Tagged: payments Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 3:35 pm on July 23, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , broader, , , , payments, signaling,   

    Payments: The first key battlefield signaling broader change in US banking 

    Fueled by innovation, the US market is undergoing tectonic shifts. Many players are looking to as a crucial for . Incumbents— and established fintechs, such as networks and card processors—have transformed the transactions environment over decades for the benefit of end users. New generations of players, both partners and competitors, have used digital business models to enhance the customer experience and open the door to new segments and revenue sources. Now, with the growing influence of Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook and other similar big (bigtech) firms, along with increasing customer sophistication and ongoing overseas disruption, the fundamental aspects of revenue drivers and share are in question.

    The storm beneath the surface

    Accenture examined potential trajectories of current trends, which could present revenue challenges for US banks in payments. Our analysis indicates that incremental revenues are projected to accrue primarily to non-banks over the next few years. The beneficiaries include players already in the value chain (those less exposed to customer demands, such as rewards, and with more direct access to key platform levers, like processing) and new forms of fintech, bigtech and other third parties phasing into the market.

    Figure 1: US payments revenue ($ BN)
    Source: Accenture research and analysis

    US disruption is anticipated to differ from that faced in Asia, Europe or other markets where the external impetus—competitive or regulatory—is accelerated and often direct. At least initially, established players may be situated to benefit financially; as evidenced by ApplePay, it can take years for new, disruptive platforms to scale. For those who are unprepared, gradual pricing pressure and value leakage may begin to erode many existing business models.

    Open to change

    Of course, a wide range of scenarios are possible for the future of US payments with several factors much than payments (including artificial intelligence, , cross-border transactions, major geopolitical movements, Open Banking, privacy, regulation and security) at play. Recognizing the range of potential outcomes, US payments players have the ability to position themselves for success.

    Incumbents have already begun moving to protect their revenue base by introducing innovative solutions, such as Zelle. Going forward, technology deployment needs to happen faster with more agile adoption and monetization of technologies, such as data analytics, blockchain, and AI/machine learning, that can rewrite the payments equation. These new technologies offer a pathway to optimize the go-to-market model, breaking down silos to improve revenue and efficiencies internally and value chain orchestration externally.

    Banks and other payments players can increase relevance by focusing on the customer journey and use cases to add value. Amazon Go, a new kind of technology-based retail store from Amazon, is just one example of looking in and beyond the existing value chain to rethink the customer experience. If incumbents view the customer as the North Star and are open to all that is possible, then they, too, can be disruptors, instead of the disrupted.

    Change can be challenging. However, payments players are in the fortunate position to be able to write their own story. Now is the time to do so.

    I invite you to read our report, Driving the Future of Payments

    Special thanks to Tom Skomba, who contributed to this blog.

    The post Payments: The first key battlefield signaling broader change in US banking appeared on Accenture Banking Blog.

    Accenture Banking Blog

     
  • user 3:35 am on July 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , payments,   

    Brexit impact on payments 

    On March 29, 2017, Britain decided to leave the European Union (EU) and invoked Article 50—following the referendum held on June 23, 2016, in which 51.9 percent of the participating UK electorate voted to leave the EU. Though the UK will officially leave the EU by March 29, 2019, followed by a transition period of 21 months, the exit decision itself triggered exchange rates so volatile that it became difficult for businesses to maintain clear visibility on their international transfers. will eventually have an on business, payment service providers, and consumers—but it will largely depend on how the UK’s future trading relationship is going to be with the EU.

    In the absence of clarity of the eventual shape of Brexit, certain financial institutions are planning for the “hard” Brexit scenario and making decisions about locations, hiring and changes. From a  perspective, are reviewing their solutions across Liquidity (notional pooling, cash concentration), payments (SCT, SDD, high-value payments, FX), cash management services (virtual accounts, receivables management) and Euro-denominated products to continue to operate across borders.

    Post the transition period, the UK might also lose direct access to Euro Clearing & Settlement Mechanisms (CSMs) such as TARGET2, EBA EURO1 and EBA STEP2. UK banks may need to build Euro-clearing propositions in Europe to handle affiliates and third party/correspondent bank high-value clearing, which would involve rerouting transactions, indirect memberships via Europe branches, Nostro setups, reviewing charging models, etc.

    Non-EU financial institutions will not be able to use their UK branches to pay and collect funds after Brexit takes place, and would need to consider transferring SEPA access sponsorship from the UK to European branches. However, if they remain part of the European Economic Area (EEA) and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), they can continue to take advantage of SEPA.

    Acquiring players may have to move their headquarters to other European markets and take new contracts to operate in the EU. Split of acquiring entities means a significant overhead by splitting scheme submissions across multiple BINs. Card machine providers would need to reclassify their machines as international or inter-regional so that customers and merchants are aware of all the changes while making card payments. The interchange classification of the UK will significantly affect merchant pricing with open questions such as the UK’s registration as part of the EEA post Brexit having significant impact on interchange base costs. Also, unknown regulatory position post Brexit on key issues such as interchange caps and card surcharges.

    PSD2 is applicable to UK banks since it came into effect in January 2018. Banks have already spent more than GBP750 million in preparation for the regulation, but once UK has officially left the EU, the UK Open Banking initiative is more likely to replace PSD2 and potentially have limited impact on a practical level.

    The UK startup ecosystem massively supported the “Remain&; vote as it provides them easy access to the Single Market, which is an important asset for startups’ business development potential. Now, they are quickly adapting to the fast-changing environment—and developing cross-border business is anyway part of the tech entrepreneur’s DNA.

    While negotiating exit from the EU, it is important from a payments perspective that there is no detriment for customers or businesses, and that the UK economy continues to operate smoothly. Without any solid evidence on the changes to current legislation, firms need to ensure that compliance and change teams are on the front foot to meet the requirements of the new ecosystem.

    The post Brexit impact on payments appeared first on Accenture Banking Blog.

    Accenture Banking Blog

     
  • user 12:19 pm on June 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , payments, ,   

    Support for Realtime Payments Increases Among Banks 

    PREMIUM &; More U.S. are awaking to the idea that supporting (RTP) could add value not just to their customers, but to their revenues. A new report titled &;2018 Global Payments Insight Survey: Cross-Vertical,” from ACI Worldwide and Ovum released today shows that 86% of banks expect to see improvements in their [&;]
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 12:19 am on June 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , payments,   

    PayPal Makes a Grab for Marketplace Payments with Hyperwallet Acquisition 

    made a strong move into the group space with the announcement it will purchase for $ 400 million. The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter. Hyperwallet allows for businesses such as Etsy, eBay or Uber to easily make disbursements to multiple merchants or drivers, even across international borders. The company [&;]
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 12:18 pm on June 8, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Blame, Complexity, Dwolla’s, , Lampe, , payments, , , , ,   

    Fintech Unfiltered: Blame Market Complexity for Slow Adoption of Realtime Payments, Dwolla’s Lampe Says [PODCAST] 

    (RTP) is great for the consumer, but what about for the ? Will realtime payments lead banks to lost revenue on transfer fees or fines from bounced checks? That is likely. But real-time payments will also open doors to new revenues possibilities, thanks to data from realtime transactions. “What we’re really talking about is [&;]
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 10:53 pm on June 5, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , CitiConnect, , payments, , ,   

    CitiConnect APIs Support Real-Time E-Commerce Payments 

    ‘s new business models in e-commerce with 24×7 payment operations.
    Financial Technology

     
  • user 3:35 am on June 4, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , payments,   

    CHANGING THE GAME: Integrated payments in acquiring 

    Guest blogger Marc Abbey discusses why addressing competitive implications of is a priority.

    The explosion of software at the point of sale (POS) is a major force of change in today. This trend is not new, but its speed and scope are. Addressing the competitive implications of integrated payments is now a priority concern for acquirers. Understandably so.

    The issue: Disruption from developers

    Software is migrating down market into smaller merchants. It performs various business functions for merchants and is replacing traditional terminals and PC-based solutions. Increasingly, these solutions are integrating payments and capturing the economics of payment acceptance.

    The merchant market is characterized by industry verticals with niche business needs and specialized accounting processes. For example, health and fitness companies can handle scheduling, e-commerce, membership collections, and on-premise payments through the business solutions available to the vertical. And not-for-profits can integrate donor management, events, fundraising campaigns, and e-commerce. Also, faith-based organizations can take recurring payments and payments through e-commerce websites and kiosks. All of this is possible because of these business solutions.

    By streamlining business operations through a single application and creating new user experiences for merchants and their customers, software developers are filling gaps that traditional acquirers are not. With payments now central to developers’ businesses, delivering payments functionality is not just a nice-to-have for them.

    In fact, software developers are realizing that payments is where the real economic value lies. In many cases, they can double their revenue as a result, according to Accenture estimates. Developers can achieve this revenue growth through different approaches. These include referring merchants to traditional acquirers or becoming ISOs or payment facilitators that are more centrally involved in payments processing. Private equity firms are often agents of change here. They are targeting developers before monetization of payments, leading them through the process, and exiting on the strength of the improved economics.

    A look at the software mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market reveals how common this approach is among private equity firms. The market has about 500 to 600 deals per quarter, many are payments focused.1 Some 30 to 40 percent of these transactions have been completed by private equity firms or their portfolio companies in recent quarters.2 In addition, more than half of companies being purchased are in dynamic acceptance verticals like healthcare, education, hospitality and real estate.3

    The impact: A catch-22 for acquirers

    These changes are creating new competitive dynamics for traditional acquirers. Software developers are emerging both as a new distribution channel for acquirers and as a new and formidable category of competitors.

    Most acquirers recognize the complexity of this friend-and-foe relationship. In response, many are investing to create integration environments hospitable to software developers to attract these new referral sources. Sometimes, this investment involves pursuing acquisitions to add capabilities. Accenture estimates that in the past three years, there has been more than $ 6 billion in acquisitions with an integrated payments business thesis.4

    The new normal: Unchartered territory for all

    To keep pace, traditional acquirers must take stock of what all this means to the future of integrated payments. Here is what the landscape will likely look like:

    Old rules getting broken

    As software developers set the new rules of acquiring, there will be more share shifts between traditional and -enabled channels. Already, growth in the independent software vendor channel (35 percent) is outpacing growth in the overall acquiring industry (8 percent), according to Accenture estimates.5

    Rise of the gatekeepers

    The road to acceptance product enablement will increasingly run through software at the POS. This results in a powerful gatekeeper role for software developers. Just like they did for near field communication and Apple Pay, acquirers must prepare to modify their solutions for the next generation of acceptance products.

    Next-gen sales and marketing

    Sales and marketing will never be the same with developers in the value chain. While acquirers have long relied on third-party sales partners, the dynamics will be different with developers in the mix. Acquirers should start to prepare for non-traditional sales partnerships with developers.

    Beating them by joining them

    Acquirers will become developers in key verticals, either through building internal software innovation capabilities or through M&A activity. Vantiv Inc.’s acquisition of Paymetric and Global Payment’s acquisition of Active Networks are among several examples of this trend.

    A critical decision

    Software developers have the ambition and ability to capture a good share of the payments acceptance business. Traditional acquirers must act to avoid disintermediation, and software developers that have yet to get involved are missing significant revenue potential.

    This is a fight-or-flight moment that calls to mind e-commerce in 1995. At the time, an emerging business model was taking off. There were a few dominant players and a handful of specialized players. But many acquirers stood still. There is every indication that integrated payments will evolve on a similar trajectory. Now is the time for acquirers to lean into the growth.

    1 Software Equity Group, “SEG Snapshot: 3Q17 SaaS M&A Update,” October 20, 2017, retrieved on April 3, 2018
    2 Ibid
    3 Ibid
    4 Accenture Payments research conducted March 2018
    5 Ibid

    Marc Abbey, Managing Director, Payments

     

     

     

     

    The post CHANGING THE GAME: Integrated payments in acquiring appeared first on Accenture Banking Blog.

    Accenture Banking Blog

     
  • user 3:35 pm on June 2, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , payments, ,   

    Will PSD2 APIs and instant payments change the game in European payments? 

    The EU’s Second Payment Services Directive ()—and the Banking Authority’s related Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) and Secure Open Standards of Communication—represent a turning point for existing business models in in Europe. PSD2 and RTS open up ’ systems to third-party payments services providers (TPPs) for account information, payment initiation and confirmation of funds via an access interface such as application programming interfaces ().

    The final RTS published on 13 March 2018 specifies only the technical framework conditions and not interface standards. To help fill this gap, the Berlin Group—consisting of almost 40 banks, associations and PSPs from across the EU—has defined a common API framework called &;NextGenPSD2&; (current version 1.1) for the use cases specified in PSD2.

    The major impacts in this context include:

    Payment initiation opens up: For payment initiation, the NextGenPSD2 framework offers, amongst others, SEPA Payments (SCTInst) as a payment instrument. The combination of PSD2 and SCTInst has huge potential to disrupt existing business models, depending on the level of API standardization and penetration of SCTinst in the EU.

    Impacts on the cards business: TPPs such as merchants, giants and PSPs could use the PSD2 APIs to make instant payments directly from customer accounts to the TPP bank account, bypassing card schemes and fees.

    Frictionless instant payments with PSD2: Customer experience is key in payments. Friction and slowness can reduce acceptance of the payment instrument on both the customer and merchant sides, leading to higher cancellation rates in eCommerce checkout processes and longer queues in the store.

    But there are issues with SCA—PSD2 APIs require banks to perform SCA on every transaction. This could lead to friction in the user experience at the point of sale (POS) and in eCommerce. PSD2 provides a convenient way to solve the issue of SCA through inherence and biometrics-based SCA methods. As innovation in this area continues, there will be a huge push towards creating RTS-compliant biometrics authentication methods.

    How banks can innovate

    TPPs such as tech giants and fintechs are not the only ones that could profit from PSD2 and instant payments—banks could also play an important role. Access to accounts and instant payments become commodity services with low or almost no margin for banks. New revenue opportunities will be in the value-added services and the platform ecosystems around these commodity services. “Going beyond PSD2” will include opportunities to monetize additional data and services combined with instant payments.

    Read my complete article at InstaPay for more insights and share your views.

    The post Will PSD2 APIs and instant payments change the game in European payments? appeared first on Accenture Banking Blog.

    Accenture Banking Blog

     
  • user 12:18 pm on June 2, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , payments, , ,   

    U.S. Bank’s Innovation Focus: E-Commerce, Omnichannel, and Realtime Payments 

    for the sake of problem-solving (rather than for its own sake) is the way U.S. Bank’s Dominic Venturo approaches his role of chief innovation officer. The bank has a comprehensive outlook on investing and researching emerging trends through its innovation team, Venturo said. The bank approaches its innovation plan by looking for “interesting [&;]
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 12:18 am on May 25, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Heats, payments,   

    Payments Competition Heats Up as Adyen Confirms IPO 

    The space just keeps getting hotter. Last week, U.S. payments business PayPal bought iZettle, while today Dutch payments platform confirmed its plans to go public. These significant moves confirm that the large players in the space are getting larger. Today, Adyen confirmed plans for an initial public offering (IPO) as early as [&;]
    Bank Innovation

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami