Tagged: banking Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • user 3:35 am on June 15, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: …., , 2035, 2040, banking, Bankless, , , Jahr   

    (Bankless) Banking im Jahr 2030, 2035, 2040 …. 

    Seit die Digitalisierung die Bankenbranche mit voller Wucht erfasst hat, beschäftigen sich diverse Beiträge und Studien mit der Frage, ob es die Banken im , oder noch geben wird. Eine der ersten mir bekannten Veröffentlichungen zu dem Thema ist Sind die Banken die Verlierer des Digitalen Zeitalters? von Hanno Beck und Alois Prinz aus dem Jahr 2000. Im Jahr 2010 erschien Bankless Banking 2030. Eine Transformationsstory von Heinrich Fendt. Erwähnenswert in dem Zusammenhang ist das Expertengespräch der Credit Suisse Keeping the Wheels Turning, das 2013 geführt wurde.

    Neu hinzugekommen sind nun u.a.

    Die UBS-Y Vision richtet ihren Blick in das Jahr 2040. Im Zentrum steht dabei das virtuelle Ich, mit dem sich der Kunde im Netz bewegt. Aber nicht nur das:

    Ebenfalls verfügt der Kunde der Zukunft bereits über einen «evolutionären Filter», der es ihm erlaubt, aus dem auf ihn niederprasselnden Datengewitter relevante Informationen herauszufiltern.

    Die Folge: Was nicht in 2 Sekunden zu erfassen ist, fällt durch. Ebenso alles, was nicht einen unmittelbaren und sofort verfügbaren Mehrwert bietet. Mehr als Dinge und Geldwert zählen dabei Erlebnisse, .. . Der digitalisierte Mensch gibt wieder viel auf physische Sinne und Beziehungen zu Mitmenschen.

    Andreas Buschmeier sieht die Banken durch die fortschreitende Digitalisierung in ihren Kerngeschäftsfeldern Zahlungsverkehr, Kredit und Anlage unter Druck. Die Zukunft könnte digitalen Plattformen gehören, die von -Startups begründet werden.

    Bei Prognosen gilt generell, dass sie schwierig sind, vor allem dann, wenn sie die Zukunft betreffen ?

    Trotzdem lassen sich schon jetzt einige Grundlinien, Muster erkennen, die sich in den nächsten Jahren verstärken werden. Hierzu zählt die Verbreitung großer digitaler Plattformen, wie sie derzeit von Apple, Google, Amazon, Alibaba und Samsung betrieben werden. Die Plattformökfonomie wird auch vor dem nicht Halt machen. Wer als Bank nicht auf einer der führenden Plattformen vertreten ist, wird es schwer haben. Ob es den Banken gelingt, eigene Plattformen, u.a. durch Kooperationen mit Fintech-Startups zu schaffen, wird sich zeigen. Ein weiterer Schub wird durch das sog. Internet of Things kommen. Wenn technische Objekte in der Lage sind, bruchlos miteinander zu kommunizieren, dann lassen sich auch Finanzservices integrieren, ohne dass eine Institution wie eine Bank in Erscheinung treten muss.

    Von großer Bedeutung ist der Einsatz virtueller Assistenten, wie Siri, Alexa und Co. Wenn die Prognose zutreffen sollte, wonach die Menschen sich im Internet mit ihrem virtuellen Ich bewegen, dann muss sich das Banking von Grund auf ändern. Es wird Bedarf an sog. Algorithmic Angels , Vertrauensdiensten, Treuhändern entstehen, die sich als Sachverwalter der Interessen ihrer Kunden, als Partner des &;virtuellen Ich&; verstehen.

    Die Bankeninfrastruktur, wie wir sie heute noch kennen, wird sich ebenfalls von Grund auf ändern. Ob die hier eine gewichtige spielen kann, bleibt abzuwarten. Denkbar ist auch das Modell, von dem Heinrich Fendt spricht, d.h. die Europäische Finanzagentur übernimmt in weiten Teilen die Transaktionsabwicklung, evtl. auf Basis der Blockchain.

    Daneben können wir mit Robert Shiller davon ausgehen, dass bis zum Jahr 2030 noch die eine oder andere Finanzkrise sowie weitere externe Ereignisse eintreten werden, die den Wandel zum Banking beschleunigen können.

    Artikel erschien zuerst auf  http://bankstil.blogspot.com/2016/06/bankless-banking-im-jahr-2030-2035-2040.html

    The post (Bankless) Banking im Jahr 2030, 2035, 2040 &8230;. appeared first on Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH.

    Fintech Schweiz Digital Finance News – FintechNewsCH

     
  • user 12:19 pm on June 10, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , banking, , , , ,   

    Kreditech and the next generation of Consumer Banking 

    is fundamentally about lending and non-bank lending (whether called AltFi, Marketplace Lending or P2P Lending) is already a mature market. Consumer Banking has taken 73% of investment to date (vs only 10% each for Asset Management) and Insurance) and has had the first IPOs and the first big blow ups. Now we&;Read more and the of Consumer&;Banking
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 7:22 pm on June 8, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: banking,   

    Fintech is dead, long live Fintech! 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAhOAAAAJDY1ZWRmOWVhLTMzMzItNDU0OS04ZDIzLTMwZmYzMGJlM2FiZQ

    The first wave has passed its peak. OK, I know I’m not inventing sliced bread here, but if you are one of those people fervently expecting the buzz to translate into the full rebirth of traditional anytime soon, well, you’d better hold your horses. Don’t get me wrong, the disruption of ’ business models is happening (and not only because of Fintech competition but also due to their high-friction distribution model based on branches, plus the negative interest rate environment and the post-crisis regulatory framework). But I guess such an industry disruption (whose outcome has still to be defined) won’t be an overnight process.

    Managing expectations

    In the last 18 months, Fintech has become way too hot, and we’ll probably be surrounded by this hype as long as the “banks”, “digital” and “disruption” combo keeps hitting the headlines. But those won’t be gaining momentum forever, especially once digitalisation becomes the new normal in the industry. Unsurprisingly, people tend to have over-expectations in the short run, especially those who are chomping at the bit to see banks under stress after years of turning their back on their customers and bailouts to the tune of trillions. But unfortunately, this is not the taxi industry and banks cannot be “uberised” as easily as other businesses. The disruption process in banking is not just about opening the business up to competition, but a matter of adapting and transforming the complex and very demanding banking regulatory framework along with banking infrastructures and payment networks. That’s one of the main reasons why the industry cannot be disrupted in a matter of 4-5 years.

    The banking licence

    So I guess the traditional landscape dynamics have not really changed. In the end, banks own banking licences that allow them to issue banks accounts, manage the payment infrastructures, take risk-free retail deposits (covered by the deposit guarantee scheme) and gain access to central banks’ liquidity facilities, without mentioning their too-big-to-fail unfair advantage. With retail depositors their main source of funding, their balance sheets are huge. Besides, as providers of bank accounts, banks de facto own the infrastructure, which means that Fintech firms still need to rely on them one way or another (at least until new regulatory frameworks show up).

    Although the requirements for getting a licence are very high (which becomes an important entry barrier for Fintech. In the UK, it is considered that opening a new bank with a full banking licence requires 20M GBP up front), the obligations derived from it in terms of prudential regulatory compliance (e.g. capital and liquidity requirements) are also remarkable. That said, having a banking licence gives the company a reputational advantage relative to other financial institutions.

    Living up to the standards

    However, it’s amazing how the industry as a whole has been able to overcome all sorts of difficulties, creating a solid narrative appealing to consumers and investors. The Fintech business is not only about offering marketable products and services, but a commitment to values and good practices too. You just need to check out some Fintech webpages and customer feedback to notice that words such as “trust”, “transparency” and “simplicity” are constantly showing up. Apart from the reputational concerns, this reflects firms’ eagerness to differentiate themselves from traditional players in the banking ecosystem and to really put the customer at the centre of their work.

    But this could be a double-edged sword. The fact that the whole industry lies under the same brand constitutes a great advantage for firms (especially start-ups) in need of reaching clients and raising funds. However, it also means that potential malpractices by specific firms are liable to ultimately harm confidence in other Fintech companies. For instance, we have seen how the stress episodes involving platforms such as Lending Club and OnDeck or the bankruptcy of Powa, have been used by some media to extrapolate these firm-specific problems to the whole industry. We’ve also recently experienced how some old-school brokerage firms are trying to position themselves as Fintech while their business model is based on screwing clients through opaque spreads and sales methods based on dumping. 

    Focusing on what really matters

    Nonetheless, living up to these standards may be not enough. Some Fintech companies have been focused on gaining market share based on huge marketing spending without really creating new and/or a defensible competitive advantage. This kind of “low-cost” positioning may work but for a very limited number of players. Generating value through new tech-oriented solutions should be the main target in the medium and long term for any firm seeking to consolidate in the market. We are now experiencing a reality check which will make the Fintech industry healthier, pushing companies to build unique and sticky technology and to collaborate with existing players.

    In a previous post I argued that in the short run we are moving towards a co-petition (co-operative competition) model in which Fintech “stays at the mercy of banks, they [Fintech firms] disrupt banks on one side but they bring them business on the other side. In the end, banks still win.” But such a statement does not have to be valid for the long term – in fact, people tend to underestimate the impact of Fintech on the industry for the coming 10 to 20 years. It seems obvious that the complete digitalisation of financial services is unstoppable since customers are turning digital at an amazing pace (I have recently been told that 90+% of contacts with customers are now through digital channels even at savings banks) but the way this ecosystem will work and interact in the future is still to be defined.

    In conclusion (and coming back to the title of the article), sooner rather than later the Fintech buzz will die, taking with it all the firms that have based their business on empty words. In contrast, those who create real and new technological solutions and products will stay alive, driving the long-term disruption that the industry needs. Besides, relying on this timeframe is not only a more realistic approach for evaluating the real impact of Fintech, but also a medicine against the potential frustration that could otherwise be caused when the short-term hype passes.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/philippegelis” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Philippe Gelis”] is CEO at KANTOX, disrupting the financial industry

     

     
  • user 5:51 pm on June 8, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: BAFT, banking, , , , , , , ,   

    Banking Trade Group BAFT Seeks Bigger Role in Blockchain Policy 

    ‘s newly launched Innovation Council makes serving its members needs a top priority, and that won’t likely change anytime soon.
    fintech techcrunch

     
  • user 12:18 pm on June 3, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , banking, Greek, , Skype,   

    Greek Bank Launches Skype Banking [VIDEO] 

    Now, even is a channel. The Cooperative of Epirus (CBE), based in Ioannina, Greece, has launched customer service using Skype in April for its online banking customers. Currently in testing with a select group of customers, the service will roll out to all customers &;in the near future,&; accordingRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 6:01 am on June 2, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , banking, , , ,   

    Why the “newly banked” will become the biggest problem for digital banks 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAmEAAAAJGQ2NDdkNzdmLTY1MDAtNGMwNC1iNmQxLWI4ODMxZmQ0YzUzMg

    In the past three years, 100 million people have opened accounts for the first time in Africa. In China, there are 500 million people who are ‘newly banked’. In India, 187 million new accounts were opened in just one year on a governmental scheme. In the UK, around 100,000 people came into the stream, either for the first time or after a long break, in the last three years.

    This growing segment of the newly banked, who have emerged from the unbanked population and not-quite-yet-in-the-fully-banked category represents one of the biggest challenges for traditional and challenger in the world (yet, is not talked about as much as it should be!). They have a unique set of problems, and deserve a unique set of solutions – that are not available in the market today.

    The newly banked population does not find a bank account useful

    India’s unbanked population halved in the last four years, according to a report, which means 324 million new accounts were taken in that period. In just the past year, under a Prime Ministerial PMJDY scheme, 187 million new accounts were opened. However, 43% of these accounts lay dormant, with no balance and no deposits or withdrawals.

    In the UK, around half of the people with new, basic bank accounts still chose to manage their money and make transactions in cash. Around 15% of newly opened accounts were closed or abandoned.

    These figures paint such a dire image that it’s a mystery why banks are not taking more steps to bring the newly banked into the well-banked, or at least, the underbanked groups. Offering financial literacy is just one obvious element to fix the problem – the most important change needed is for the bank accounts to offer relevant transaction channels and sensible costs. In Africa, for example, mobile payments on basic phones have taken over the transaction ecosystem, and banks offering viable alternatives is a difficult proposition, yet possible.

    This is because the experience of moving into banking hasn’t been great

    The newly banked population probably used cash for transactions before the bank account, and transferred money using either mobile phone text messages (Africa) or specialised remittance firms (India and UK). In reality, it probably worked fine for them. There was a clear lack of perceived need.

    The expected customer experience (once the bank account is opened) is that it caters to a specific niche challenge the customer visualises would be solved with a bank account. It could be something like reduced bill costs or ease of bill payments, better loan facilities for agriculture, or sometimes availability of online shopping. A good example of catering to a specific demographic is that of six Zambian banks coming together several years ago to provide a secure money transfer mechanism that effectively replaced cash and cheques in the region. In China, a firm offers a SIM overlay that can be used on any phone to access bank accounts remotely.

    Solutions from banks, including those in partnership with technology firms, have to cater to these niche socio-demographic and geographic challenges. If appropriate pricing along with these direct solutions to solve niche problems are not present in a newly opened bank account, it’s unlikely this population will stay with the bank. They will either go back to their old ways with cash, or will look at apps or technology solutions to meet their specific needs.

    The newly banked population may not have access to a branch

    Over 66% of the newly banked population were considered “rural” by a study. If this population doesn’t have access to a branch, it is likely they will not get the personal customer service support or financial product aid they would otherwise be getting. Despite all the branch-bashing that banks face on a regular basis (especially from us fintech fans), branches are in fact one of the best ways to put the newly banked at ease. If full branches are not viable, banks could consider using retailer shops as mini branches, or using field agents to encourage financial access (both models being used exceedingly well in Ghana and Kenya).

    How do we keep them there?

    The only solution to keep them with a bank is unfortunately not quite pleasing: a bank will have to exert greater focus on customer service, financial literacy and access channels specifically targeting the newly banked. This does mean increased costs, increased effort and investment into segment personalisation, but in the long run, without this investment, this population is unlikely to remain with the bank. A simple preventative measure like this will also help them face the fintech competition head-on. A student lending app or an app that helps improve your credit score may appeal more to this young, financially untapped population than having a bank account that provides no clear benefits.

    Banks are increasingly partnering with fintech firms to handle this gap. Technology investments are great, but banks need to know and be in control of what those investments are being made for.

     

    Read the full blogpost at http://banknxt.com/56824/newly-banked/ 

    View my slides from the Dot Finance Africa event on fintech trends in the region:

    http://www.slideshare.net/DevieMohan1/africa-fintech-investment-trends

    Disclaimer: These are my personal views. 


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/deviemohan” connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=””] is  FinTech Market Strategist | Industry Speaker, Blogger and this post was originally published on linkedin.

     
  • user 6:00 am on May 30, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: banking, , , ,   

    Digitised Bank Payments – Their Struggle Saga with Friend FinTech 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAdlAAAAJDEyZTZmN2EyLTY5MjItNDEwNi04OWYzLWY4NDBiMThkYjc5Mw

    Abstract – This article is neither a conclusion nor a claim by any means this is just an assumption and current picture focused on African markets. Idea for this write up is to explorer, read, enjoy, deliberate and put suggestions or new thoughts/ideas on table offcourse comments in agreement/disagreement are welcome. The evolution of financial systems has been a long but interesting journey characterised by sudden changes in underlying . Retail in Africa is far from where it should have been never followed the natural progression. Financial and banking started in a very inefficient and traditional way which was slow but still acceptable to the customers due to the stage in the information age.

    Experts in any form of payments like mobile, Internet, paper or card should not get disappoint after reading this as said its not meant for detailed or deeper understanding. Focus here is on high level discussion and showing what is happening payment industry and contribution/future impact by , MNO, MFS Companies and  well known campuses for all type of payments i.e mobile, internet, paper, plastic cards and even vouchers. There are lucrative but under-utilised banking opportunities in Africa and banks in the region need to step up and grasp these opportunities to succeed. Banking definition as per me  “beautiful and useful phenomena” and for Bank to define it would be “long long ago; a big building use to employe lots of people and consume too much space, money, power, and IT machines but use to works very slow and for very limited time of day and weeks”.

    Introduction – Initially, almost all the fun & joy in the financial banking services (except non-banking services) space was attributable to banks with all the revenue being collected by the same entities. With advancement in technology, organisations outside the banking industry diversified into financial services targeting margins in the space. These were organisations servicing millions of customers through broad distribution channels, be they mobile operators, retailers or on-line merchants. If we had any global ministry of innovation for regulation and control then for sure on date cash will be only the single king. A small study on Informal Financial System of Indonesia depicts very clearly; there are three products/services which are key in Indonesian market “Savings, Loans and Remittances (Domestic[Money traveling from cities to villages & International)” which are also a key products for banks but due to bank mind set of playing with BIG/LARGE figures this will never rise up well.

    If Reserve Banks, Regulator, Fintech companies and MNO plays well then this market size can grow up to approximately for about billion USD a month and can grow to even much higher. Following few crisis, most countries have increased monitoring and regulation on banks.elf regulation upto an extend by FinTech service providers really pushing hard to change the world; entrepreneurs are leading a pack of disrupters, most of them raised in the shadow of companies like PayPal, who wants to change business relationship to money forever. BaaS came as friend for all such companies to break Banks attitude as they were long seen as a highly technical, highly complex with rocket science technology using industry, employing Finantists (Financial Scientists), highly regulated industry dominated by giant banks that were only doing one thing that was to resist disruption. Banking as a Service (BaaS) on Banking as a Platform(BaaP) can be provided by any one.

    Main Story – Africa is dealing with the challenges of putting in place efficient, secure, low cost operating models, centralised operations, multichannel and multi-product capabilities coupled with low price, lighter and lean operating models. According to a study by Google available on various links, 80% of Africa’s total adult population do not have access to any form of formal financial services. FinTech’s (Under cover by MNO’s) in Africa are winning the race due to their focus and attitude of “be my customer” as opposed to the banks “who is eligible to be my customer” approach. MNO’s speed to achieve their goal to standardise, automate, digitise, remove boundaries by brining cross order financial/remittances service in form of payments, cash, airtime, paperless and online. At the same time banks are still in their canteens with their coffee mugs without any sign of worry but in reality all African banks face tough challenges from MNO’s & Fintech players.

    The role of informal institutions in providing financial services to the members of the community, and concludes by highlighting the opportunities these are present for formal financial service providers but in order to ensure accessibility of banking services, a bank has to have a wide branch network of fully branded brick and mortar marble banking halls with all the necessary security systems. The set up costs of these are so high and to recoup the same, the bank has to pass on the cost to the ultimate consumer. Times have changed and with change comes opportunity. Over the past few years, the face of financial payments in most developing countries has taken a radical change from a bank model to an FinTech (backed by MNO) company dominated model. This change has brought about financial inclusion to most marginalised citizens and has greatly brought efficiency in the payment industry. This article will focus on why banks mobile banking can never out beat MNOs mobile money and happy to get feedback in agreement or against with reasons as these are pure my own views. Accessibility is a critical success factor for any service.

    Banks on the other hand have limited operating hours and for those who have utilised technology by diffusing access to service from banking halls have a great limitation of country borders. MNO makes money on transactions but banks earns on money remain in account (Though this model has changed completely for most of African countries). MNOs on the other hand have embraced the concept of an extensive agent network at minimal cost. MNOs agent network is usually dense with at least 1 agent for every 1km radius. Customer does not need to travel long distances or fork out any money access an agent and perform agent centred transactions. Due to the nature of business, FinTech’s have excelled in “24×7, around the globe, use me” phenomena. This assures timeless and borderless access to services which provides for ease of use, more transactions and higher revenue for the MNOs.

    In order for any business to thrive, it has to observe a wide cost to revenue ratio, however banks are subject to a high customer acquisition cost at $10 to $100 per customer whereas MNOs stand at between $2 and $10. This acquisition cost has a ripple effect on the charging structure throughout the life cycle of the relationship between the bank and the customer. Naturally, when the cost of customer acquisition is high, the resultant transactional cost will follow the same trend. The cost of transacting on a banking platform is very high compared to transacting on a Mobile Money platform. – MNO’s interest in retaining subscriber is more then banks by giving service which may or may not generate revenue and always try to run promotions around same to win back. Usually the cost of setup and signage is borne by the agent itself in a bid to be more visible and to attract more customers as revenue is highly dependent on the volume of transactions pushed by the agent.

    This is the time when customer centricity, financial inclusion and customer serving infrastructure (Agents, Merchants, Billers, Remittance partner’s network) should be the top agenda for banks in Africa but sadly it is not. Banks wants to run only behind high value with high dollar value transactions not dollar or two dollar value transactions. Banks in the region only continue to develop strategies to achieve sustainable growth which may not materialise as of now since it looks like the only strategy nothing beyond that. At the same time without a doubt I need to be honest as well with specific examples wherein a Bank is trying to jump the MNO’s role with the idea of strengthening and furthering financial inclusion. Kenya’s Equity Bank, Kenya & South Africa’s FNB bank opted to be a Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO). 

    A few golden rules/bullet points to get quick wins;

    • Needs to focus outside “digital and social media channel” i.e focus on radio, road show with village communities, focus on groups with in local language and style
    • Trust local people to act as brand ambassadors for increasing customer loyalty and trust
    • Focus on creating a cost-effective and efficient operating model is the golden key
    • Carefully thought through branch expansion verses setting up an agent network
    • Managing risk, security, compliance and bringing it up to global standard
    • Leveraging mobile as primary medium for transactions and queries and online banking
    • Technology enabled customer engagement and continuous innovation
    • A complete set of counter-measures against Money Laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation, covering the required legal, regulatory and operational measures through and through knowledge set
    • In-depth knowledge & willingness to attain knowledge on principles for mobile financial services Infrastructures.
    • Understanding and willingness to attain in depth knowledge and hands-on core banking platform integration with MFS systems, architecture, banking grade switching and rules around same

    The world is currently facing an economic crisis and most people are living on a hand to mouth basis. Banks go against the economic tide by encouraging savings (Which is correct and required for country economy and betterment of each person life) while MNOs encourage spending. There is little savings and investment in most countries hence most citizens spend whatever they earn on basic survival requirements. MNOs were quick to realise this and enabled ease of payment for most commodities through merchant payment facilities and payment for most utilities and bills through bill payment services. In case of New Start up – MNO helped boost GDP by helping people with the will to startup their own business and grow, free consultation and support – “You Grow – I Grow” philosophy. For Distribution Channels Money distribution should be treated as distribution of cigarettes, coke & water bottles; which MNO can do easily with flexibility and Banks never thought of creating Agent networks where MNO’s Key success factor is Agent Banking only, on Limits side MNO Finical services limits set on upper limit and for Banks its on lower values. So MNO whole game is on Volume and Bank only wants value

    MNOs run exhibit a high affinity to retain subscribers than banks. This is observed by the multiple promotions which may or may not be revenue generating and encourages customer win back. An MNO can run as much as 3 promotions per quarter while banks could go for a year without any activity simulating promotion. Banks have generally been found lacking in the areas of innovation, technology utilisation and adoption. A typical bank will review the architecture of their banking system once every 5 years while MNOs employ solution architecture who work hand in hand with their product development and innovation arms to deliver efficient and relevant solutions which meet the needs of the market. Suppliers of core banking systems have kept the system eco system as complex as rocket science which makes integration to other systems a nightmare. This is in opposition to the open API approach adopted by MNOs. Most countries have slackened regulation on MNOs while banks are subject to stringent regulation by respective central banks and deposit protection bodies. Banks were known to be the centre of most economies financial transactions and in order to ensure stability to economies, most governments maintain a close watch on transactions in the formal payment system.

    This education encompasses the knowledge, attitudes, skills and behaviours of consumers with regard to managing their resources and understanding, selecting, and making use of financial services that fit their needs. Mobile financial service providers i.e MNOs or Banks or even Independent MFS companies can succeed by focusing on some key areas to hold a much better position from today to tomorrow. Because financial capability is a relatively new area, alternative definitions and approaches to its measurement exist in parallel. The term “financial literacy” refers to one aspect of financial capability—the knowledge and awareness of financial concepts and products. The framework developed for the financial inclusion and financial services for unbanked communities differ country to country and different service providers (Banks, MNO and FS/FinTech companies). Relaxed regulation allows MNOs to diversify and tap into financial services while banks find it difficult to venture into any other industry outside the usual core financial payments.

    Most regulators impose stringent KYC requirements for account opening on banks. These requirements form a wide spectrum spanning from proof of residence, copy of ID, confirmation of employment to assure source of funds and a passport sized photo. Most citizens fall short on some of these requirement and failure to meet any one of the above immediately makes one ineligible to open an account. This places banks at a disadvantage because most people operate outside the formal employment system hence lack part of the account opening prerequisites. The relationship between customer and bank is a relationship of trust, any customer deposit held by the bank is a liability which has to be honoured whenever it falls due. Some banks have failed to manage liquidity risk resulting in them being placed under curatorship by the respective regulators. Such a move has catastrophic effects of disrupting the banks ecosystem as bank hold cross investments with each other.

    The informal trade market size is estimated to be worth around $7.4 billion for most African countries(Based on assumptions and reading on internet articles). Banks have a restrictive approach when it comes to on boarding customers. When one approaches a bank with a request, be it a new account opening or a loan request, they are subjected to rigorous checks and processes which frustrate would be customers. This “who is eligible to be my customer” approach results in a low on boarding rate for banks. MNOs on the other hand use a “please be my customer” approach which proves to be a hit as they on board multiple subscribers daily. For this reason, MNOs are more inclined to tap into both the formal and the informal sectors of the economy while banks concentrate on the formal sector. Informal sectors prove to be more profitable than formal sectors because they push high volume, low value transactions.

    The restrictive KYC requirements can also be applied in a tiered approach depending on the value at risk and the transactional volume of the account. A number of banks in Africa have embarked on agency banking to increase their footprint in the operating countries. MNOs through underlying banks, have started giving instant loans using online credit rating systems basing on credit data, transactional data, tenure with the MNO, daily spend and other conditions. Banks take days to approve loans as they have a low risk appetite. The telecoms business is also characterised by a high rate of churn as subscribers switch operators looking for favourable deals. Some countries have adopted number portability where subscribers maintain their number when they switch operators.

    Banked customers on the other hand have a lot of thinking and clearance to do before changing banks because a number of financial services like loans, investments and mortgages are coupled to their bank account number. In order to improve profitability and gain relevance in the mobile payment space, banks should invest more in market research and gather the requirements of the markets they operate in. this is easily achieved by setting up a dedicated R and D division and allocating an adequate budget for this cause. Basing on the closed nature of core banking systems, banks can separate a mobile money system from the core banking system to achieve the flexibility required from a mobile payment system.

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAPnAAAAJDA1MWZlYjRlLWYxNGItNDY1Mi1hOTc4LWJiZmRmMWI2Yjg5MwConclusions: Running on unknown path without roadmap or direction with due respect running like a headless chicken often result in disasters. I personally have seen and taken part in programs to build my experience or hands on mastery in such situations where Mobile Payments or Mobile Wallet based Cross Border remittances support country economy and proven in 100% confidence level that when it came to the crunch, many countries including Greece, Cyprus & Italy had no choice but to accept rescue terms that affected not only bank bondholders and shareholders – but many thousands of private deposit holders. Their cash or savings were simply scalped and went to help fund the closure of one bank and the propping up of others. Opportunities are countless; one who seizes them first gets the upper hand. Thanks to regulation and central bank support through the Ministry of Innovation. Get up, spread your wings and grab as much sky (I guess there is no more land left) as you can. 

    These policies from Ministries of Innovation MNOs are the best admirer and advantage takers. Sadly for majority of the banks this is still unknown path and some not a preferred route. The so-called “haircut” imposes comes along the way that helps in worsening the problem in negative smiley way. Solution that is hastily designed to fall with large sums in offshore accounts can be avoided very well with MFS. Mobile Payments expected to explode beyond 3 trillion euros by 2020 , Mobile Money save 2 billion USD for few African countries , Mobile Money is not just cash in , cash out via agents any more or P2P money transfer Africa have given new and very different dimension and speed of like blink of eyes , getting Money from UK, US or any where in the world within seconds around 24X7 directly to your wallets , all bill payments, merchant payments, loans, insurance …. and never stopping or ending story. 

    Banks need to take a radical change from their current modus operandi in order to beat MNOs in the field of mobile payments or else take back seat as clerk for reconciliations and accounting units and regulator should allow MFS companies to innovate and bring new solutions and products in no time and make customers life easy, less costly and much faster. I guess banks still looks like banks but shift in paradigm and model so if need to transact more or above $10,000. In nutshell retail is almost underwater and corporate still have chance and time.

    ================ About the Author ================

    Read about Author  at : About Me   

    Thank you all, for spending your time reading this post. Please share your feedback / comments / critics / agreements or disagreement / remark for more details about posts, subjects and relevance please read the disclaimer.

    Facebook Page                Twitter              Blog                   Linkedin Pulse  

     
  • user 11:35 am on May 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: banking, , , , unbanked   

    The Unbanked Population: Missing Links in the Fintech Ecosystem | FinTech 

    As the specter of a financial slowdown in China looms, economic effects are beginning to cascade through­­ the entire Southeast Asian archipelago, heightening the unease of investors and businesses. are braced for dwindling dividends and financial conventions are under threat from the growth of . According to ’s 2015 Global Annual Review, in 2014 VC investments in Fintechs leapt to $12.2 Billion compared to 2013 and in 2015, with more than 12,000 Fintech companies moving into every banking activity and market.

    For the penurious villager in Cambodia, however, the peaks and troughs of economic cycles bear miniscule impact. Driven to the periphery by the financial ecosystem, this burgeoning class represents the least financially-educated of the social hierarchy. Due to a lack of financial structure, this band of individuals – comprised of micro businesses and the financially challenged – encapsulate Asia’s economic paradox.

    Despite the growing realization that long-term economic growth needs to be built on the foundation of financial inclusion, the World Bank’s recent report revealed that only 27% of citizens in Southeast Asia have access to a bank account. Cut off from conventional resource channels, a significant number of the region’s population have no avenue to raise capital or apply for credit. The promise of social mobility remains elusive for the “”, perpetuating the vicious cycle of poverty for generations.

    The emergence of Fintech has disrupted a host of industries, fronting new opportunities and striving to fix old problems. FinTech has shown a potential in driving economy and gradually upgrade the welfare of more than 600 million people in the region. Harnessing the potential of data analytics, Fintech has chartered new paths; amalgamating business know-how and social networks to fill barren gaps left by commercial banks.

    However, most platforms, which includes P2P lending and crowdfunding, target small and mid-sized businesses with high-growth potential. While these additions supplement commercial banks and enhance the capital financing ecosystem, the clientele hasn’t shifted dramatically.

     

     

     
  • user 12:18 am on May 29, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , banking, , , interviews, , , ,   

    What we learned about the transformation of Consumer Banking from 5 Pirates with Ties interviews 

    One of the things that makes this job so much fun is the ability to talk to the really smart people in a dynamic market. Doing a startup is hard;  we are entrepreneurs ourselves so we get that. However we want to counter the myth that all innovation comes VC fundedRead More
    Bank Innovation

     
  • user 11:37 am on May 28, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: banking, ,   

    From Blockchain PoCs to commercial launch 

    AAEAAQAAAAAAAAkYAAAAJGIzZjJlZGMyLWFlZmItNGIzMS05ZTcwLTAzODkyMGQyMTFiZg

    People working in big companies experimenting with we receive PoC proposals every week, and in most cases the selling argument is always how cheap the is, with phrases like “you don´t need any special integration, we can set up a private network or a public node in this or that cloud” (always very well known clouds with Blockchain as a Service offering). I always wonder the value of those PoCs not integrated with core systems or at least  with a sandbox environment.

    Most PoCs I have seen so far not take into account the security and regulatory requirements when launching a financial service into production

    I mean, when we decided to build our own blockchain banking infrastructure the goal was to build a blockchain platform that meets banking security architectural standards and is easy to integrate with existing core banking so that going into production could be done straight away. The first thing we did was to hold meetings with our architects to understand our current architecture (fo both the core banking and digital extensions) with the special focus on the security, APIs and microservices pieces. After those meetings, we realised that we had to change some of our initial assumptions for the blockchain technical design, based on the PoCs we had run outside the banking infrastructure.

    The problem is that this technology was born to replace the banking industry and most start-ups and IT vendors have no real experience in the banking industry and the requirements around security in payments or customers personal data and credentials, or they just suggest you to abandon the current core banking and use blockchain as a standalone piece.  So, most PoCs I have seen so far not take into account the security and regulatory requirements when launching a financial service into production, or even worse a profitable business model (but profitability is another story I may write about in future). At the end, all the work done during the PoC is not valid and has to be thrown away and remanufactured from scratch.

    When designing a PoC we must take into account the requirements for integration with the IT systems

    So, my humble recommendation when designing a PoC we must take into account the requirements for integration with the IT systems since it can impact the customer experience, platform productivity, and even the investment costs/ business case when going live. Otherwise, the movement from PoC to commercial pilot/ launch could be a nightmare.


    [linkedinbadge URL=”https://es.linkedin.com/in/roberto-garc%C3%ADa-938a333″ connections=”off” mode=”icon” liname=”Roberto García”]  is Innovation Manager at Santander Group (IT&Operations Global Division)

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami