Global Annual Review, in 2014 VC investments in Fintechs leapt to $12.2 Billion compared to 2013 and in 2015, with more than 12,000 Fintech companies moving into every banking activity and market.

    For the penurious villager in Cambodia, however, the peaks and troughs of economic cycles bear miniscule impact. Driven to the periphery by the financial ecosystem, this burgeoning class represents the least financially-educated of the social hierarchy. Due to a lack of financial structure, this band of individuals – comprised of micro businesses and the financially challenged – encapsulate Asia’s economic paradox.

    Despite the growing realization that long-term economic growth needs to be built on the foundation of financial inclusion, the World Bank’s recent report revealed that only 27% of citizens in Southeast Asia have access to a bank account. Cut off from conventional resource channels, a significant number of the region’s population have no avenue to raise capital or apply for credit. The promise of social mobility remains elusive for the “”, perpetuating the vicious cycle of poverty for generations.

    The emergence of Fintech has disrupted a host of industries, fronting new opportunities and striving to fix old problems. FinTech has shown a potential in driving economy and gradually upgrade the welfare of more than 600 million people in the region. Harnessing the potential of data analytics, Fintech has chartered new paths; amalgamating business know-how and social networks to fill barren gaps left by commercial banks.

    However, most platforms, which includes P2P lending and crowdfunding, target small and mid-sized businesses with high-growth potential. While these additions supplement commercial banks and enhance the capital financing ecosystem, the clientele hasn’t shifted dramatically.

     

     

     
  • user 6:00 am on May 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: axa, , ,   

    Blockchain & Insurance: early thoughts 

    . 10 letters of headache, 10 letters of wonder. Over the last few years and months, this technological piece of art has been gaining traction among developers, journalists and citizens. And quite naturally, the blockchain hype has also knocked on the doors of : our corporate venture capital fund AXA Strategic Ventures invested in Blockstream, our trend sensing outposts AXA Labs reported a lot of activity in the field and I led an internal effort by the AXA Foresight squad to raise awareness on the and its potential.

    What do insurers basically do for their consumers? They collect money from policyholders, manage it and run a process of claims to re-allocate the pooled money to the relevant policyholders. Now Blockchain allows to program trust in a distributed way, which threatens the central role of insurers in the current process. If we consider the barriers to entry in the insurance sector, the disruptive potential of Blockchain is even more striking: capital constraints could be overcome by crowdfunded Decentralized Autonomous Organizations; claims management could be automated through smart contracts; the power of the brand would disappear as trust can be programmed; actuarial skills could be replaced by open logs of claims and data science.

    If we look at the topic through the lens of the value chain, the disrupting power of Blockchain is all the more tangible:

    1. Product design: blockchain-based products will hold more promises to customers (e.g. instant payments) than traditional ones

    2. Pricing: as blockchain allows transparency of information, a combination of Blockchain and Data Science could allow dynamic price adjustments

    3. Distribution: Blockchain could become a new distribution channel, as blockchain players sell services that combine well with insurance (e.g. stadium ticketing through Colu could be complemented with an additional stadium insurance option linked to the ticket)

    4. Underwriting: automated contracts combined with blockchain-based identification tools such as tradle.io or uPort could enable advanced insurers to close a sale in no time

    5. Claims management: with simplified products and smart contracts, the first blockchain insurers will potentially post expense ratios much lower than incumbents, all the more if back office is automated too (e.g. blockchain-based automated request for claim adjustment)

    Obviously, insurers do not only offer plain coverage but also services that Blockchain will have a harder time disrupt. I nonetheless take very seriously initiatives like Dynamis (a blockchain-based unemployment insurer) for several reasons: those initiatives are led by skilled people that should be considered our benchmark in terms of blockchain mastering ; such disruptors are able to get round incumbents strongholds and willing to recreate the insurance industry from scratch, which makes any condescending attitude towards them highly dangerous; they invent new classes of products (in the case of Dynamis, through leveraging LinkedIn), which can be beneficial to the whole insurance industry.

    “With a good deal of work and humility, insurance incumbents can also thrive on Blockchain”

    With a good deal of work and humility, I believe insurance incumbents can also take advantage of the vast opportunities of Blockchain: we could help blockchain users better secure their private keys, act as oracles (i.e. trusted data providers) for disruptors, or improve user experience through more trusted and rapid claim handling. Assistance companies could provide field services for pure players like slock.it (Ethereum-based renting solution), thus providing incumbents with their fair share in the success of disruptors.

    “Blockchain is a great promise. Let’s deliver it”

    Blockchain is a promise for our consumers. A promise of undisputed trust, a promise of radical efficiency, a promise of smart insurance products. Keeping those promises cannot be anything else than a tremendous opportunity for insurers. Let’s get to work!


     
  • user 12:18 am on May 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , interviews, , , ,   

    What we learned about the transformation of Consumer Banking from 5 Pirates with Ties interviews 

    One of the things that makes this job so much fun is the ability to talk to the really smart people in a dynamic market. Doing a startup is hard;  we are entrepreneurs ourselves so we get that. However we want to counter the myth that all innovation comes VC fundedRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 9:40 pm on May 28, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Blockchain? For me, the coin has dropped 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAf6AAAAJDYxM2U4ZmFiLTAwZWEtNGY0Yi05YTYwLWQ2NjM3ODgyYTQzYQ

    We know by now that tech-land moves at lightning speed. Radio commercials for Digital Transformation consultancy? Check. I’ve heard them.

    But over the past few months, there’s been some technological advancements – in the relative margins of the internet – which could potentially cause quite a fundamental stir. I’m talking about .

    First a big caveat: I’m not a techie. I can pretend I know the difference between NodeJS and PHP, but I don’t really gét it. I look at for what it means. And recently, I’ve come to realise that this whole Blockchain story is a lot more than Bitcoins, ‘virtual’ currencies and unintelligible tech-geek-babble.

    Blockchain, WTF?

    The techies will kill me, but let me have an attempt at trying to explain what Blockchain is, to me, the non-techie. Blockchain is a kind of database-technology, the engine behind for example. It is effectively a decentralised verification system, where a global network of computers verifies and creates transactions, following a complex cryptographic code. Once verified, the transaction cannot be changed. Ever.

    Sounds like Chinese? Just remember one thing: ‘decentralised’. It means that transactions no longer need a centralised authority.

    There are a few Blockchain versions. And a crucial one is Ethereum. The thing that makes Ethereum different from Bitcoin is that it is effectively a platform, onto which applications can be built. Those applications can utilise such a decentralised computer network ánd the cryptography that comes with it. Ethereum also has a currency, Ether, which serves as the fuel for the system, this engine.

    The thing that made me pay attention is that the platform, this network of computers, can create transactions that go beyond digital currencies. The Bitcoin-blockchain does one thing: transfer Bitcoin. But with Ethereum anything’s possible; we’re talking ‘transactions’, any transaction. A crucial aspect of Ethereum is Smart Contracts, programs to well… program and automate transactions. At least, that’s what I think it is.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAd4AAAAJDU1N2FkNmE5LTc2YWQtNGU2ZS05MzVmLWRjMjZhZmI5ZDI0OA

    Example? In Brooklyn, smart citizens have built an energy network with Ethereum’s Smart Contracts. Energy, created by solar panels on one side of the street, is being sold to neighbours on the other side of the street. Again: without the involvement of a central authority.

    “That all sounds grand, dear Gerrie. So let them be, those tech geeks”, I hear you think. Well, no. Over the past few weeks I’ve started to get the feeling that as an entrepreneur, government or all round smart person, it is becoming important to stop watching from the sidelines and get more actively involved in this blockchain story. And I see a few reasons.

    Speedy, speedier, speediest

    The tempo at which new things happen in the blockchain world is very, very, very high. Ethereum as software isn’t even a year old. Friends of mine, who’ve been reading on and working in the subject matter for a while now, were perplexed a few weekends ago. That was the moment when the DAO-hub launched. A kind of platform, built on Ethereum to fund and support other blockchain projects. Kind of like a decentralised version of a Venture Capital fund. At least, that’s what I think it is. Today. Maybe I’ll understand it better tomorrow.

    But fact is: after 2 weeks it had become the biggest crowdfunding project ever, raising more than 11m million Ether. Current value of 1 Ether: about 12 euros. These are no longer the margins of the internet, methinks.

    Profit!

    Ethereum’s website says: “like the internet was supposed to work”. Their mission is to develop an internet that is more free, more trustworthy. It is definitely connected to a certain vision of the world. But at the same time, it’s also about profit, making money and business opportunities. That’s what makes it so unique. I think.

    For every old school CEO who still doesn’t really believe in the internet or e-commerce, there are smart entrepreneurs who will soon (read: now) start looking at how the transactions involved in for instance ‘shopping in a supermarket’ can be reconfigured when you look at them through a Blockchain lens.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAeSAAAAJDhlNzlhY2VmLWEyOTEtNDU5Ny05YTA2LThiZTY1NDdhYmQ4Mg

    Plus, these transactions aren’t limited to the internet. Connect the Blockchain concept to the internet of things and you’ve just added another billion use cases. At Slock.it – a bunch of leading thinkers and makers in the community – people are working on a smart lock, which only acts when all the conditions of a Smart Contract have been fulfilled.

    Take the use case AirBnb. I rent a spare room to you. So when the smart lock know it’s you and it knows you’ve paid, it opens up. At the same time it triggers the financial transaction and – why not – books and pays the cleaning service when you leave.

    Another fundamental aspect is that there’s an incentive system built into the core of Blockchain. It is technology after all and that requires hardware. Computer geeks who run the transaction software on their servers get a fee. That’s what keeps the decentralised network rolling. However, the fee is a fraction of the 10-ish% that AirBnB charges or the +20% that Uber deducts from its drivers’ earnings.

    A real sharing economy

    We need to pay attention because Blockchain is a technology that goes to the core, to the root. The word “revolution” gets mentioned occasionally. So does “Web 3.0”.

    And without getting all too excited, I’m starting to see why. The internet was about disintermediation and the democratisation of information etc. But what happened? It became the bedrock for centralised platforms, who facilitated transactions at scale: AirBnB for holiday accommodation, Facebook for communications, Uber for transport,… At a price obviously.

    These are amazing applications and I use use all of them. But the decentralised aspect of the blockchain technology makes it possible to redraw and reconfigure the relationships between user and supplier, in other words: the transaction as well as its value.  The cost of a transaction decreases. The validation and the trust grows. An “internet of transactions”, “internet of trust”, “internet of value”,… these are all phrases that are being used in the numerous chat boxes and communities.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAdKAAAAJGU2ZjNkMjgyLTVkMjEtNDQ0My1iNWJhLWI0YTAxOTFiMTFkMw

    Example! Consensys is one of those companies who are building applications on the Ethereum framework. Ujo is one of them, “rebuilding the music industry”. Not only does it make the transaction between artist and fan more direct; it can also reconfigure the relationship between artist and session musician, between artist and film-producer-who-wants-to-use-that-song, between artist and whoever or whatever,… It’s not something Spotify is doing.

    Arcade City does in a blockchain kind of way what Uber does: match demand for transport solutions to supply. The difference: the value is being distributed in another way.

    Certainly, these are all experiments and prototypes. But it is significant that AirBnB has already bought up a Blockchain start-up. Their business model of ‘being the intermediary’ could potentially come under pressure.

    The disruptors being disrupted? What’s next? Well, everything that’s a transaction can be looked at through a blockchain lens. Could a brand like Nike pay fees directly to people who watch their ads? And what with a concept like ‘issuing a driving license’, a typical example of centralised validation ánd transaction.

    Learn, Unlearn, Relearn

    Technology. Ethics. Profit. That’s what it says on the website of DAO Hub. And it’s this mix that makes the matter so complex.

    So, show of hands: who has ever tried to buy BitCoin or Ether and moved them to a different wallet? I have a sneaky feeling it won’t be too many of you. And that’s a shame: because ‘that world’ involves different concepts of wallets, transactions, security,… So we have to practice, we have to get used to this new ‘language’, we have to make mistakes, get ripped off, be confused.

    Because to be honest: buying Bitcoins is peanuts, compared to understanding Ethereum. And then we haven’t even started on DAO, the concept of a Decentralised Autonomous Organisation.

    So, us, non-technies, need to practice, because this story is getting momentum.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAdvAAAAJDVlNGQ2NGQ5LTIyZmQtNDQwMC1iNjJjLTEwMTlkMjc4YzE1NA

    Smart developers are currently learning Solidity to build blockchain-applications and create Smart Contracts.

    Smart investors have known for a while who Vitalik Buterin is (inventor of Ethereum, 22 years old, no shit). They’ve been looking at daohub.org for the past few weeks and have been able to decide for themselves whether it’s a good idea to invest in DAO-tokens.

    And what do entrepreneurs do? From small start-ups to the Microsofts and IBMs of this world: they’re all trying to get to grips with the blockchain-thinking. The question is: do they recalibrate their value proposition and their added value in a fundamental way? Or are they copying Blockchain technology to implement behind closed doors, like seem to be doing?

    And what about governments? Because when it comes to transactions, validation ánd identity, there’s a lot of thinking to be done. In Honduras they’re re-building the concept of land ownership on the blockchain. The innovation unit of Unicef is looking at blockchain to tackle the problem of identity with refugees.

    But also closer to home, the penny has dropped. In my hometown of Antwerp, the council’s innovation unit A-Labs is building a blockchain application to facilitate communities. They call it Locals.world and are working on a currency of their own, the LocalCoin.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAjIAAAAJDQyMGY2MjM2LWMzNTQtNGE5My1hNDQ3LTMyOTE1MzZiMmY3ZA

    In the blockchain chat communities, where I spend a bit of time these days, I read things like:

    “I’m kind of dreaming of buying Tesla powerwall towers and put smart contracts on them!”

    Or

    “We could invest in anything and collectively we’d be more informed than an individual to make good investment decisions.”

    These guys are on a different level. And if we, laymen, want to get our hands on the wheel, we need to get flight time. We need to read, produce, buy, do. It’s up to us to understand blockchain and to translate it, take it away from the tech-talk. That way the discussion and the learning process will speed up and the possible implementations will become clear much faster.

    Anyway, I’m starting to get it. Starting. And I’m going to dig deeper. If you’re interested, here‘s my growing list of blockchain-related bookmarks.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerriesmits” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Gerrie Smits”] is Digital Strategy Consultant (www.gerriesmits.com) and this post first appeared in Dutch on datanews.be)

     
  • user 5:40 pm on May 28, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    A Framework for Identity 

    IDEO coLAB member Dan Elitzer explores a for digital using and other technologies.
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 3:35 pm on May 28, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , ,   

    Blockchain – to Replace Government in Real Estate 

    When it comes to , the immutable ledger that underpins , much of the limelight thus far has been on its potential to disrupt the finance industry. However, the transformation that may experience from applying blockchain could arguably be just as profound. Unlike financial services, where technological innovation has largely been embraced in the pursuit of profit, much of real estate’s business conduct remains firmly stuck in the past. Many operating methods within the industry have remained unchanged for 50 years, if not longer.

     

    What is a land-registry in a blockchain?

    Land registry systems contain records of a country’s land transactions, and operate on centralized ledger systems at present, with the centralized entity normally being a agency. At their best, the systems guarantee title of all land assets; however, in reality they provide incomplete security of tenure, are marred by corruption and frequently result in ownership disputes. In contrast, a blockchain land registry system would be decentralized.

    This would mark a distinct improvement on the incumbent system, in that every authorized network member would have an authenticated copy of the registry, rather than just one centralized party. Given that everyone can see the records, therefore, the process would be more transparent, which again minimizes the potential for foul play. Removal of the centralized entity is also likely to be cheaper and more efficient – the operating cost of the land registry in England and Wales in 2013/14, for example, was nearly £240 million.

    Ragnar Lifthrasir, who is President of the International Bitcoin Real Estate Association (IBREA), is among the pioneers in developing a real estate model which can operate on the blockchain. He identifies three specific uses of the technology in the industry – purchasing, escrowing and the recording of title ownership and associated transfers. Escrowing is perhaps the least developed idea currently, although ostensibly it would be similar to a common bank transfer, only in this case the transferable amount is first converted to bitcoins which are then put into escrow. Nevertheless, as long as both parties agree to use the blockchain over a government solution, Lifthrasir argues, then nothing can stop them.

     

    What are the benefits?

    A blockchain would allow someone to upload land title documentation to the network, which other users can record and verify if needed. This would provide proof that this person is the first owner of the documents, and decentralised network verification would prevent forgery. When it’s time to transfer title, the document simply requires ‘rehashing’ (encrypting) by the owner to prove he/she is in possession of the document.

    During the actual transfer process, a ‘coloured coin’ system &; which US stock exchange Nasdaq currently uses to settle securities – would be employed. A concept first outlined by Swiss computer scientist and Bitcoin core developer Mike Hearn, coloured coins are non-fungible tokens which provide the owner with private keys, thus allowing only the owner to transfer ownership while preventing fraudsters from corrupting the process.

    The elimination of costs associated with title insurance and fraud, according to Lifthrasir, is the biggest advantage of using blockchain. This has been a persistent problem with the current system of centralised government records. Criminals are able to fake title ownership, often simply by using editing software to stipulate transfer of property ownership in their favour, and at negligible expense. Indeed, title insurance itself is a $ 20 billion industry, and Lifthrasir estimates that at present it is costing around $ 1 billion to combat title fraud.

    Some argue for a replacement of the entire common law system, which currently requires a laborious examination process of public land records before a plot of land is transferred from one party to the other. Joe Dewey and Shawn Amuial, attorneys at US law firm Holland & Knight who specialise in real estate and finance, for instance, are in favour of replacing the government recording of deeds, mortgages and other instruments in land records with the blockchain, as government records are prone to human error and corruption.

     

    Reducing Bribery and Corruption

    Indeed, corruption within land registry has plagued much of the developing world, with insufficiently secure governmental systems being regularly prone to manipulation. Honduras is among the worst. USAid Land Tenure estimates that 80% of privately held Honduran land is untitled or improperly titled, while only 14% of citizens legally occupy properties, with less than a third of those citizens being officially registered. Land title disputes in Honduras have led to violent conflict and widespread fraud, with cases of the registry system databases being hacked into and bureaucrats being able to secure the most luxurious properties.

    As a solution, US technology start-up Factom announced in May 2015 that it had agreed to build a secure land title record system for the Honduran government using blockchain technology, in conjunction with title software company Epigraph. Transferring land records onto the blockchain, therefore, could be a reality in the not too distant future.

    In doing so, Factom CEO Peter Kirby believes that Honduras’ land registry system would leapfrog many systems in the developed world. Although recent reports suggest that the partnership has stalled, Factom is adamant that progress is still being made, so it may take longer for the project to come to fruition than initially thought.

    Ghanaian NGO Bitland also claims to be developing a blockchain-based system for entering land title records, in a bid to correct for the numerous failed attempts by the government to develop a fair and efficient land administration system. At present, courts in Ghana are reportedly being inundated with land dispute cases.

    Bitland hopes to reduce this burden, and will use the Factom/Epigraph technology, as well as satellites and GPS to verify the accuracy of plots of land. Buyers will also be able to discover the last owner of property rights and land ownership disputes, while the disputes themselves can be made visible to the network, thus ensuring greater security. However, as with Honduras, much work is yet to be done.

    Registry system problems, moreover, are not solely confined to the developing world. The US State of Massachusetts has a specific court which has jurisdiction over the registration of title to real property, while in Canada, 95% of land in Newfoundland and Labrador is considered Crown Land, which results in land disputes regularly ending up in court. Kirby believes that the most important issue is for courts to have a true history of what has happened during such land dispute cases. Immutable records based on “evidence and precedent” will be instrumental in adjudicating land disputes, and can also then become part of the permanent record of the land, which the blockchain technology can ensure.

    In terms of taking land title records away from government and onto the blockchain, it may prove to be more difficult in some countries than others. In the US, for instance, title companies exist and have large databases of land ownership records, in addition to the government’s own records.

    The sheer number of landowners (and thus the number of records), coupled with the overall size of the US, makes the task of shifting from government records to blockchain a lot tougher. However, Dewey and Amiual point to the fact that title companies are likely to act as allies in the technology’s development, rather than enemies, especially if title insurance can still play a role in addressing those risks which are not eliminated by the blockchain.

    Lifthrasir believes blockchain will offer significant improvements over the current government-administered system. It would allow the industry to avoid the inefficiencies that arise from the presiding record keeping practices used by government. While Kirby is willing to work alongside the government in the Honduran case, Lifthrasir does not think it is a worthwhile investment of people’s time to teach governments about blockchain. The opportunity to transact directly under blockchain means that the role of government becomes redundant.

     

    Conclusion

    Instead, IBREA’s intention is to gather together the real estate industry professionals who favour moving elements of the business onto the blockchain, especially operations pertaining to purchasing, escrowing, and recording of transfer of properties. As Lifthrasir puts it, “So, as long as people in the real estate industry start deciding to use the Bitcoin blockchain to record the transfer of properties, why bother with the delay, cost, and inefficiency of the government?” He is convinced that 2016 will be the year that title management moves onto the blockchain, and in turn, that the technology is developed enough to be used in the real estate industry.

    The post Blockchain &8211; to Replace Government in Real Estate appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami