Tagged: fintech Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 7:09 am on May 15, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , fintech   

    Is FinTech Jumping Into Bed With The Wrong Partner? 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAfhAAAAJDUyZTFlMjAzLTVmMmMtNDExYy1hOTZiLWVkZjA4YWYyNzk5ZA

    Recently there has been a spate of articles describing the symbiotic relationship between the established financial services sector and the challengers. For those looking to take on the around the fringes, it’s a different story. For them, it’s keeping one step ahead and offering new services before the lumbering giants’ catch-up – or more likely – eat them up. But for those looking to add and sell services to existing banks, maybe the direct approach isn’t necessarily the best one.

    There’s no doubt that the recent proliferation of FinTech offerings has created some fantastic innovation that will shape and possibly redefine the banking industry. However, there’s also a large majority that will inevitably fail. With $90B of investment into the FinTech bubble last year, how does a bank pick the few winners from the inescapable majority that won’t be around when their VC funding dries up?

    So it’s no surprise that banks aren’t stopping what they’re doing and falling over themselves to partner with these new FinTechs. Banks don’t act impulsively and budgets are worked out a year or more in advance. Of these budgets, a large majority will be spent on regulatory change and keeping the show on the road (KSOR). Discretionary spending will be squeezed and haircuts to approved budgets are inevitable.

    People are waking up to the fact that gaining confidence and selling to the financial services is no easy feat, no matter how good your recently recruited sales team is. The usual financial incentives don’t wash; the banks won’t be rushed into anyone else’s timetable but their own, which is subject to frequent change and reprioritisation.

    Banks are keen on trying things out, proof on concepts, small user pilots – very few of these undertakings are paid for but with the potential carrot so large, the new-to-market FinTech, looking for their breakthrough sale, can’t turn them away. Some will be able to ride out the storm or will have such a great product it will succeed but the majority won’t and not through the fault of their offering.

    Also the banking IT landscape is complex. It is rare that you’ll be interfacing with just the bank’s staff. There’s likely to be a myriad of different vendors, system integrators, and contract staff all with their own agendas not necessarily in step with the bank’s needs. The procurement and change process of each bank requires a small team of specialised staff to navigate effectively, with each bank’s systems and processes being different. How does a small outfit with less than 50 staff in San Jose and a few international sales people navigate all this?

    That’s why I believe that FinTech should be looking for a new partner instead of going straight to the banks themselves. FinTech might live in the Agile world but it needs the assistance of traditional system integrators to help with the mundane and project-based work. Too many start-ups end up over stretching themselves trying to be the project manager, business consultant, technical integrator, documentation producers, change managers, etc., etc., etc.

    And while you might have a great solution running on AWS, what if the bank wants four 9s reliability, is concerned about General Data Protection Regulation 2017, has other concerns such as FINMA, or the need for 24/7 – 365 global support?

    This is where partnering with a SI like Fujitsu with a global presence, a network of data centres, and first class delivery teams can free up FinTechs to carry-on innovating and letting the bank work under an existing master services framework and support package.

    Fujitsu is actively creating an ecosystem of partners not only within FinTech but in all sectors and areas of expertise to help banks and other customers access the latest innovation without the hassle and complications of dealing with hundreds of SMEs that would not traditionally make it past the first hurdle of any large corporation’s procurement process.

    That’s why I believe FinTech should not only try to sell themselves to the Financial Services world but to the SI market. They should be looking for partnering opportunities not only to exploit the SI’s existing customer base but to add confidence and certainty to the question “Which FinTech should I back?”


    This post represent the opinion of the author [linkedinbadge URL=”https://uk.linkedin.com/in/fegan” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Gary Fegan”] .

     

     
  • user 11:08 pm on May 14, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , fintech, , , saying,   

    What startups are saying about raising cash in Latin America 

    buenosaires You don&;t have to look hard to see why the startup community in has long faced a lack of capital and resources to fuel significant growth. Many Latin American entrepreneurs have endured decades of political and economic hardships that left the investment landscape in a less than desirable state &; especially for emerging . Read More


    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 2:59 pm on May 14, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , fintech,   

    Major trends in global financial technology (fintech) 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAh1AAAAJDYzZGYwMTc2LWE2ODctNDhjNS1hNGM4LWU0ZDlmMjlhOTI5ZA

    I am honored to have been invited to speak at a panel during Innovfest unBound in Singapore regarding trends in globally. On top of this Kuchi and our coming product HiHedge has been granted exhibition space at Marina Bay Sands for the duration of the conference! This is pretty awesome, and I like the topic so here will deal in greater detail with the speech topics I’ll bring up at Innovfest! Let’s dig in!

    The state of, and differences between fintech in the US, Europe and Asia?

    Fintech is booming, and Asia is powering up a sprint on the leader, the US. With US$4.5 billion raised in 2015 in Asian investments, out of US$19.1 billion globally, Asia is betting hard on this. Especially when comparing the growth rates – near tripling in Asia – it is aggressive even in a market growing at 60% globally from 2014.

    The United States is leading the game – not just in terms of size of funding. They have an advantage in the maturity of the sector, and also in terms of their diversity and type of business/consumer problems that they are solving. The US has over the last few decades had a much stronger financial sector (Hello Wall St.!) and consulting-, legal-, and operational service sectors of which the financial sector has been one of the top clients. There is simply such a strong breath of talent, people with enough money to be able to bootstrap (go without external funding), and entrepreneurial culture in the US that enables a strong fintech startup ecosystem to grow. On top of this the size of the ecosystem does two things: 1) it allows people to specialize, which makes it more likely that you can start a company and run it successfully in a niche, and 2) it creates a breadth of connections and clients which are all available immediately to the new firm.

    In terms of the specifics of the market, you simply have a stronger B2B story in US fintech. This is mostly because the entrepreneurs there can draw on actual experience of working inside a financial institution or a company servicing them. / distributed ledger innovation is being driven by the same forces. Blythe Masters’s Digital Asset Holdings is one of the best examples of the nexus of payment going all the way to operations in the back office of and stock exchanges! Several other companies are attacking all B2B offerings between and on the side.

    Europe is much, much narrower in terms of fintech. Largely, one can say that fintech in Europe is very, very focused on payments and payments-related issues (authentication, processing, management and aggregation). Germany does however have an added focus on banking (lending, digital banking access) and London is starting to see an asset management sector slowly pop up.

    To a large extent, the payments focus I think is due to having a single market with in some ways different banking and payment systems, and less of a deep and wide pool financial industry talent to feed off of. Although sounding sad, it does bring Europe a focus and solutions that I can foresee will be very important in building broad financial inclusion.

    Broad financial inclusion however, is Asia’s Tour de Force.  Giving access to the unbanked. Finding out how to score credit for thin-file clients. Offering SMEs free B2B tools to run their businesses more effectively. And that’s just in the accelerator I am in! (Shoutout to Cefy and Banhji.) Huge new demographics will be coming into the financial system and will need services that banks are not operationally set to deal with. This is most likely to play out in the B2C space where Asian entrepreneurs have deep experience of the actual end-user problem.

    Couple this with Asia’s affinity for- and success with platform companies and you have an incredible mixture. Investment services on your chat app? Tencent’s WeChat does that at a time when Facebook is asking itself if chat-based commerce makes sense! Immediate payments in-app? Welcome to… well pretty much every Asian chat app. You’re a business and need financing? Were you using Alibaba in the last few years? Chances are that their big investment in Ant Financial gives them an opportunity to offer you a loan based on your Alibaba activity!

    If you’re innovating on a platform, the world can be yours! That applies to fintech and elsewhere, but fintech is simply so hot now.

    So where is the global fintech space going?

    I think the market will play out differently in different parts of the world because it’s being led by vastly different players!

    The US and Europe is led by the specialists, all essentially trying to do the services that financial institutions need (or some of their internal functions) but better. Better in this case means more efficient. Better in this case means lower cost. It’s good enough to make everyone happy.

    In Asia, financial entrepreneurship is largely about doing things differently. Use different solutions altogether and run them on a platform / app instead of jacking in to a chain of financial operations that is inefficient. But Asia is also largely in that stage of growth where large conglomerates can exist, and – by power of brute force, market recognition, management experience and money – are able to simply bring in talent in any field and have a competitive advantage. (This happened in the US with GM, Ford, Motorola, and large parts of Europe’s industrial titans too a few decades ago. Japan’s companies are largely still looking like this.) The execution of specialized tasks and need for deep niche understanding is simply not high enough in these new markets where there are few competitors.

    Asian platforms have all the width and reach you’ll need as an innovator, and they will be your most logical partner. Platforms are also the biggest competitors for incumbents since they can incorporate both scale and speed. If you’re a financial institution you shouldn’t be afraid of opening your e27, TechinAsia, TechCrunch or Wired for fear of seeing the competition. You should be petrified by the Asian companies that Bloomberg and Reuters cover! These are companies like Snapdeal & Flipcart in India; Baidu, Alibaba & Tencent (BAT to China-watchers) in China; and Rakuten, DeNA and LINE Corp. from Japan. These players already have reach, payments, data analytics, and a plug-and-play style platform ecosystem. As a startup, why work to build any of that instead of putting 100% focus in innovative, problem solving products and services?

    Musings on Machine Learning in finance:

    Machine learning will probably make high-paid, routine work obsolete. Unless customization is of the essence, and public data is scarce, large swathes of the time-consuming parts of investment banking, consulting, and accounting will go out the window. Get ready to figure out how you survive in this world, either by building experience or scale. Imagine a machine-learning algorithm going through all of PwC’s consulting database? All their accounting audit documentation? All of Goldman Sachs’s primary market deals database? The end-job still requires strong sales and deep understanding of the client that a human will still need to perform, but all the man-days spent crawling through and filing documentation are numbered.

    Will banks face an Uber Moment?

    No. If that happens that will be named whatever the name of the company is that disrupts them! Let’s compare use cases:

    1. A guy hails a cab on the street. Problem: get from point A to B where B is close to A, in a short time. Possibly also that the person cannot drive or needs to do something else in the meantime. Possible to solve with drivers. The incentives (for the two-sided market place) and regulation are tricky, but providing the service is easy. Duplicate for the use-case being checking in at a hotel. (Person needs space for 1 night, figure out incentives for people with spare rooms, circumvent regulation, and go.)
    2. Someone posts a classified in a paper. Problem: Buyers and sellers, employers and employees, potential friends, romantic partners, etc. can’t find each other. Possible to solve with online bulletin boards that include profiles. A weekend of coding and problem solved. Add people wanting to advertise to those users and you have a business!
    3. A professional walks into a bank. Problem: Well you can’t make a simple problem statement. Which in a million of the problems a bank can solve is this client interested in? Solving any of the problems probably requires the integration and cooperation of several internal bank departments.

    Innovation in banking will happen at the level of the B2B providers to the financial institutions, or potentially in individual bank units. It will be death by a thousand cuts if banks aren’t quick to buy up the innovators before they go to platforms. There will not be one Uber Moment, simply because banking is integrated and complex. Banks have a choice now of whether they want to be Android and provide a platform that works for both producers and end-users, or if they are content being like print newspapers and complaining about innovation being too fast for them.

    Let’s see what some of the Asian financial centers, like Tokyo, Mumbai, Shanghai, Hong Kong and Singapore can cook up in terms of driving fintech innovation!


     [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/tkalvner” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Tim Alvner”], the author of this article is CFO at Kuchi Inc. and Finance Consultant and this was originally published on linkedin

     
  • user 10:56 am on May 14, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , fintech, , OutofHospital   

    Why Out-of-Hospital Blockchains Matter 

    This opinion piece explores possible applications in the healthcare space beyond hospitals and clinics.
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 4:29 am on May 14, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , fintech, ,   

    Why Britain is beating the U.S. at financial innovation 

    poundbeatsdollar Legislation allowing ordinary American investors to invest in the shares of startups and small businesses was first introduced in the U.S. Congress in 2011. Despite bipartisan support and the approval of President Obama, it is only now becoming a reality. Read More


    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 11:43 pm on May 12, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: fintech, , technologydriven, ,   

    The technology-driven transformation of wealth management 

    binarymoney In today&;s digital world, everyday functions such as making dinner reservations or hailing a taxi are done at the touch of a button. Similarly, other, more complex and esoteric functions, such as , are also moving toward automation. This evolution is enabled by the creation of state-of-the-art software, which has helped make wealth management more consumer-friendly&; Read More


    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 10:31 pm on May 12, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ‘Aggressive’, , , , , fintech, Hiring, , ,   

    CapGemini to Develop Blockchain Loyalty Tech Amid ‘Aggressive’ Hiring Push 

    took its latest step on its bid to dramatically increase its investment in this week, announcing a retail payments trial.
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 6:29 pm on May 12, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , fintech, , ,   

    Congressional Committee Hears Testimony on Blockchain in Health Care 

    A representative for a US think tank spoke before a yesterday on ‘s role in .
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 4:56 pm on May 12, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , fintech, , , , , , ,   

    Indian online lending platform Capital Float picks up $25M Series B 

    indian currency rupees shutterstock  , an for small businesses in India, announced today that it has closed a $ 25 million B. Read More


    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 3:38 pm on May 12, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , fintech, , , , TopDown   

    Korea Exchange Talks Top-Down Approach to Blockchain Innovation 

    The opens up about its strategy on tech and why it is investigating how it could be used to open new markets.
    fintech techcrunch

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami