Updates from user Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 7:58 am on September 12, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    The Rise of Data Capital 

    In The Rise of Data Capital wird die Entstehung einer weiteren Kapitalform beschrieben. Inzwischen haben die Daten, vor allem die personenbezogenen, einen hohen ökonomischen Wert. Die Geschäftsmodelle von Facebook, Google und Amazon würden ohne die Möglichkeiten, Daten zu sammeln, aufzubereiten und zu verwerten, nicht funktionieren.

    The Rise of Data Capital-1 is one of the most important assets of every online consumer service created in the past decade. Google, Amazon, Netflix, and Uber have all realized that data is more than just a record of something that happened. Data is raw material for creating new kinds of value, especially digital services. And sometimes, these digital services—whether offered on their own or wrapped around physical products—disrupt incumbents and reorganize entire industries.

     

    Datenkapital kann sogar sehr beständig sein:

    Data capital is the recorded information necessary to produce a good or service. And it can have longterm value just as physical assets, such as buildings and equipment, do.

     

    Obwohl ihr Geschäftsmodell in seinem Kern aus Informationsverarbeitung besteht, haben die Banken den ökonomischen Wert der Daten erst spät, womöglich zu spät erkannt. Ihr Informationsmonopol, ihre Rolle als die Clearingstelle der Informations- und Warenströme in der Wirtschaft haben die Banken verloren. Diese Funktion haben heute in weiten Teilen die großen digitalen Plattformen wie Apple, Amazon, Google und Alibaba übernommen. Durch den Zugang zu riesigen Datenmengen sind die Plattformen in der Lage, ihre Angebotspalette systematisch auszubauen:

    Platforms increase their staying power by adding new features that support more linked and adjacent activities for players in each market.

    early attempts to value data capital

    Die Banken müssen sich entscheiden, welche Rolle sie spielen wollen. Überlegenswert wäre die Wiederbelebung des Relationship Banking. Die Bank als Interessenvertreter der Kunden gegenüber dem unstillbaren Datenhunger der sog. Datenkraken. Oder wie das WEF in The Role of Financial Institutions in Building Digital Identity schreibt:

    &; FIs act as established intermediaries in many transactions and are therefore well positioned as identity intermediaries

    &8211; FIs are typically trusted by consumers beyond other institutions to be safe repositories of information and assets

    data's economic identity

    This article first appeared here

    The post The Rise of Data Capital appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 7:57 am on September 12, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Modelling, , ,   

    Fintech Startup Takes Aim at Financial Modelling for SMEs 

    Today I’m coming to you live from Xerocon South in Brisbane, Australia. Xerocon is cloud accounting behemoth Xero’s flagship event – a conference that brings together accountants, bookkeepers, cloud integrators and add-on partners from within its 500 strong global partner ecosystem, the latter all vying for the hearts and mindsRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 6:40 pm on September 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Liberty   

    Why Our Economic Liberty Depends on the Blockchain  

    Should a ‘trustless-ness’ be a requirement for transacting safely in a free-market economy?
    CoinDesk

     
  • user 4:54 pm on September 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Entrepreneurship and the Id Machine 

    shutterstock_157504361

     

    Slavoj Zizek coined the term Id to describe an engine that allows for the materialization of one&;s desires. Id is the unorganized part of one&8217;s personality which contains one&8217;s most instinctual drives. The Id contains the libido which is the source of energy that is unresponsive to reality.

    Zizek applied the Id Machine to two movies by Andrei Tarkovsky: Solaris and Stalker.

    In both movies, protagonists are faced with an &;area&; &; in Stalker the area is called the room, located within the zone &8211; where their desires are materialized. Zizek names this &8220;area&8221; the Id Machine. The Id Machines are different in each movie. In Solaris, protagonists do not have any control over which desire materializes itself once they are in the Id machine, thus leading to terrifying realizations. In Stalker, protagonists need to figure out what they desires. The realization they sometimes do not know what they desire also leads to terrifying realizations.

    Tarkovsky&8217;s philosophical musings, as interpreted by Zizek give us one Id Machine that reveals the perils of our passive nature and another Id Machine that reveals the perils of our active nature. we get tripped by the unknown parts of our desires, by what we think are our desires and by our inability to formulate our desires.

    I think parallels can be drawn with entrepreneurs, startups and venture investing. VCs and entrepreneurs all enter an Id Machine at some point, where our desires materialize. Outcomes are never certain. Some outcomes are unexpected, others should have been expected, very few come out as expected.

    A Startup&8217;s main protagonists &8211; entrepreneurs and venture investors &8211; need to go through much introspection to sift through their desires. By desires I mean goals, visions, strategy, tactics. Clarity and transparency are paramount. Paradoxically, as the libido is the source of energy unresponsive to reality; the entrepreneur &8211; and to a lesser extent the venture investor &8211; also needs to be &8220;unresponsive to reality&8221;. In other words, the entrepreneur needs to be unshackled from the constraints of reality in order to achieve his dreams. However, she should not make complete abstraction of reality. Complete abstraction from reality leads to either Solaris or Stalker&8217;s Id Machine, with suboptimal results.

    I was recently asked what I actively sought in startups when investing. My answer was interoperability with the real world, pointing to the necessity for a blockchain startup to take into account the realities of the law, especially in the context of securities law in the capital markets space.

    I thought further about my interoperability answer in light of Tarkovsky&8217;s movies and Zizek&8217;s interpretation and believe I apply it to all startups. Further elaborating on interoperability, I define it as the quality to will a new reality while understanding the constraints of a current reality, incorporating these constraints within one&8217;s thought processes, and using them to the best of one&8217;s advantages. This is the quality I seek in an entrepreneur and in a startup. In Freudian terms, I seek an entrepreneur who can apply the right ego touches to her id. Too much ego touches and the id&8217;s desires never materialize, too little ego touches and the traps of the Id machine come in play. The right ego touch is also essential in regulating the id&8217;s tendency for instant gratification. Organic growth with the right tempo is often not recognized as one factor of success with startups. There are many pitfalls with fast growth and/or high valuations within short periods of time (too little growth also being a killer). This I view as being part of a certain interoperability with the real world, or with certain natural laws of organic growth.

    I find the above amusing on a personal note as I have always been more Jungian than Freudian in my interpretations. That may provide me material for another post.

    FiniCulture

     
  • user 3:40 pm on September 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Knowledge, , Proofs, , ,   

    The Trend Towards Blockchain Privacy: Zero Knowledge Proofs 

    George Samman, former CMO of Fuzo, looks at how solutions like could preserve on platforms.
    CoinDesk

     
  • user 3:35 pm on September 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: bezahlt, DemoSCOPE, , , Umfrage   

    DemoSCOPE Umfrage – So bezahlt die Schweiz 

    Rund die Hälfte (47%) aller Männer kauft mehrmals täglich ein. Deutlich tiefer der Wert bei Frauen, wo nur gerade etwas mehr als ein Viertel (28%) mehrere Einkäufe pro Tag tätigen. Insbesondere Männer mögen es dabei bequem und bezahlen stets oder gelegentlich mit der Kreditkarte (67% versus 55% bei den Frauen).

    Und rund ein Viertel (23%) könnte es sich vorstellen, dabei ganz auf Bargeld zu verzichten. Darum verzichtet beim Online-Shopping auch nur gerade ein Siebtel auf die Kreditkarte, so die Erkenntnisse einer bevölkerungsrepräsentativen nationalen Studie von *)

    Gerade Personen, die täglich mehrmals etwas kaufen, verwenden die Kreditkarte um ein Mehrfaches häufiger. Bequem und schnell, das scheint bei vielen das Motto zu sein. So erstaunt es nicht, dass Personen, welche die Kreditkarte regelmässig nutzen, häufig (61%) mit einem „Tap“ (kontaktlos) bezahlen.

    Knapp jeder Dritte aller Befragten (29%) bereits kontaktlos. Männer doppelt so häufig wie Frauen und Deutschschweizer rund 50% häufiger als Westschweizer. Dennoch scheint noch nicht ganz allen bekannt zu sein, dass mit fast jeder Kreditkarte (rund 90%) „getappt“, sprich kontaktlos bezahlt werden kann &; und das an zwei von drei Zahlterminals.

    credit-card

    From: Pixabay

    Am häufigsten wird die Kreditkarte beim Online-Shopping (84%) eingesetzt. Männer leicht häufiger als Frauen (87% versus 81%). Auch Ferien- und Flugbuchungen (77%) sowie Ausgaben im Ausland (76%) werden bevorzugt mit der Kreditkarte beglichen. Und nahezu die Hälfte aller Befragten mit einem höheren Einkommen will von Bonusprogrammen profitieren.

    Wenn nicht mit der Kreditkarte bezahlt wird, kommt die Debitkarte mit 73 Prozent noch vor dem Bargeld (71%) zum Zug. Rund ein Viertel (23%) aller Befragten kann sich vorstellen, ganz auf Bargeld zu verzichten. Besonders 18-34-jährige und Männer im Vergleich zu den 50-65-jährigen und Frauen.

    cashless.ch

    *Die bevölkerungsrepräsentative Online- wurde von DemoSCOPE im Zeitraum von 6. bis 17. Juli durchgeführt. Befragt wurden 921 Personen aus der ganzen im Alter von 18 bis 65 Jahren im Auftrag der Interessengemeinschaft Schweizer Kartenanbieter.

    Featured Image: Pixabay

    The post DemoSCOPE Umfrage &8211; So bezahlt die Schweiz appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 12:18 pm on September 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    Credit Karma Hits 60 Million Users, Will Add Mortgages 

    now has 60 . Yes, that zero is supposed to be there. And the company, which gives out free credit scores and generates revenue from selling lending leads, is adding 1 million to 2 million users &; which the company calls &;members&; &8212; per month, a Credit Karma official told anRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 11:36 am on September 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , mobile payments, , ,   

    Will PayPal’s Deals With MasterCard And Visa Spark a Revolution in Mobile Payments? 

    aaeaaqaaaaaaaafcaaaajgfhzdhjmzrjlwu3zjetngi5ni05mja3lwyyowm1odm0ywfkoa

    famously split from eBay Inc. last year leaving many to wonder what their next move would be. Over the years the online-payments pioneer had picked a few unwise fights with heavyweights such as and . But there finally seems to be a change of strategy.

    PayPal Joins the Fold

    PayPal sealed deals with Visa and MasterCard that will soon allow customers to select their credit or debit cards as default payment methods rather than just their bank account or PayPal balance.

    By calling a truce on their battles with the major card issuers in the industry, it seems the initiative is to promote PayPal as a universally accepted method of payment both online and offline.

    It’s refreshing to see , credit card companies, and PayPal putting their differences to one side. Traditional banking had made no secret about being resentful of PayPal’s free bank transfers and heavily promoting its online payment system over conventional banking.

    The recent deals seem to satisfy all parties as they realize they are all stronger together than apart. Ultimately, PayPal will enjoy lower fees and obtain a visibility in physical stores for quick and easy payments. MasterCard and Visa will get their hands on customer data they were previously locked out of. But more importantly, they should see a massive increase in online and .

    The strategic decision by PayPal enhances their reputation as a universally accepted payment method while card issuers receive much-needed help with their mobile payments initiatives.

    Payment Practices Upheaved

    PayPal is encouraging its customers to pay using their service as a mobile wallet. The blurry line between online checkouts and those we find in physical shopping malls is close to being torn down. In many ways, 2016 is proving to be a watershed moment regarding payments as users begin to embrace smartphone and contactless payment cards.

    Numerous reports suggest the recent deals could subject PayPal to losses in the short term. But it’s clear the online payments giant is playing the long game here. With 157 million active account holders worldwide and widely known as one most common online payment methods, getting Visa and MasterCard on board to pursue the high street is a very shrewd move.

    Cultural Change Vis-à-vis Digital

    All consumers are essentially carrying around a super computer in their pockets. The ability to book a restaurant table, cab or accommodation on the other side of the world with a few taps of a smartphone screen has changed everything.

    The bottom line is that all consumers now have a simple set of 21st-century demands. The choice to pay when, where and how we want in a seamless, simple and secure method. The easier companies make exchanges, the faster they will happen.

    The biggest obstacle to widespread mobile payments is industry fragmentation. Platforms such as Apple Pay, Android Pay, and Samsung Pay are all heavily reliant on devices and software. This is not the way it should be. If you replace your smartphone, it should not affect how you pay for items online or offline.

    Bluntly put, people want a universal platform that will make it easy to share and spend money. Maybe other businesses will begin to follow the positive example set by Visa, MasterCard, and PayPal.

    Digital Transformation Shows No Signs of Abating

    The simplification and personalization of everything shouldn’t be labeled disruptive. Technology is being interwoven seamlessly and invisibly into our daily lives. If anything, it’s the opposite of disruption. It’s imperceptible.

    Businesses that team up in this way and merge their forces have a better chance of underpinning consumer’s lives from the ground up. This unity is a point in case.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/anuragharsh” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Anurag Harsh”] is Founding Executive at Ziff Davis

     
  • user 7:36 am on September 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Money Transmitter License, ,   

    How to get Money Transmitter License coverage for your Startup? 

    aaeaaqaaaaaaaaipaaaajdewodrhzmrhlwu1odctnduyyi1hzta1lwrhnwuwzwnlzmzing

    Some practical advice on how to go about it.

    In the US, one of the biggest challenges faced by startups in the space, is that of money transmitter licensing. Obtaining money transmitter licenses is no easy feat. It involves a large amount of paperwork, money and time. It can take up to two years to amass all 50 state licenses.

    Needless to say, not every fintech requires money transmitter license coverage. For most, licenses would not be a requirement, but for those who do touch money as part of their business model, getting money transmitter licenses from the states in which their clients are based is important.

    While there is a lot of legal documentation and opinions on who is classified as a money transmitter, the basic tenets are:

    • You are neither the originator of the transaction, nor the beneficiary of the transaction.
    • You are a financial intermediary.
    • You can apply a fee for processing such a transaction, even if it is a de minimischarge.
    • As part of processing the transaction, you get to touch the funds, i.e. the funds collected on behalf of the parties traverse through your bank account (even if only for a little while).

    If you are meeting one or more of the tenets above, chances are you might be considered a money services business and be required to have money transmitter licenses (or MTLs for short).

    MTLs are issued by the financial regulators of each state. You can click here to see a list of all the financial regulators for all 50 States and US territories.

    MTL Options

    I’ve written extensively regarding the various options pertaining to MTL coverage (Read: US Money Transmitter Licensing). However, there is another option that many are not aware of.

    It is called the Bank Sponsorship, i.e. a bank handles the money movement and channeling on your behalf. You don’t get to touch the money and the bank provides license coverage on their license.

    The Sponsoring Bank works with an entity called the Program Manager (PM). In this scenario, you have two contracts: one with the bank and one with the Program Manager that manages the entire sponsorship program with the bank and provides the APIs, etc.

    The way the arrangement works is that the bank handles your money. You are not allowed to touch the funds. You simply instruct the bank how to move / process funds. These instructions are sent via the API, which the bank then acts upon.

    Program Manager’s core responsibilities include:

    1. Provide the API that is specifically geared to/for the payments industry. This means implementing additional ID verification, AML controls, accounting, filters, customization, etc. (remember there are two components to a transaction, the US side and beneficiary side. The PM stitches it all together in a compliant manner for not only the Bank, but also from the State/Federal rules regarding money transmission (eg: Reg E, etc.)
    2. Aggregates other technologies and processors, for example if you bring in a card processor who you would be allowed to work with, then this processor is integrated with the PM.
    3. Overall monitoring and ensuring everyone is playing by the rules, anomaly detection etc.

    Finding a Sponsoring Bank for you.

    In order to find a sponsor bank, a mini business plan is required from you. The mini business plan (or dossier) is then realigned to the template/format that the – that I work with – require.

    As there is a pool of banks at the back end who would like to win your business, they don’t want to be made known immediately, hence the proxy through my company.

    The business plan allows them to discreetly look at the opportunity and determine if they want to proceed ahead. The dossier contains basic information about the fintech business (or startup), your photo ID information for background check, your business plan, your website, LinkedIn profiles, your compliance program, projected volume for the next 12 months and the foreign countries you will be terminating in (if applicable).

    Based on the interest received from the bank(s) a further engagement between two parties is established (after signing off a referral agreement for myself naturally).

    Once the bank has shown interest, the entire process takes between 60–120 days to get approved. Average time consideration is 90 days.

    A time-motion flow-of-funds diagram is required. This would be needed in the final form when submitted to the bank, however, in the interim period you are free to send across your flow of funds diagram. You can find an example of the flow of funds here and edit this diagram on http://www.draw.io

    Under the agreement, the bank sponsors the product and any/all accounts opened by your customers are actually bank accounts being opened at the bank. It is imperative to note that you cannot bring in your own AML/KYC, etc. You must follow the bank’s AML/KYC guidelines.

    Secondly, to work with the bank, you have to use one of their basic/core services. You cannot just unilaterally rely on the bank to provide you coverage. That is not the intention the bank is looking at. What the bank wants to do, in order to sponsor you, is to go into a revenue share agreement with you. By doing so, you have to subscribe for one of their core services, like ACH, Card Processing, etc. You cannot bring 3rd party payment processors into the equation, until and unless the bank approves of it.

    The bank is not interested in a flat-fee model, as that is indicative of a license rental and is wrong and looked down upon by the regulators.

    For providing you with FBO (For Benefit Of) Coverage for your funds and in turn licensing under their umbrella, the bank wants to go into a revenue share partnership with you. The bank is always looking to increase the number of accounts it has as well as increase the overall number of dollar volume that flows through it.

    With the bank sponsoring you, and providing you umbrella coverage, you’re not bound to invest in heavy and expensive licensing that can take up to 2 years to obtain and not to mention, cost in excess of US$ 1 Million (including paid-up capital).

    Please kindly fill out the application on the following link:https://faisalkhan.com/remittance-as-a-service-application/

    Please also note, the following information would be required to do basic due diligence.

    • A copy of your passport (for the person who would be the signing authority in your company)
    • 12 months projections
    • List of countries you would be seeking permission for
    • Average ticket size for each corridor
    • Currently monthly volume on your existing license

    If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to ask.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/faisalkhan99″ connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Faisal Khan”]

    About The Author: Faisal Khan is a passionate fintech expert, cross-border money transfer specialist and certified speaker & moderator. He is the CEO of Faisal Khan & Company, a boutique firm specializing in banking and payments consultancy. He also serves as the co-host of a weekly podcast called Around The Coin.

    He has received extensive acclaim for his achievements and has been 1 on the Top 38 Fintech Blogs and even is one of the 38 Most Influential People to Follow in Fintech in Asia. In addition to financial , Faisal Khan loves to help people and does this through volunteering his time and writing on the popular Q&A website, Quora. His efforts have earned him the title of Quora Top Writer2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016.

     
  • user 3:36 am on September 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Bilanz, , , Liste,   

    6 Fintech Unternehmer in Bilanz Top 100 Banker Liste 

    6 haben es doch tatsächlich in die Top 100 Bankers Liste der Bilanz geschafft. Zumindest sind die Fintechis diejenigen welche in der Top 100  ohne Kravatten glänzen.

     

    Marc P. BerneggerMarc P. Bernegger, Rang 74
    Investor FinLeap

    Er ist unter anderem Mitgründer der Plattform Usgang.ch, die 2008 vom Axel-Springer-Konzern (zu dem auch gehört) gekauft wurde. Heute ist er vor allem als Fintech-Investor aktiv, etwa bei FinLeap, einer auf die Finanzdienstleistungsbranche spezialisierten Firma mit Standort Berlin, für die er in der Schweiz Aufbauarbeit leistet.

     

    Stefan A. HeitmannStefan A. Heitmann, Rang 82
    CEO & Co-Founder of MoneyPark

    Dr. Stefan Heitmann ist Gründer und CEO des Finanzdienstleisters MoneyPark (vormals MyMoneyPark). Zuvor war er als Partner bei der Beratungsfirma McKinsey für den Bereich Banken in der Schweiz verantwortlich.

     

    Johann GeversJohann Gevers, Rang 87
    Chef Monetas

    Seine Monetas bietet eine Plattform, auf der alle Arten von Vermögenswerten transferiert werden können. Es braucht dazu ein Smartphone und eine App. Starken Anklang findet diese in Afrika, wo die Firma Übereinkünfte mit 16 Ländern unterzeichnet hat.

     

    Michael StemmleMichael Stemmle, Rang 87
    Gründer Additiv

    Additiv ermöglicht Banken mit Beratung und Software-Lösungen den Eintritt in die digitale Welt. Bekannteste Entwicklung ist der «Investomat» für die Glarner Kantonalbank, ein Tool für Online-Portfolio-Management.

     

    Urs HäuslerUrs Haeusler, Rang 93
    CEO DealMarket

    Urs ist CEO von DealMarket. Vor DealMarket war er im Management Team von amiando &; Europas führendem Ticketing-Anbieter im Event- und Businessbereich. Als Chief Sales Officer u.a. verantwortlich für die Internationalisierung von amiando und den Aufbau der Offices in London, Paris und Hongkong.

     

    Niklas NikolajsenNiklas Nikolajsen, Rang 93
    Chef Schweiz

    Seine Zuger Firma Bitcoin Suisse macht mittlerweile rund 120 Millionen Franken Umsatz pro Jahr, überwiegend mit dem Handel von Bitcoins und anderen Kryptowährungen. Mit BitPay stellt er ein Zahlungssystem, das die Stadt Zug für kleinere Zahlungen akzeptiert

     

     

    fintech unternehmer top 100 bilanz banker liste

    The post 6 Fintech Unternehmer in Bilanz Top 100 Banker Liste appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami