Tagged: robo Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 7:35 am on June 4, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 4b1dadde6992, , , fintech in germany, , , robo   

    Why German FinTech is now trending 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAdXAAAAJGM3YzM2OTlmLTUwOTItNGI2MS05ZDMyLTFiMTlmZmUzMGQzOA

    Something is happening in .

    The local  industry is up-and-coming – objectively so. While for some time, the domestic Fintech scene was not commonly known for its breathtaking speed of innovation, things are changing rapidly.

    Only within the last few months, a significant uptake in activity within the  Fintech industry is visible:

    • Deals and investments: In Q1 2016, investments into German Fintechs have soared. A respectable €107 million was invested in local companies, up from €10 million one quarter before (more). And this trend of growing investor appetite was already on the horizon last year. While across Europe, overall Fintech investment more than doubled between 2014 and 2015 (+120 percent), investments in German Fintech ventures grew by staggering +843 percent over the same period (Source).
    • Mergers between Fintech start-ups: P2P lender Kapilendo and equity-based crowdfunding site Venturate announced their merger in April 2016 (more). Around the same time, Berlin-founded payleven and SumUp merged to form one of Europe’s largest payment Fintechs (more).
    • New business models: The first Banking as a Service (BaaS) platform just launched in Berlin: Solaris Bank aims to provide an API-based banking platform for Fintech startups – uniquely built on the basis of a fully regulated German banking license (more). – see also Pascal Bouvier’s in-depth blog post)
    • International growth: More and more German Fintechs are growing up and become international players. FidorBank recently started to offer its services to UK customers (more). Berlin-based Spotcap is targeting SMEs in Spain, Australia and the Netherlands. Despite the recent controversy, Number26 continues to expand into 6 other European markets

    What is more, German financial institutions themselves are at the forefront of this new Fintech momentum. Some examples how they are spearheading the current movement:

    • Take-over of Fintechs: The 220-year old German private bank Hauck & Aufhaeuser just acquired one of the largest local -advisors easyfolio in May 2016 (more). Deutsche Boerse took over trading network 360T, one of the rising stars in the German Fintech scene, in October 2015 (more).
    • Minority investments: CommerzVentures, the investment vehicle of Commerzbank, has already completed more than a handful of Fintech investments. In May 2016, the 4th largest German bank by asset size, DZ Bank AG, completed a 25% investment into the invoice marketplace company TrustBills (more). 
    • Partnerships with Fintechs: Germany’s largest bank, Deutsche Bank, just announced three strategic partnerships with domestic Fintechs: In the near future, Deutsche Bank’s customers will be offered robo-advisory services (in cooperation with Fincite), multi-account aggregation (partnering with Figo) and European short-term deposits as investment opportunity through the Deposit Solutions platform (more).
    • Business model innovation: In April, Germany’s second largest bank, Commerzbank, announced to be working on a disruptive online P2P lending platform for small businesses (more). The nation-wide Savings Bank Finance Group (DSGV) seems to be silently developing a mobile-first bank for the young generation – codename ‘Yomo’ (more). And many expect further news from Deutsche Bank which just opened up its new Silicon Valley-based Innovation Lab in April 2016 (more).

    Supported is all of this by an evolving national Fintech ecosystem which is now coming together: 

    • Innovation facilitators: A number of players and incubation programs are nurturing innovation all over Germany. Those include the comdirect Start-up GarageFinLab AG, FinLeap, the UniCredit innovation labmain incubator as well as Deutsche Boerse’s brand new Fintech Hub, just to name a few.
    • Sizeable domestic investors: Equally promising, 2016 is seeing the rise of corporate investors such as METRO Group, getting involved in Fintech. New local growth equity funds such as the recently launched Digital+ Partners fund are emerging. They are epitomizing a new generation of German FinTech investors who are able to back larger investment rounds  (more). 
    • Supportive regulatory environment: The German Finance Ministry has just launched its own Fintech forum, the so-called ‘FinCamp‘ as a forum to foster mutual dialogue between various players. The first event in April 2016 was attended by 150 representatives of German FinTech start-ups, and associations, as well as staff members of the Finance Ministry, Deutsche Bundesbank and the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) (more).  
    • Industry collaboration: The conservative German private banking industry association (Bundesverband deutscher Banken) has taken an explicit stand to make Fintech a priority from 2016 onwards (more). While a formal membership is still not up for grabs for Germany’s Fintech companies, a number of them were invited by the BdB to a joint communication forum in April 2016 – a widely noticed move with positive symbolic meaning.
    • Public investment money: Germany’s largest public bank, KfW. launched its first-time €225 co-investment vehicle coparion in March 2016. The ambition is to support German growth companies, explicitly targeting the Fintech segment. The public fund is able to provide risk capital of up to €10m per company (more).

    Taking it all together – in 2016, the ground seems to be prepared for German Fintech to finally take off.

    Reason enough for McKinsey & Company to publish the first major analysis on :

    DOWNLOAD: McKinsey & Company (2016): Challenges and Opportunities for fintech in Germany. How digitization is transforming the country’s financial services sector

    In this whitepaper we analyze the magnitude and some underlying drivers of the Fintech phenomenon in Germany.  The recent momentum should not come as a surprise. Germany is an attractive banking market to tackle. More than 80 million people, a vigorous SME segment (‘Mittelstand’) and world-class corporates have a need for modern banking services. In the corporate banking segment there is still ample opportunity for new disruptive solutions.

    A lot of further potential remains for both Fintech companies and banks if they successfully adapt to this new paradigm. 


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/danieldrummer” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Daniel Drummer“] is Management Consultant at McKinsey & Company and this article was originally published on linkedin.

     
  • user 12:18 am on June 1, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , robo, RoboAdvising, ,   

    Fidelity to Launch Robo-Advising This Summer 

    Investments is launching its digital wealth management tool, a.k.a. -adviser, later , a company spokesman told Bank Innovation today. The new product, Fidelity Go, has been in customer pilot for the past two months, and, based on customer feedback, will be ready to go live soon. It&;s a completely separateRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 3:38 am on May 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , FINRA, , IOSCO, , robo,   

    FCA, IOSCO and FINRA to regulate FinTech and Blockchain 

    In the aftermath of the financial crisis 2007-09, financial regulators across the world implemented tighter controls on the majority of sectors within the financial services industry. One of the reasons for their activism may have been the lot criticism regulators have received for often being ineffective when it mattered most.

    In any case, the onus lying on regulatory bodies to ensure fairness within financial markets is now greater than ever. And one of the lessons learnt over the last eight years or so, regulators are today more alert to the far-reaching implications of the industry.

     

    The booming industry

    Investment in the booming sector tripled to over $ 12bn last year and is expected to hit $ 46bn by 2020. Given such explosive growth, the immediate challenge for regulators is how to keep up with the industry’s development and ensure consumer protection is maintained, particularly when many FinTech sectors, such as peer-to-peer lending, operate outside of the traditional regulatory space for financial services. Indeed, this is the view taken by David Wright, secretary general of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (), the global standards setter for the securities sector which brings together the world’s securities regulators.

    Wright warned in October that regulators across the world need to quickly become au fait with the FinTech revolution, otherwise it will be too difficult to implement reform on areas such as clearing, settlement and collateral management further down the road, once the floodgates have opened. While praising FinTech’s ability to provide credit to small companies, Wright has urged the need to address the possible risks, adding that the IOSCO needs “to get up to speed very, very quickly”.

    The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), a non-governmental regulatory body whose mission is to ensure the successful operation of financial markets, has been one of the most pro-active authorities in responding to FinTech growth. Christopher Woolard, the FCA’s director of strategy and competition, recently outlined three major challenges that regulatory bodies need to consider when facing FinTech:

    1. What do we think about the emergence of ‘-advice’?
    2. What are the benefits and risks of ?
    3. Can help solve some of the problems we face around identifying customers and combatting financial crime in a more frictionless way?

    It has also been just over one year since the FCA launched Project Innovate, an initiative designed to effectively engage with FinTech innovators, and as part of the project, the FCA has also created Innovation Hub which more specifically provides support for innovation in financial services. A team of FCA staff guides FinTech start-ups through the process of regulatory authorisation and then provides support for one year after receiving approval. The FCA will also explore how regulation can continue to be adapted to encourage growth without sacrificing consumer protection.

     

    Regulatory Sandbox

    Most recently, the FCA has emerged with the idea of a ‘regulatory sandbox’, effectively a controlled ‘playground’ environment where UK start-ups who are currently unauthorised to conduct business within the financial services industry can test their new products without having to apply for a full license. The FCA’s chief executive Martin Wheatley has perhaps best described the UK regulatory approach towards FinTech: “Innovation can benefit consumers; whether by reducing hassle, reducing costs, or improving products. So we want to ensure that regulation unlocks these benefits, rather than blocks them”.

    Global regulators also appear to be creating specific institutional initiatives, much like the FCA, to ensure they can work alongside FinTech companies as closely as possible. For example, Malaysia’s Securities Commission launched the Alliance of Fintech Community in September, a project in which the regulator intends to promote the country’s network of FinTech stakeholders, in order to drive growth and innovation. It also seeks to provide regulators with more clarity about the way in which to promote financial innovation responsibly.

    The commission’s chairman Ranjit Ajit Singh believes that the regulator “could play a facilitator’s role in a number of ways – be it by assisting businesses in navigating the regulatory environment, sponsoring accelerator programmes or strengthening the venture capital and private equity ecosystem to provide much-needed financing for FinTech entrepreneurs”.

     

    What is Asia regulating?

    Asian regulators, similarly, are keen to support the development of FinTech during this crucial growth phase. At the World Capital Markets Symposium in September, which brought together regulators from across the region, many policymakers emphasized that they must strike the right balance between promoting innovation and protecting market participants. Liu Jun, head of the Research Centre at the China Securities Regulatory Commission, believes that the Chinese government is adopting “a so-called laid-back approach in dealing with FinTech companies…allowing market forces to do their decision making process”, and adding that “the authorities watch closely but don’t want to intervene the consumer-facing industry”.

    However, the reality is that China’s regulatory authorities have been far from reticent when proposing potential market intermediation. Indeed, the Chinese central bank is currently mulling over whether to impose a cap on online transactions as a way to curb the growth of China’s exploding mobile payments and third-party payments market (which includes notable FinTech firms such as Alibaba).

    For Australian regulators, trust and confidence for the investing public appears to be top of their priority list. John Price, commissioner of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), recently asserted that without the trust and confidence promoted by regulatory bodies, ‘investors, consumers and participants in the financial services sector, including FinTech start-ups, are less likely to participate in it”.

    Indeed, in much of its literature to date, the ASIC has taken a more risk-averse approach to FinTech innovation than a number of its peers in that it appears to determine potential risks to investors first before proceeding with discussions about collaboration.

    On balance, the UK’s FCA appears to be leading the global regulatory discussion on FinTech – undoubtedly due to its status as a hub for both finance and technology, and regardless of the fact that the overwhelming amount of FinTech investment still originates from the US. This means that the position of US regulators on FinTech still carries the most weight from a global perspective. The director of the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Richard Cordray has emphasised the need for the legal and regulatory framework to keep up effectively with FinTech “so that all consumers can be well served and remain protected, whether they are opening their wallet or scanning the screen on their smartphone&;.

    Thomas Curry, the US Comptroller of the Currency (the top regulator for national ) has also recommended that policymakers remain alert, noting that some FinTech innovations &;signify real points of departures that will require a significant amount of scrutiny to ensure that they can be offered safely and soundly, consistent with applicable laws and regulations, and in a way that ensures adequate consumer protections&8221;.

     

    Conclusion

    The cost of regulation and compliance is often one of the biggest hurdles for new FinTech companies to overcome. Therefore, it makes sense that while the industry is in a significant growth phase, the regulatory burden is not so heavy as to unnecessarily choke off innovation. Furthermore, the role the FinTech firms will play in the finance industry, especially in relation to traditional financial institutions, has not yet been ascertained – will they largely be collaborative friends to big banking, or competitive foes? It is probable they will be both; nonetheless, FinTech’s growth has triggered alarm among banks who have voiced concerns that the regulatory playing field is becoming increasingly uneven. Addressing the disparities between the two industries on an international level is likely to be a key area of focus for regulators going forward.

    The post FCA, IOSCO and FINRA to regulate FinTech and Blockchain appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 9:35 am on May 23, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , robo,   

    FinTech is not about disruption. It’s renovation. 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAeeAAAAJDc4MTM1NTU2LTFkZjYtNGIxZi1hYTY0LTRkZmIxOWI3ZmFhZA-2

    2016 is the year of big changes in .

    While VC investments have continued to rise in the first quarter of the year,many question marks are arising on real capacity of FinTech startup to build up enough critical mass and reach a long-term sustainable and scalable business model (see for instance the growing critics to pure web advisors and recent troubles of Lending Club). 

    Is it FinTech wave in trouble? Is it it’s disruption promise already dead?

    My own answer is that those who really thought that FinTech startup could disrupt and replace got it all wrong. Yet, at the same time those from banks who are thinking that resistance will prevail got it all wrong too.

    Banking is going under a major transformation since the arrival of internet. Digital banking, born at the end of last century in many geographies, is a reality and it is here to prove that banks can transform and embrace the digital world providing customers with the expected UX and solutions. There are so many examples, of digital first banks especially in Europe, Poland and Turkey leading the way, where they already enjoy millions of customers. Yet, digital banking is transforming itself and it is getting in to its second phase, converging with FinTech recent developments.

    From one side FinTech startups are starting to collaborate, consolidate, inevitably moving to a more sustainable marketplace banking model (partnering with banks and/or among themselves).

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAkCAAAAJDQ2NWEzZTU4LWNkODktNGQ3Yi05ZGVkLTYxOWYxZjlmMWU4Mg

    On the other end the rise of open API banking and a pro-market regulation (see PSD2) is going to open up the doors also for banks, and especially for digital banks, to a broader, fruitful collaboration  also with FinTech companies. Digital banks are the best positioned to get the most of the second digital phase. New FinTech aggregators will arise too.

    In a nutshell, FinTech development will prove to be the new lifeblood to  digital banking, a second, stronger, broader, faster, stage where collaborations and partnerships will strongly increase (instead of disruption). M&A as well will see a strong hype (albeit not at the exit prices dreamed by investing VC just one year ago)  not just between banks (needed for efficiency and regulatory constraints) but also between FinTech companies and from Banks buying startups.

    This is not disruption, it is banking renovation on the go, thru the very strong impact of the and the customer oriented design brought by FinTech, that will shape up the financial services of the new century, and will transform banking. You may call it FinTech banking or Markeplace banking. 

    FinTech disruption is dead. Long live FinTech.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/robertoferrari” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Roberto Ferrari”] is General Manager CheBanca!, Chairman of the board YellowFunds Sicav. This article was originally published on linkedin.

     
  • user 3:35 am on May 23, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Convinced, Dramatically, , , , , robo, , ,   

    CFA Swiss Fintech Survey: Swiss Bankers Convinced That Fintech Will Dramatically Impact Financial Industry 

     are the most that will the entire services , naming -advisory and as the most impactful innovations, according to a new by CFA Institute.

    CFA Institute Fintech Report 2016Released earlier this month, CFA Institute&;s &;Fintech Survey Report 2016&8217; measures the opinions of the organization&8217;s investment professional members to better understand their sentiment towards the emerging fintech scene.

    According to Christian Dreyer, CFA and CEO of CFA Society Switzerland, the survey results highlight &;the fascination and respect that financial experts have for financial technologies.&;

    &8220;Swiss counterparts are particularly convinced by all things related [to financial technologies],&8221; Dreyer said in a media release.

    Findings suggest that among the current innovations in the financial services industry, robo-advisors are expected to have the biggest impact in both short and long-term.

    Asset management (55%), banking (16%), and securities (12%) are the three sectors that will be the most affected by automated financial advice tools.

    sectors affected by robo advisors CFA institute fintech survey 2016

    70% of participants consider that mass affluent investors will be positively affected by robo-advisors in the form of reduced costs, improved access to advice, and improved product choices. In Switzerland, this figure rises to 80% of respondents.

    That said, respondents also named the biggest risks affiliated with the increase in automated financial advices as technical flaws in the algorithms (46%), mis-selling of financial advice (30%) and privacy and data protection concerns (12%).

    While robo-advisors are considered to be the technology that will have the greatest impact on the industry both 1 year and 5 years from now, blockchain technology is considered as the second technology with the greatest potential future opportunity (and risk) in the medium- to long-term.

    Clearing and settlement, alternative currencies, and commercial banking are the top three areas that are thought to be under greatest impact of blockchain technology.

    greatest impact innovation cfa institute fintech survey 2016

    Crowdfunding and lending marketplaces on the other hand should have short-term impacts on the financial services industry.

    38% of respondents believe that existing crowdfunding and/or peer-to-peer lending marketplaces do not have the right balance between ease of access and investor protection. 53% of them are not sure if such balance is possible.

    As a leader in both financial services and innovation, Switzerland has the potential to become a frontrunner in fintech. That said, not all are convinced that the country is putting enough effort to fulfill its potential.

    In a report released in February, EY argued that Switzerland is lacking governmental support when compared with the likes of London or Singapore.

    In March, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) issued new rulings aimed at reducing obstacles for fintech startups and allowing the industry to flourish.

    The circular allows financial intermediaries to onboard clients by means of online and video transmission and is targeted at digital businesses in particular.

     

    Read CFA Institute&8217;s &8216;Fintech Survey Report 2016&8217;: https://www.cfainstitute.org/Survey/fintech_survey.PDF

     

    Featured image: Graphs and charts with stacks of coins, by S.Dashkevych, via Shutterstock.com.

    The post CFA Swiss Fintech Survey: Swiss Bankers Convinced That Fintech Will Dramatically Impact Financial Industry appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 12:18 am on May 23, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ‘People’s, , , , , robo, , ,   

    Wealth Management Still a ‘People’s Business,’ New Regions Exec Says 

    Digital advisory — a.k.a. advisory — is a trend to “watch closely,” according to Kate Randall Danella, Bank&;s newest head of private . But adoption by the bank is likely years away. It’s a space we are watching closely and having conversations now. We look into howRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 10:54 pm on May 21, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Lexicon, robo,   

    The Alternative Fintech Lexicon 

    shutterstock_294517823

    The Lexicon

    – Accelerators: Where startups go to learn. What they learn is anybody&;s guess. See Decelerators.

    – Alternative Lending: An alternative way to make the same mistakes in lending, over and over again. See Crowdfunding.

    – Anonymity: Required when discussing either financial services executives bonuses or the use of offshore centers when optimizing taxes and ownership structures. Not required when users interact with financial services firms. See Privacy.

    – AML (Anti Money Laundering): A set of procedures, laws and regulations financial services firms occasionally follow and regulators occasionally enforce. See KYC.

    &;  API (Application Programming Interface): A set of routines and protocols Wizards use to develop magical and frictionless interaction between software applications. Alternatively, an acronym Muggles use when pretending to be wizards.

    – API Call: A call muggles make to a private fintech investigator when trying to crack innovation, as in &;I think I I am going to make A Private Investigator Call now as this digital innovation thingie is very tricky.&;

    – Artificial Intelligence (AI): Neither Artificial nor Intelligent. A major vector for future unemployment in the financial services industry.

    – Augmented Reality (AR): Where the sex industry and the financial services industry will eventually meet.

    – Big Data: Applied to most data analytics projects to produce negative returns.

    : A Numismatist&8217;s worst nightmare.

    – Bitcoin : A group of digital prisoners, chained to one another, and bound to perform menial digital tasks recorded on a digital ledger in return for the promise of a better future life.

     &8211; Brick and Mortar: A Financial Services Incumbent&8217;s Alzheimer&8217;s moment.

    – Cards: Credit, Debit, Reloadable, Gift. The most profitable scam in the history of the financial services industry.

    – Card Not Present / Card Present (CNP/CP): Arcane revenue producing schemes for the payment industry.

    – Checking Account: Soon to be yesterday&8217;s money machine.

    – Conferences (Fintech): Gathering places where thought leaders pretend to educate, startups pretend to pitch, corporates pretend to care, venture investors pretend to scout for investments. Contrary to popular belief, pizza is not served freely at conferences. See Hackathons.

    – Consensus Ledgers: Free range Blockchains. Also, for the accountants in the audience, not a ledger. See Bitcoin Blockchain, Ethereum.

    – Consensus Machines: Free range Consensus Ledgers, bred with organic Turing corn.

    – Core Systems: The tools with which service providers keep , insurance companies, asset managers hostages.

    – Corporate Venture Capital (CVC): The art of pretending superior investing will occur when informed by corporate fiat. Alternatively, the science of Fin over Tech. See Venture Capital (VC).

    – Crowdfunding: Applies to either equity or lending. The art of pretending it takes a crowd to finance stuff. See Alternative Lending and Equity Crowdfunding.

    : A currency which adheres or belongs secretly to a party, sect, or other group.

    – Customers: The one thing most fintech startups are still looking for. See Traction.

    – Decelerators: Where startups go when they move too fast. See Accelerators.

    – Digital: Related to the storing of information as either a 0 or a 1. Example of a 0: &8220;Soon we will have zero brick and mortar branches&8221;. Example of a 1: &8220;Banking executives compensation is again approaching 100% increases.&8221;

    – Digital Banker/Insurer/Asset Manager: Tomorrow&8217;s endangered species.

    – Disintermediation: The act of creating another overlord as in &8220;My API will rule over your API.&8221; See API.

    – EMV (EuroPay, MasterCard, Visa): A technical standard built to promote online fraud.

    – Entrepreneur: Central protagonist in ancient Greek tragedies or comedies involving the critique of money. Alternatively, a post Marxist practitioner. See Startup.

    – Equity Crowdfunding: Platforms that may provide much work for litigation lawyers in the future.

    – Ethereum: A public blockchain platform which promises to free digital prisoners shackled to other public blockchains. See Bitcoin Blockchain.

    – Ethics: An extraordinary expense that appears below the EBITDA line both in GAAP and IFRS.

    – Financial Inclusion: An issue solved by according to blockchain enthusiasts. A profitability issue according to financial services incumbents. A game changer according to social impact investors.

    – Fintech: Neither &8220;Fin&8221; nor &8220;Tech&8221;. Modern day alchemical process.

    – Fraud: The act of defining loose operations control in order to elicit fraudulent activities which will eventually be billed at cost plus to the end user. In the payments industry, the tradeoff between convenience and privacy.

    – Free: A new &8220;source of revenue&8221; paradigm, e.g. free trading, free investing, free payments. To be noted, free fraud is not yet recognized as a new source of revenue.

    – Gateway: A purgatory software interface where payments transit before reaching heaven.

    – Governance (in Fintech): What often lies beyond the wall.

    – Hackathons: Events that bring fintech developers, designers, corporate executives and innovation managers together around pizza. Hackathons organized around the summer solstice are sought-after events, as it is believed pizza tastes better during that period of the year.

    – Hash: Non-edible but still intriguing recipe comprising mathematical algorithms that map data of arbitrary size to data of fixed size. Frequently used in the Insurance industry as exemplified by the old saying &8220;The actuary made a hash of the life expectancy of millennials.&8221;

    – Incubators: Where corporations are able to smother good fintech ideas to death.

    – Innovation: What VCs overpay for. What corporations are seldom capable of delivering. What only a few startups can deliver.

    – Insurtech: Ego booster term crafted for the Insurance industry. See Fintech.

    – Interchange Fee: Soon to become a land far far away, especially in the US.

    – Interest Rate(s): A conceptual think piece for most fintech startups. Baudrillard&8217;s famous tirade comes to mind when addressing the Sorbonne in 1968, &8220;If interest rates were so important we would have used the term FinInt or IntTech, not Fintech.&8221;

    – Jinn: Spirit capable of appearing in human or animal form and influencing VC investors, corporations and startups alike via consulting analysis, recommendations, white papers. See White Papers.

    – Joy: What fintech startups seldom experience. Referred to in the context of an Initial Public Offering (IPO).

    – Know Your Customer (KYC): The process whereby a business weighs the cost of verifying a client&8217;s identity against the profitability of said client. For a fintech startup, that which will be developed and financed when the sooner of a cease and desist letter from a regulator is received or a $ 100 million funding round is closed, maybe. See AML.

    – Lead Generation: A poor man&8217;s version of revenue building.

    – License(s): Put or Call Options that give a regulator the right but not the obligation to levy fines in the future based on real or perceived violations of the terms of the license granted.

    – Menagerie: Pack of Thought Leaders focused on cornering the market for social media power ranking and industry top lists via &8220;elaborate&8221; insider trading techniques. See Thought Leader.

    – Millenials: What fintech startups say they focus on and financial services incumbents know they have no clue about. See Customers.

    – Mobile Wallet: Darwinian evolution of a checking account. That which will generate revenue, but not necessarily to financial services incumbents.

    – Near Prime Credit: A set of customers who are sub prime but for marketing purposes are labelled near prime as copywriting and creativity is important in the lending industry. See Sub Prime.

    – Net Interest Rate Margin (NIM): The wet dream bankers and insurers dream every time they sleep.

    – Network effect(s): Often talked about, seldom witnessed in the financial services industry.

    – Non Performing Loans: According to alternative lenders, crowd lenders, p2p lenders, marketplace lenders, a mathematical impossibility.

    – Non Traditional Data Sets: Data sets you would not want your mother to know about, let alone look at.

    – Omnibus Account: A money-carrying vehicle, originally horse-drawn. Most bank-operated omnibus accounts are allegedly still operated manually and horse-drawn.

    – P2P: A business model that allows people or entities that have nothing in common to do business with one another. From the word &8220;peer&8221; which means &8220;complete stranger&8221;.

    – Payday Lending: The act of producing indentured servitude.

    – Paying Customer: The rarest of species, seldom observed in the wild by startups.

    – Payments: Payments come in two varieties. The &8220;slow&8221; variety which refers to the medical condition whereby financial services incumbents produce revenue via the sloth-like pace of provisioning of payments. The &8220;fast&8221; variety which refers to a simple technology feat which most financial services firms pretend is impossible to achieve.

    – Payment Network(s): Money printing machines.

    – Personal Financial Management (PFM): Movement originally triggered by the wealth transfer mechanism that occurred between Intuit shareholders (buyers) and Mint shareholders (sellers).

    – Platform(s): The shoes many incumbents want to wear.

    – Prime Credit: A set of customers lenders desperately would like to lend to but never do as these customers seldom need credit. See Near Prime.

    – Privacy: What is enforced after weighing the cost of breach and compliance against executives bonuses as in &8220;We only had to pay $ 10 million fine for the latest data breach&8221;. See Anonymity.

    – Proof of Work: An emerging contributor to global warming.

    – Quantum Computing: That which will render many things and many people redundant.

    – Rails (Payment): Train tracks over which steam locomotives shuffle back and forth wagons chock full of payments.

    – RegTech: Because regulators should have their tech too. Alternatively, because why not.

    – Regulator(s): Satan and his minions, unless they use technology. See RegTech, White Walkers.

    Advisors: Not a robot. Not a financial advisor. Fancy term for a digital channel.

    – Scaling: The ability to gain traction in unique ways in fintech, e.g. &8220;Startup bankruptcies tend to scale well.&8221;, &8220;NPLs scale with ease in a down credit cycle.&8221;

    – Smart Contract: Neither smart, nor a contract. For a blockchain developer, nirvana. For a lawyer, anathema. It is believed that through selected breeding a new specie of lawyer/developers will be created thereby enabling the wide adoption of smart contracts.

    – Spice: A highly addictive Melange which fintech celebrities &8211; VCs, entrepreneurs &8211; consume daily and heightens their awareness and prescient abilities. Repeated exposure to &8220;Up&8221; Spice mutates fintech celebrities bodies into virtual social media avatars. Repeated exposure to &8220;Down&8221; Spice is deadly.

    – Startup (Fintech): Ancient Greek play. Can either be a tragedy or a comedy. Focused on exploring and expanding upon a post Marxist critique of money. See Entrepreneur.

    – Sub Prime: A set of customers that even copywriting cannot disguise and that, with the help of advanced data analytics, will yield positive returns, up to a breaking point. See Big Data.

    – Token(s):  Reduces fraud, makes EMV obsolete, helps with authentication and authorization of transactions in the payments industry. In other words, a really cool and useful thing which explains why it is so darn difficult to adopt industry wide.

    – Traction: The startup science of demonstrating progress in the absence of Customers. See Customers.

    – Thought Leader: Rhetorician who occasionally attends conferences for the pizza, not realizing hackathons are where the dough is. See Menagerie, Conferences and Hackathons.

    – Uberization: An event that simultaneously holds the lowest probability of occurrence and the highest probability of utterance in fintech.

    – Underbanked: A universe of people and businesses that refuse to comply with traditional profitability measures as defined by financial services incumbents.

    – Unicorn: Animal hunted for its skin by rational investors. Alternatively, animal bred for its magical properties by irrational investors.

    – Valuation: A +/- rounding error. Also, one of the key ingredient of Spice. See Spice.

    – Venture Capital: The art of pretending superior investing will occur when informed by market fiat. Alternatively, the science of Tech over Fin. See Corporate Venture Capital (CVC).

    – Veteran: Old hand operator with minimum 30 years experience in the financial technology industry and minimum 4 credit or business cycles under his/her belt. There are few veterans in activity. The only credible actors to be equally efficient and effective at either of fintech investing, fintech startup building, fintech innovation. One can recognize a veteran based on his/her use of profane language and colorful views on his contemporaries.

    – Wallet: What any participant in the industry wants to &8220;share&8221;, as long as it is not theirs, as in &8220;Our share of the customer wallet is important for our future health.&8221;

    – White Papers: Exercise in casuistry.

    – White Walkers: Government officials who hold the power to resurrect dead banks but not yet the power to resurrect fintech startups to the dismay of VC investors.

    – Xanadu: An idyllic place otherwise known as the Silicon Valley. &8220;In Xanadu did the great VC Khan / A stately pleasure dome decree&8221; is a alternative copycat poem published in the 19th century describing fintech venture investing and venture eco systems.

    – Yield: See Interest Rate(s).

    – Zelig: Describes the act of mimicking the fintech activities of leaders, as in a &8220;me too&8221; fintech VC or a &8220;me too&8221; startup. For example &8220;This fintech venture fund is so zelig!&8221;

    FiniCulture

     
  • user 3:35 pm on May 21, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Courses, Education, , , robo, , , University, Workshops   

    Fintech and Blockchain Education: University Courses and Workshops in Switzerland and Germany 

    The vibrant ecosystem is evolving rapidly and the sector is in increasing need for professionals with skills and knowledge on the new, emerging business models, digital platforms and tools that are gaining popularity.

    To educate students and professionals on FinTech, and have a number of programs available that dive into digitalization in the banking and financial sector, , the emerging FinTech startup scene, and many other topics.

    Here is a few of them:

    Hochschule Luzern: CAS Digital Banking

    Hochschule Luzern fintech program courses

    The Certificate of Advanced Studies (CAS) in Digital Banking of Hochschule Luzern is a program aimed at providing students with professional skills and knowledge on the emerging FinTech ecosystem, teach them about the ongoing digitalization of the financial services industry, and the ability to use these new trends to grab new business opportunities.

    The program is divided into four main : the environment of digital banking, strategic digital banking, digital customer management and social banking, and FinTech products and solutions.

     

    HWZ Hochschule für Wirtschaft Zürich: CAS Digital Finance

    hochschule fur wirtschaft zurich fintech course

    The CAS Digital Finance of the of Applied Sciences in Business Administration in Zurich, is a 18-day course targeted at financial services professionals.

    The program is divided into four major blocks:

    • Digital mindset: innovation management, cultural changes, digitalization as part of the overall strategy, etc.
    • Digital products and services: fintech, crowdfunding/lending, peer-to-peer, -advisor, etc.
    • Technology: big-data analysis, cyber security, blockchain technology, etc.
    • Customer experience: multichannel presence, online/offline strategies, community, social media, etc.

     

    Frankfurt School of Finance and Management

    Frankfurt School of Finance and Management fintech course

    As part of its bachelor&;s degree in business administration, the Frankfurt School of Finance and Management is proposing a specialization called &;Digital Innovation and FinTech&; which focuses on the impact of technology and new business models and services on the banking and financial services industry.

    The program will begin in the winter semester of 2016/2017, and as part of the launch of the new specialization, the university has teamed up with FinTech Group, which will support 20 students with their tuition fees. The company will also offer the three year&8217;s best students an employment contract.

     

    Introduction to Blockchains and smart contracts for developers

    introduction to blockchain and smart contracts for developers ValidityLabs fintech courseZurich-based ValidityLabs is a company that provides blockchain and smart contracts through courses and .

    On May 21, 2016, ValidityLabs will be hosting a workshop at Zurich&8217;s Technopark,

    The workshop will be focused on Ethereum and is aimed at familiarizing developers, software architects and technical decision markets with principles of blockchains and smart contracts.

    The workshop will feature a demonstration of a contract deployment and inspection on the Ethereum network.

    Source: information and images from the mentioned universities&8217;/organizations&8217; wites

     

    The post Fintech and Blockchain Education: University Courses and Workshops in Switzerland and Germany appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 7:00 pm on May 14, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , robo,   

    Blockchain is a disruption we simply have to embrace 

    By Alex Tapscott with Don Tapscott, co-authors, Revolution

    The likely to have the greatest impact on the financial services industry and the world of business has arrived. Not peer-to-peer lending, artificial intelligence, big data, -advisers or Apple Pay – I’m talking about the blockchain, the technology behind digital currencies such as . Blockchain represents nothing less than the second generation of the Internet, and it holds the potential to profoundly transform the financial services industry.

    Because the first generation of the Internet was built for moving and storing information, not value, it has done little to change how we do business or access financial services. When you send someone information, you’re really sending a copy, not the original. It’s okay to have a printing press for information – but not for money.

    As a result, we rely on powerful intermediaries, such as , to establish trust. Today’s financial intermediaries also perform eight important functions in business and society: authenticating identity and reputation, moving value, storing value, lending and borrowing, exchanging value, funding and investing, insurance and risk management, and audit and tax. We call these the “golden eight,” and they will all be transformed through blockchain.

    Over all, these intermediaries do an okay job, but with limitations. They use centralized servers, which can be hacked. They take fees. They capture our data. They run on outmoded technology. Regulations are antiquated. These intermediaries also exclude two billion unbanked people who can’t prove identity or don’t have enough money to justify a bank account. In sum, intermediaries capture a lopsided share of the benefits of the digital economy, just as they did in the predigital economy.

    Enter blockchain, a vast, global and distributed ledger running on millions of devices and open to anyone, where not just information but anything ofvalue – money, equities, bonds and other financial assets, titles, deeds, music, art, scientific discoveries, intellectual property, even votes – can be moved and stored securely and privately, and where trust is established not by powerful intermediaries but through mass collaboration and clever code.

    If the Internet was the first native digital format for information, then blockchain is the first native digital format for value – a new medium for money. It acts as ledger of accounts, database, notary, sentry and clearing house, all by consensus. And it holds the potential to make financial markets radically more efficient, secure, inclusive and transparent.

    Blockchain entrepreneurs and incumbents alike are working to devise new ways to perform the eight core functions of financial intermediaries through blockchain technology.

    Authentication of identity and reputation

    Today, we rely on rating agencies, analytics firms and banks to establish trust, verify identity in transactions and decide who merits access to the system. In contrast, reputation accrues on the blockchain itself. Blockchain technology lowers or eliminates the need for trust altogether.

    Moving and storing value

    Blockchain startups such as Circle, Abra and Paycase want to make retail banking a global free commodity, like Google, and can do so because their back end, supported by blockchain, is secure and inexpensive to run. “When was the last time you sent a ‘cross-border e-mail’?” asked Jeremy Allaire, CEO of Circle, rhetorically. He bets hundreds of millions of millennials globally will find this prospect appealing.

    Lending

    Retail, commercial and mercantile banks, along with credit scoring and rating firms, facilitate the issuance of credit card debt, mortgages, corporate and municipal bonds, T-bills and asset-backed securities. On the blockchain, anyone could check creditworthiness before issuing, trading and settling traditional debt instruments directly, reducing friction and increasing transparency. The unbanked and entrepreneurs everywhere could access loans from peers.

     Exchanging value

    Market-making will change profoundly as financial assets move from a paper-based format to a native digital format based on blockchain. Settlement times on transactions can be reduced from days or weeks to minutes or seconds. This is a huge opportunity for incumbents to reduce cost, but it also poses risks.

     Venture capital, IPOs and project finance

    The halcyon days of entrepreneurship may be upon us. Ethereum, a blockchain platform supported by Microsoft, Manulife, Deloitte and others, got its start as a “blockchain IPO” – issuing native tokens for bitcoins. No need for bankers, lawyers, auditors and stock exchanges. Today, it’s worth $1-billion (U.S.). Blockchain also automates the matchmaking, enabling more efficient, transparent, secure models for peer-to-peer financing, recording dividends and paying coupons.

     Insurance and risk management

    Using reputation systems based on a person’s economic and social capital, insurers will be able to make better-informed decisions, which explains why Manulife just announced a flagship agreement with blockchain developer Consensus Systems. The over-the-counter derivatives market, with a notional value of $600-trillion, is paper-based and opaque and relies too heavily on centralized clearinghouses. Moving all derivatives to blockchain would reduce counterparty and systemic risk in the financial system.

     Accounting

    Traditional accounting practices are not keeping pace with the velocity and complexity of modern finance. The blockchain’s distributed ledger will make auditing transparent through time-stamped third entries on a blockchain, enabling regulators to more easily scrutinize financial actions within a corporation in real time. Deloitte, PWC and others are investigating these “triple-entry” accounting schemes for their audit practices.

    Given the promise and peril, Wall Street has woken up in a big way. More than 45 leading banks, including Royal Bank of Canada , have joined the R3CEV Consortium to develop blockchain infrastructure for banking. IBM launched the Hyperledger project, which counts Deutsche Bank, the London Stock Exchange Group and Wells Fargo as members. Microsoft is in the game, as are Visa, Cisco, Intel and many other leading tech companies.

    Venture capitalists are piling in, too. In 2014 and 2015 alone, more than $1-billion of venture capital flooded into the emerging ecosystem, and the rate of investment is doubling annually.

    “We’re quite confident,” said Marc Andreessen, an Internet icon and venture capitalist, “that when we’re sitting here in 20 years, we’ll be talking about blockchain the way we talk about the Internet today.”

    Governments believe blockchain could simplify and improve the delivery of services and empower regulators and central bankers to do their jobs more effectively.

    So is this the death knell for financial services or a new platform for reinvention? For sure, blockchain will create winners and losers. Banks can thrive if they can steer clear of the innovator’s dilemma and disrupt from within. Leaders of the old rarely embrace the new, but we remain hopeful.

    The greatest opportunity for Canada is to use blockchain to kick-start our innovation economy by embracing the entrepreneurs who are instigating change.

    Canadian entrepreneurs have been on the leading edge of blockchain innovation from the beginning. Ethereum, mentioned earlier, was founded by a group of Canadian developers, led by Vitalik Buterin. It recently became the first crowd-funded blockchain “unicorn.” Consensus Systems, run by Canadian CEO Joseph Lubin, is a blockchain juggernaut, building applications to reinvent a dozen industries. And a growing constellation of entrepreneurs and technologists are trying to build the future at companies such as Ledger Labs, Paycase, Unocoin and Blockstream.

    Can we nurture an environment where entrepreneurs and their ideas can flourish? There is a critical mass of talent in Canada right now. What’s needed is bold, multistakeholder leadership. The unstoppable force of blockchain technology is barrelling down on the immovable infrastructure of modern finance. We would like this collision to transform the old money machine into a prosperity platform for all.

     


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/dontapscott” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Alex Tapscott”] is CEO and founder of Northwest Passage Ventures, an advisory firm building industry-leading blockchain businesses.

    This piece is adapted from his book, with co-author Don Tapscott, Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business and the World. A version of this article originally appeared on TheGlobeandMail.com

     
  • user 7:10 pm on May 2, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Promising, , robo, ,   

    Top 20 Most Promising Banking Technology Solution Providers 2016 

    Nexright driving & innovation leveraging API Economy

    The millennials will soon constitute up to half the global workforce by 2020 and it is only natural for public serving organizations like to pay heed to their concerns. Banking–according to a study by Viacom, a media network–faces the highest risk of disruption.

    Leaders of banking managements are often weighed down by the gravity of having to serve their customers, with mass transactions, at the same time, offering personalized content to their banking needs.

    Unlike banks that are born digital, traditional banks cannot afford the luxury of starting with a clean slate, and they must build the newfangled architecture on top of the legacy foundation. In an effort to ease down the process of transformation, Nexright bids a continuous-delivery approach of new functionalities.

    “We have developed an API management for banks that allows digital innovation running alongside the slow-speed, transaction focused legacy systems,” explains Dilip Mohapatra, Director, Nexright.

    Nexright’s solution provides for a digital customer ecosystem with digital customers–complementing and enhancing existing capabilities to collect, analyze, and utilize financial data. The Melbourne, Australia headquartered banking solution provider allows CIOs of banks to redefine banking and drive innovation, leveraging digital data and API as core foundation.

    “Application Programming Interface (API) is the secret sauce of the digital economy that allows banks to open up banking services and data via APIs,
    and offer a broader range of products and services to their customers,” Mohapatra adds. Holding their steadfast campaigns towards unravelling the concept of contextual banking via data analytics, Nexright channels harmless, but prospective banking information to invoke potential banking businesses through secure pluggable interfaces–APIs.

    For instance, a mortgage API holds relevant mortgage data as assets and the points of interest and impact for banks.

    Nexright’s banking product, which is essentially a set of simplified service and API models, allows transformation of banks in core banking and
    digital banking in parallel. Some of these solutions leverage banking industry standards like IBM IFW (Information FrameWork). Mohapatra cites an example of Nexright assisting one of Australia’s topmost banks in establishing an API center of Excellence to fuel the API economy and drive digital disruption. Through IBM IFW and BIAN, the provider created a modern platform based on open architecture with integration and straight-through processing capabilities.

    “Application Programming Interface (API) is the secret sauce of the digital economy that allows banks to open up banking services and data via APIs”

    On top of that, Nexright also has a dedicated wealth management practice, providing Fintech (financial ) strategy and solutions to banks. For example, it includes client engagement platform and adviser support tools addressing cashflow management, long-term financial support services, and scalable advisory solutions to simplify existing complex advisory process.

    “The Fintech strategy essentially allows banks to expand their existing banking products into various fintech areas e.g. financial advisory services into -advisory,” states Mohapatra.

    With a consulting team that comprises of both banking and technology domain experts, Nexright stays ahead of peers in the banking arena, by thrusting itself forward in the direction of business strategy and outcomes rather than just getting the technical infrastructure in place.

    By entrusting their success on their customer’s success, Mohapatra points out, “Nexright assigns a Customer Program Success Manager (CPSM), which once the program is live, assesses the customer’s achievement against expected levels.”

    Nexright’s innovation lab functions as an idea incubator and accelerator, where there is a constant endeavor to develop newer products and better services and solutions, collaborating with customers, partners, and industry experts.

    With his rich experience in product development and consulting services across several multinational IT and consulting firms, Mohapatra drives Nexright’s growth globally and is very passionate and committed in making a substantial difference in customer’s business. “Considering banking and Fintech demand for API, integration and cloud services, Nexright is investing further in open banking and Fintech initiatives,” assures Mohapatra.

    Author john steward is the Senior Technical Consultant of Nexright, Australia

    Find More Fintech Articles

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami